Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Which\s+rotor\s+for\s+a\s+tree\s+setup\s+\-\s+Ham\s+3\,\s+Ham\s+4\s+\,other\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Which\s+rotor\s+for\s+a\s+tree\s+setup\s+\-\s+Ham\s+3\,\s+Ham\s+4\s+\,other\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Which rotor for a tree setup - Ham 3, Ham 4 ,other (score: 1): Author: Krishna Kanakasapapathi <kkanakas@cisco.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:26:37 -0500; Folks, I am just waiting on a decision from my Hoa Architecture board on a choice between a Aluma 50ft crankup with a 3Ele steppIr + Tv antenna (versus) the 3Ele stepper on top of a 70ft pine. I am t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00216.html (7,685 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Which rotor for a tree setup - Ham 3, Ham 4 ,other (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:41:33 EST; choice between a Aluma 50ft crankup with a 3Ele steppIr + Tv antenna (versus) the 3Ele stepper on top of a 70ft pine. I am trying to decide on a Rotor should the tree proposal win. I have a Ham 3 and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00233.html (8,330 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Which rotor for a tree setup - Ham 3, Ham 4 ,other (score: 1): Author: Krishna Kanakasapapathi <kkanakas@cisco.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:18:25 -0500; Thanks Steve,Joe & Mitch, I appreciate the feedback. Steve,I plan to fabricate the mount per your description based on an earlier thread. The recommendation from the tree removal firm was to use lag; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00242.html (9,418 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]