Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Rover\s+to\s+Rover\s+Zero\s+Pts\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Rover to Rover Zero Pts (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Adams, PE" <k2qo@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:57:31 -0500
Calling all rovers! If rover-rover contacts are worth ZERO points, how many of you will continue to rove? Most rovers in the north east work many other rovers during a contest. Entering unlimited to
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00064.html (7,743 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover to Rover Zero Pts (score: 1)
Author: "John D'Ausilio" <jdausilio@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:09:38 -0500
Wouldn't affect my operations at all .. it's relatively rare that I work other rovers (unless we happen to meet at a commonly used spot) .. de w1rt/john ______________________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00065.html (7,272 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover to Rover Zero Pts (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:20:03 -0600
The thing I see being complained about here is the methods used by one or two groups to achieve massive scores. The methods more than the massive scores are the complaints. Are these so-called "lunch
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00071.html (10,050 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover to Rover Zero Pts (score: 1)
Author: Steve Clifford <k4gun.r@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:26:50 -0500
Yes there is. AF6O is a participant in the circling group in question. Although I'm not sure I want to characterize this discussion as a "complaint" about them. I think its more of a discussion about
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00072.html (8,212 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover to Rover Zero Pts (score: 1)
Author: jcplatt1@mmm.com
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:28:35 -0600
snip > At any given time out on the road, we have 1-5 other rovers in range. Nothing is more fun that working a VE rover across Lake Ontario in one grid and then again the next day in two other grids
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00073.html (8,712 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover to Rover Zero Pts (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:11:04 -0800
Mark, I think you got right to the heart of the matter. Clearly what is needed is a rule that would penalize the West coast rovers but still allow the North East rovers to have fun. Perhaps it could
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00077.html (9,497 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover to Rover Zero Pts (score: 1)
Author: Tom Carney <tomc@carneysugai.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:21:58 -0800
For me, this would likely be the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back. It definitely would move the CQ July contest to the top of my priority list, assuming they didn't adopt the same rule. 7
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00079.html (8,101 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu