Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+ARRL\s+Petition\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+ARRL\s+Petition\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] ARRL Petition.... (score: 1): Author: Marshall-K5QE <k5qe@k5qe.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 22:12:53 -0500; Here is a Change.org petition that you should look into. If you agree, then sign the petition and forward the link below to as many Amateurs as possible. 73 Marshall K5QE https://www.change.org/p/arr; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-07/msg00041.html (6,895 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL Petition.... (score: 1): Author: Paul Kiesel via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 05:20:57 +0000 (UTC); This guy has a beef. Let him settle the beef himself. The ARRL is not perfect, but it represents me pretty well. I think it is just fine to have closed meetings. Subject: [VHFcontesting] ARRL Petitio; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-07/msg00042.html (8,171 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL Petition.... (score: 1): Author: "Henry Ingwersen" <kt1j@madriver.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 06:28:06 -0400; I agree with Paul. Overall, I'm appreciative of what ARRL, its staff and all its volunteers are doing for me. It can't be easy serving such a diverse, often highly opinionated membership. KT1J This g; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-07/msg00043.html (8,899 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL Petition.... (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 08:56:09 -0500; *Overall* I agree else I'd never have become a Lifer. There are many exceptions to that "overall", though, but one of them recently retired. :-) I'm willing to see what the new guy has to offer. -- P; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-07/msg00044.html (7,666 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL Petition.... (score: 1): Author: Roger Rehr W3SZ <w3sz73@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:14:11 -0400; I agree with Peter, Paul, and Henry. It is much more difficult to lead an organization than it is to cast stones from the sidelines. The folks at the ARRL have my great appreciation and highest respe; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-07/msg00045.html (8,779 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL Petition.... (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:06:25 -0500; Who are appearing at the Ramada out on Route 17 this weekend, BTW. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing lis; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-07/msg00046.html (7,763 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL Petition.... (score: 1): Author: "STEVE NOTEBOOK" <stephen.tripp@snet.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:52:42 -0400; I appreciate all that the ARRL is doing to keep amateur radio alive and well. I am in agreement with W1SZ and others that the Petition post is inappropriate on this reflector. If the amateur is not h; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-07/msg00047.html (9,610 bytes)
8. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL Petition.... (score: 1): Author: "Bob Burns W9BU" <w9bu_lists@rlburns.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 14:16:50 -0400; Many of the "highly-opinionated" ARRL detractors aren't even members (and I'm not implying that the petitioner isn't a member). There are over 700,000 licensed amateur radio operators in the U.S., bu; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-07/msg00063.html (9,206 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]