VHFcontesting
[Top] [All Lists]

[VHFcontesting] One last one clarification [was: A suggestion for Limiti

To: vhfcontesting@contesting.com
Subject: [VHFcontesting] One last one clarification [was: A suggestion for LimitingMultiOps]
From: "Ev Tupis (W2EV)" <w2ev@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 19:12:52 -0500
List-post: <mailto:vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
"Kenneth E. Harker" wrote:
> Ev's position: We should occupy spectrum through radiosport for the sake of
>                occupying spectrum.
> 
> My position:   We should occupy spectrum through radiosport for the sake of
>                sport.

No, this is NOT my position, Kenneth.  My position is ... ready for this (?)...

We should occupy spectrum through radiosport for the sake of sport AND the rules
for the sport should NEVER discourage me from running as many bands as one can
muster.

The Limited MultiOp category (as it is defined today) does us a dis-service.

Ev, W2EV

-- 
PropNET: If the band is open and no one is TXing, does anyone hear it?
HamIM  : Messaging the all-ham way, find Rovers as they go to play.
         That HamIM, that HamIM -- I'm sure you'll like that HamIM.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ask me about either.  I'll send a URL and you can join the fun, too!

_______________________________________________
VHFcontesting mailing list
VHFcontesting@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>