Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Icom\s+7000\s+as\s+a\s+VHF\s+contesting\s+rig\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Icom\s+7000\s+as\s+a\s+VHF\s+contesting\s+rig\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Icom 7000 as a VHF contesting rig (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <aa5jg@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:17:21 -0700 (PDT); What do list members think of the Icom 7000 as a VHF contesting rig? Yes, I know it has infitinely selectable filters but is it worth the extra money over a Yaesu FT857/FT897/FT100D or an Icom 706MKI; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-03/msg00070.html (7,200 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom 7000 as a VHF contesting rig (score: 1): Author: Sebastian <w4as@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:39:10 -0400; Unless you plan to use it mobile, I would spend an extra $100-$200 for what a used IC-7000 goes for, and get a used Kenwood TS-2000. I used to have an IC-7000, but found it gets very hot even in casu; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-03/msg00078.html (7,966 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]