Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Category\s+alignment\s+\[was\:\s+one\s+stop\s+\(pass\)\s+grids\]\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Category alignment [was: one stop (pass) grids] (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:51:06 -0800 (PST)
To the questions you raised... In what way is it unfair to stationary contestants? The point is *not* to work as many people as possible. It *is* to align Rover rules with that of all other classes o
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00253.html (8,476 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Category alignment [was: one stop (pass) grids] (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:35:09 -0600
If a Rover operates from a rare grid square on Saturday and conditions are dismal and I can't hear him or get his attention, we miss out. If he passes through the same grid on Sunday and conditions h
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00260.html (9,208 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Category alignment [was: one stop (pass) grids] (score: 1)
Author: Steve Clifford <k4gun.r@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:47:39 -0500
Another thing to consider is the casual rover. I'm not talking about the guy who plans a route that catches the corner of 11 different grids. I'm talking about the guy who has to work on Saturday and
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00262.html (10,166 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu