Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Single\s+tower\s+and\s+3\s+monoband\s+yagis\s+\-\s+\"Christmas\s+three\"\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Single tower and 3 monoband yagis - "Christmas three" (score: 1)
Author: Fuad Arnautovic <infobih@infobih.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:16:04 +0000
Hi all I need advice from some more experienced with stacking about possible setup. Have self-standing tower abt 18 mtr, mast 50 mm (2") 5-6 metres long Antennas are three monoband yagis as follows 2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00115.html (8,070 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Single tower and 3 monoband yagis - "Christmas three" (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:12:23 -0500
Unless the monobanders have been designed to operate in a stack ("Christmas tree"), stacking them as closely as will be needed to stay within your 5m mast will certainly reduce their performance. If
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00118.html (8,622 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Single tower and 3 monoband yagis - "Christmas three" (score: 1)
Author: n8de@thepoint.net
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:35:52 -0500
I agree with Joe, W4TV, but, would add the comment: PUT THE 20M monobander on TOP of the stack .. that is .. invert it, with the 10m on the BOTTOM. 73 Don N8DE Unless the monobanders have been design
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00122.html (9,518 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Single tower and 3 monoband yagis - "Christmas three" (score: 1)
Author: Fuad Arnautovic <infobih@infobih.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:01:05 +0000
Thank you I will probably try 10/15/20 from lowest to highest with spacing of app. 8 feets. 73 Fudo ________________________________________ From: TowerTalk [towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] on beha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00123.html (11,611 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Single tower and 3 monoband yagis - "Christmas three" (score: 1)
Author: Billy Cox <aa4nu@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:18:09 +0000 (UTC)
Good Afternoon Fudo, May I suggest before you invest into doing this, you review W6QHS/W6NL and N6BT's published materials on the "christmas tree". Both found the performance, regardless of which yag
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00124.html (10,705 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Single tower and 3 monoband yagis - "Christmas three" (score: 1)
Author: Fuad Arnautovic <infobih@infobih.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:02:18 +0000
Hi Billy Thank you for sharing your experience. I supposed that required configuration will not work as expected. It seems that available tower /height,spacing/ not allow optimal spacing between ante
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00125.html (12,873 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Single tower and 3 monoband yagis - "Christmas three" (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:10:58 -0500
Given the short distance between top and bottom antennas, is there a benefit to this kind of array vs. interlaced monobanders on a common boom? That's exactly the reason I asked if the monobanders ha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00126.html (12,227 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Single tower and 3 monoband yagis - "Christmas three" (score: 1)
Author: Fuad Arnautovic <infobih@infobih.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:21:03 +0000
Exactly, best way to decide to stay with 2 antennas per small tower and then tweak them to have best fine tuning for my specific micro location You given to me more direction where to go what saves
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00127.html (14,268 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Single tower and 3 monoband yagis - "Christmas three" (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:18:23 -0600
For a couple of years I had three homebrew monobanders on a single tower at P40A and it worked nicely. I had the 20m and 15m beams on the mast and the 10m beam was on a ring rotator well below the ot
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00131.html (10,152 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Single tower and 3 monoband yagis - "Christmas three" (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:07:35 -0800
Antennas are three monoband yagis as follows 20m 4el 9,5m boom 15m 5el 9,6m boom 10m 5el 7,6m boom For SO1R, even if this works without interaction (unlikely), it is at best marginally better than a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00136.html (9,892 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Single tower and 3 monoband yagis - "Christmas three" (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 13:49:58 -0600
Can I step back and ask a bigger-picture question? Given the short distance between top and bottom antennas, is there a benefit to this kind of array vs. interlaced monobanders on a common boom? In F
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00142.html (13,309 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu