Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w7xu@w7xu.com: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ VHF & "Self Spotting" (score: 1)
Author: Arliss <w7xu@w7xu.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 16:23:57 -0500
RA: I do. Picking operating times, station building, digging, searching, straining for contacts is quite satisfying when successful. Who would enjoy a treasure hunt if someone posted a map showing w
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-07/msg00037.html (8,231 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 and the ARRL June VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: Arliss <w7xu@w7xu.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 01:22:03 -0500
My experience with FT8 during the contest mirrored Marshall's. I also support his recommendations. In particular, I would prefer the NA contest mode to be the full-time default condition for the WSJT
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-06/msg00058.html (13,284 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] 222 skeds (score: 1)
Author: Arliss <w7xu@w7xu.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 21:56:11 -0500
Hello 222 fans -- I'm looking for 222 meteor skeds (MSK144) with the following states: VT, MA, CT, RI, DE, WV, SC, FL and LA. I've worked ME and CA previously, so any of these states should be within
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-08/msg00028.html (6,990 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Fwd: VHF Contests Rules Discussion and Proposal (score: 1)
Author: "w7xu@w7xu.com" <w7xu@w7xu.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 21:59:55 -0500
Just a few thoughts from the middle of the country -- The more populated areas of the country already have a huge advantage when it comes to making QSOs compared to those of us who have fewer than a
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-03/msg00024.html (9,553 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] States needed on 222 for WAS.... (score: 1)
Author: Arliss <w7xu@w7xu.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 13:55:02 -0500
I am trying to work as many states on 222 as possible without using EME. I still need to work: VT, MA, DE, RI, WV, SC, FL, LA, MT or WY. I've worked OR and NY in the past, but still need QSLs confirm
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-06/msg00059.html (9,124 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT4 (score: 1)
Author: Arliss <w7xu@w7xu.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 23:48:35 -0500
I operated part-time during the CQ contest and found conditions to be reasonably good on 6m at the start of the contest. The mode distribution for my 6m QSOs was: SSB -- 135 QSOs CW -- 6 MSK144 - 13
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2020-07/msg00068.html (8,289 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu