Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n5nj@gte.net: 153 ]

Total 153 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 07:00:56 -0600
John, I sure do read that way, but I make the choice of when the page turns - not the book! If some people prefer this "feature", that's fine, but I totally dislike it. It's unnerving to see the lett
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00241.html (10,450 bytes)

62. RE: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 07:10:04 -0600
Hi Don & others: Thanks for your responses. Regarding the timed CQ - why is it's functionality different for rtty? The value there for CW is the "wait interval". Why not have it the same for rtty? Re
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00242.html (11,552 bytes)

63. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 08:22:34 -0600
Thanks to everyone for the encouragement to stick with the rttyrite scrolling. I'll hang in there with you guys for sure. Now, onto my "rigblaster" situation. The thing that threw me, was that I had
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00244.html (10,527 bytes)

64. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 12:57:44 -0600
That's right. The rig was being keyed by my LPT port setup (which bypasses the rigblaster direct to the rig), and the Rigblaster was not being keyed by the RS-232 port, despite having it selected in
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00257.html (10,981 bytes)

65. Re: [WriteLog] WIN2000 Question (score: 1)
Author: Bob Naumann - N5NJ <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:21:26 -0600
The key may be what speed the KAM defaults to. Perhaps it's different from what your Win2k install of Writelog is configured for? If it's not running at the same speed as you are "talking" it won't r
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00287.html (8,947 bytes)

66. Re: [WriteLog] Networking (score: 1)
Author: Bob Naumann - N5NJ <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 10:51:25 -0600
Bob, "It didn't work" is not descriptive enough to provide a step by step solution. I think the first question to ask, is were you able to do "normal" networking between all the computers involved, a
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00297.html (8,821 bytes)

67. Re: [WriteLog] Category (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 06:06:51 -0600
This reason it was rejected is the "CW" appended to the end of the category. This is only appropriate if the contest is like the IARU, where there are CW, SSB, or MIXED *categories*. This is a softw
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00330.html (8,264 bytes)

68. Re: [WriteLog] Function keys (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 07:20:22 -0600
I find all of this discussion interesting. I would suspect that most of those who are concerned about this run/s&p business may have come from a TR background. Those of us who used CT don't generally
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00366.html (11,356 bytes)

69. Re: [WriteLog] website address (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 07:30:52 -0600
The site he's looking for is http://www.microham.com/USB%20interfaces.html#model5 The Microham device is is a USB interface. The K1NU is a serial port interface. _____________________________________
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00367.html (9,604 bytes)

70. Re: [WriteLog] WL 10.45 new feature (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 18:50:21 -0600
DJ3IW Quoted N0AX in QST saying: . ".... Not-in-Log (N or NIL) - If your call does not appear in the other operator's log at the right time, your QSO is invalid." . That is correct. Nonetheless, if y
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00391.html (10,287 bytes)

71. Re: [WriteLog] FT1000D and writelog to top ten band decoder (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 17:19:35 -0600
Exactly. We have two of these setups at AA5NT. They work flawlessly. Drive it from the band data coming from the radio. This way, the bandpass filters will track the radio whether you have the comput
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00006.html (9,515 bytes)

72. Re: Re: [WriteLog] What should change in WriteLog w.r.t. this review? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Naumann - N5NJ <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 15:25:48 -0600
I must be missing something - what are you guys changing in the INI file when you change modes? I just change modes and make no changes. What am I doing wrong? -Bob -- Yes it would, and it would be a
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00048.html (10,233 bytes)

73. Re: Re: [WriteLog] What should change in WriteLog w.r.t. this review? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Naumann - N5NJ <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 11:03:27 -0600
No, as much as I hate this term: "My bad". I keep forgetting about RTTY. I see RTTY as so totally different, that I am not surprised that I have to change lots of things when I go to that mode. I did
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00071.html (11,064 bytes)

74. Re: Re: [WriteLog] CW to computer speaker? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Naumann - N5NJ <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:49:12 -0600
Can't you just turn off the radio's VOX or break-in switching so you don't actually transmit? Even so, what are you listening to hear? You enter what is to be sent as text. Can't you just review what
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00076.html (9,566 bytes)

75. Re: [WriteLog] Serial Card Question (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 08:27:05 -0600
Ric is right. TXD and RXD are the pins that send and receive data. Without them, the ports are useless - for rig control in this case. I doubt that you need these pins to control anything (PTT or FSK
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00125.html (8,990 bytes)

76. Re: [SPAM] RE: [WriteLog] Serial Card Question (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 17:04:40 -0600
First, let me apologize, as I was not familiar with the apparent "standard" of using the TXD output of a serial port for FSK purposes. I have reviewed the site: http://www.aa5au.com/rttyinterface.htm
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00145.html (19,208 bytes)

77. Re: [WriteLog] XP and laptop keying problems (score: 1)
Author: Bob Naumann - N5NJ <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:49:21 -0600
Paul, Check for something else talking to your LPT port - print buffer, palm pilot software - something. It could be some Compaq utility thing - they're known to do that. Under XP it should work perf
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00162.html (8,042 bytes)

78. Re: [WriteLog] LPT port keying from laptop (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:11:15 -0600
Can someone clarify exactly when this CW_ON_PIN1=1 [PORTS] parameter applies and when it does not? _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00186.html (8,943 bytes)

79. Re: [WriteLog] LPT port keying from laptop (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:14:31 -0600
Thanks John. I am hoping to find out when it applies to an LPT Port user or not. We had someone just today determine that this was his cure, but I don't have it in mine and yet it works perfectly. Wh
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00188.html (8,851 bytes)

80. Re: [WriteLog] Problem with MicroHam USB Interface (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:23:50 -0600
Does this only happen with RF present? What happens if you turn down your output power? _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://lists.cont
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00219.html (9,014 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu