Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Fwiw\:\s+Cabrillo\s+Band\s+Designations\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Fwiw: Cabrillo Band Designations (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 10:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
According to the Cabrillo web page that I Googled, Cabrillo accepts only the following for band designations: Sadly, there is no Amateur allocation at 119G or 142G. Sadly, there is no Cabrillo design
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-04/msg00009.html (7,190 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Fwiw: Cabrillo Band Designations (score: 1)
Author: Walter - K5EST <walter.k5est@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:56:49 -0500
.. After reading the 70MHz.org description of "channelized" that was enough for me to not worry about getting on that band. 73....Walter - K5EST _______________________________________________ VHFcon
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-04/msg00010.html (7,493 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Fwiw: Cabrillo Band Designations (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 17:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Walter, 4-metres is available only in IARU Region 1; sort of like 222 and 902 being available only in IARU Region 3. :) Ev, W2EV _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting maili
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-04/msg00012.html (7,869 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Fwiw: Cabrillo Band Designations (score: 1)
Author: Walter - K5EST <walter.k5est@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:31:54 -0500
Hi Ev and all, Yup, I know the 4 meter band is not available for us to use. That is why I was surprised that you were even thinking of putting it in the Cabrillo. To me it is sort of "who cares". ...
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-04/msg00015.html (8,714 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Fwiw: Cabrillo Band Designations (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:58:06 -0500
I don't know much about the 70 MHz band, since it is available in EU but not in the USA. Is it a band used by contesters? Since Cabrillo is primarily used for contest logs, I'd have to ask that quest
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-04/msg00016.html (9,904 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Fwiw: Cabrillo Band Designations (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 09:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
Great thread, Walter! In fact, I'm thinking in terms of assembling a grass-roots effort to supplement CQ's excellent 2-band international contest with other contests, but based on km-DX rather than G
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-04/msg00017.html (8,491 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Fwiw: Cabrillo Band Designations (score: 1)
Author: Walter - K5EST <walter.k5est@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:17:23 -0500
.. ..............top reply................ .. Ev, I am all for your efforts to unify us with a simple logger. Actually if you can put together an easy to use international format then maybe it could
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-04/msg00028.html (9,603 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] Fwiw: Cabrillo Band Designations (score: 1)
Author: John Kemker <john@kemker.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:16:36 -0400
I've got an idea: Use XML. Forget the ancient ones who will say that XML was considered for Cabrillo but not used because it's harder to program for. There are SO many XML libraries out there that yo
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-04/msg00029.html (12,596 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] Fwiw: Cabrillo Band Designations (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
I will. However, as you said... So...I'm planning on supporting both, concurrently. :) Let's see how successful I can be. Ev, W2EV _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting maili
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-04/msg00038.html (8,557 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu