Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2ev@arrl.net: 243 ]

Total 243 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [VHFcontesting] For Sale: Complete 4-band station ready to use (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 20:58:07 -0500
Would you mind waiting until AFTER the Rochester VHF Group net at 9:00 tonight? It would be nice to have you check in one last time. Ev, W2EV btw...how much for the SO-239 barrel connectors on your a
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00073.html (8,326 bytes)

122. Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: Six Meter Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 06:26:49 -0500
This is a v-e-r-y cool idea. I've always thought that we should have another band between these, anyway. The June VHF QSO party gathers HFers because of the HF-like 6m conditions a vice versa for the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00078.html (7,830 bytes)

123. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for Limiting MultiOps [was:Asuggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes] (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 07:14:07 -0500
NOT use spectrum It's not about getting everyone to buy microwave gear. It's about sending conflicting messages. The way the rules are written about MultiOp participation, those that CHOOSE to use ou
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00079.html (11,303 bytes)

124. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for Limiting MultiOps[was:Asuggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes] (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:15:22 -0500
And THAT's the problem. The organization is promoting activities that work against each other. They have patently different goals. The Spectrum Defense Fund encourages the defense of our spectrum ass
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00102.html (10,443 bytes)

125. Re: [VHFcontesting] Many bands not always a big advantage (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:19:29 -0500
Hi Bill, It's a natural evolution. It will simply take you time to figure out how to band-hop and then return to 2 meters and get noticed again. If it was easy, then everyone would "do it". Give your
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00106.html (8,141 bytes)

126. [VHFcontesting] What's the loophole? [was: A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes] (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:43:41 -0500
What loophole? The "formula" is no more complex than the one that you had to memorize to get your license in the first place, be it 468/f or P=(I^2)R. Compare what you have today to the ERP Proposal:
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00107.html (12,639 bytes)

127. [VHFcontesting] Example of a real-world calculation [was: Asuggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes] (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 21:50:38 -0500
Bill, No one said that your antenna system would put you in the HP or "S/O Unlimited" category. Your ERP factor would be calculated as... (56 elements) * 60 watts = 3,360 Assuming that the same pivot
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00108.html (11,914 bytes)

128. [VHFcontesting] Another Example [was: A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes] (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:09:20 -0500
Surprisingly, ERP-based calculation stays simple. All one must do is determine the "ERP Factor" pivot point that makes the most sense for a given band. Let's use some real examples (just like the one
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00111.html (11,992 bytes)

129. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for LimitingMultiOps[was:Asuggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes] (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:36:17 -0500
Hi Lee, I must not have used the right words somewhere. I whole heartedly agree that contests (by definition) promote the use of spectrum (imagine trying to contest without using any <g>). The advant
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00114.html (10,710 bytes)

130. Re: [VHFcontesting] Another Example [was: A suggestion for ERP-basedEntry Classes] (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 22:40:54 -0500
Not at all, Don. As I said earlier...factoring-in dishes is simply something that I've not included in the base proposal, but could be easily done with a little thought. The concept is sound, and I'l
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00115.html (10,215 bytes)

131. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for Limiting MultiOps[was:Asuggestionfor ERP-based Entry Classes] (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 06:54:41 -0500
If your theory is true, then is should be supported by contest logs. Engaging a normalized study one should find that an ABCD9E multioperator log and ABCD9E singleoperator log should have equivalent
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00123.html (11,278 bytes)

132. Re: [VHFcontesting] Another Example [was: A suggestion for ERP-basedEntry Classes] (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 07:04:34 -0500
Maybe...but that strategy is something that they will find is counterproductive and eventually find a strategy that works better for them. The ERP-based proposal still allows us to be stupid if we w
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00124.html (12,262 bytes)

133. Re: [VHFcontesting] Another Example [was: A suggestion for ERP-basedEntry Classes] (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 07:15:39 -0500
Of course! :) The physics of RF comes into play (including the physics of band conditions, QSB, etc.) as a variable anyway -- as does operator skill. That is why I've also said that the challenge is
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00125.html (11,854 bytes)

134. [VHFcontesting] A Proposal for Limited Multiop Categorization Study (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 07:27:32 -0500
== WHEREAS... Our mantra is "use it or lose it" The ARRL expends significant resources to the defense of our spectrum - See these hyperlinks at http://www.arrl.org: Donate to ARRL > ARRL Funds > Defe
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00126.html (8,347 bytes)

135. [VHFcontesting] One last one clarification [was: A suggestion for LimitingMultiOps] (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 19:12:52 -0500
No, this is NOT my position, Kenneth. My position is ... ready for this (?)... We should occupy spectrum through radiosport for the sake of sport AND the rules for the sport should NEVER discourage m
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00144.html (10,632 bytes)

136. Re: [VHFcontesting] rover music video (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:07:05 -0500
http://VHFGroup.RochesterNY.org | Downloads Pick "Medium" for broadband and "Low" for dial up Enjoy the videos there. :) Ev, W2EV -- PropNET: If the band is open and no one is TXing, does anyone hear
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00149.html (7,813 bytes)

137. Re: [VHFcontesting] rover music video (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 08:13:58 -0500
The web server is down. More info shortly. Sorry for the delay. Ev -- PropNET: If the band is open and no one is TXing, does anyone hear it? HamIM : Messaging the all-ham way, find Rovers as they go
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00154.html (7,634 bytes)

138. [VHFcontesting] HamIM link (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 17:46:08 -0500
Having reached the end of my wits with a previous host for the HamIM information, I have rebuilt it on another server. I *think* I've now sent it to anyone who has asked for it, but on the off chance
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00160.html (6,868 bytes)

139. Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: AHCML, could no longer (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 20:12:10 -0500
Not for nuthin', but the headers to these messages look like this: -- Received: from dayton.akorn.net (dayton.akorn.net [216.1.128.73]) by xlate1.mailsvcs.arrl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id hBM12
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00164.html (8,477 bytes)

140. Re: [VHFcontesting] Test for Subscriber Filter (score: 1)
Author: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 20:42:31 -0500
fwiw. I guess we now know how spam has found the list. :( Ev, W2EV -- PropNET: If the band is open and no one is TXing, does anyone hear it? HamIM : Messaging the all-ham way, find Rovers as they go
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00172.html (7,626 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu