Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:writelog@W1QA.com: 57 ]

Total 57 documents matching your query.

41. RE: [WriteLog] test message (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McCormick W1QA" <writelog@W1QA.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:47:28 -0500
Bruce: Messages being sent to YOU were being bounced? That would make sense - but not messages you sent to the list being bounced (back to you?) In any event - a quick look at the email headers of t
/archives//html/WriteLog/2003-12/msg00434.html (7,234 bytes)

42. RE: [WriteLog] Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McCormick W1QA" <writelog@W1QA.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:51:46 -0500
One of the steps is to: If this is not necessary I would suggest against this. In any event - be sure you NEVER attach a Windows based system directly to the Internet with the guest account enabled
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00317.html (9,913 bytes)

43. RE: [WriteLog] Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McCormick W1QA" <writelog@W1QA.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:54:09 -0500
This may in fact be true ... but unfortunately I can't try it myself as I've long ago abandoned Windows 9X platform. There are a number of security and other enhancements in the Windows XP implement
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00318.html (8,679 bytes)

44. RE: [WriteLog] Writelog and Dual Video (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McCormick W1QA" <writelog@W1QA.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:54:29 -0500
I'm a late comer to this thread ... I've had great luck with Matrox cards ... and their support is great as well. I prefer NOT to use software that combines all the monitors into one large virtual d
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00284.html (10,500 bytes)

45. RE: [WriteLog] Writelog and Dual Video (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McCormick W1QA" <writelog@W1QA.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:58:14 -0500
Maybe some of the very old Matrox cards would only present a single virtual desktop to the operating system, e.g. the union of all the monitors = desktop. But all the Matrox G-series cards I've used
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-02/msg00285.html (9,720 bytes)

46. RE: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McCormick W1QA" <writelog@W1QA.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:53:18 -0400
I too have been sitting back watching this thread. Interesting ... NetDDE and NetBIOS are depreciated things; they're still being supported in one form or another - but if you were to start from scra
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00249.html (13,717 bytes)

47. RE: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McCormick W1QA" <writelog@W1QA.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:30:34 -0400
Thanks Rob for your comments on my posting. I think the ideal situation would be probably similar to what exists today. Instead of a single, centralised server based architecture, one where all syste
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00264.html (10,935 bytes)

48. OT: New WriteLog enhanced TCP/IP Internet CQ WWW contest (was:[WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking) (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McCormick W1QA" <writelog@W1QA.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:44:44 -0400
I can't resist (though very much off topic) ... Maybe what we need is the new worm enhanced version of WriteLog for the new CQ WWW (World Wide Worm) contest. For a 48-hour period participants fire u
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00266.html (13,856 bytes)

49. RE: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McCormick W1QA" <writelog@W1QA.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:52:05 -0400
I wonder how many individuals' (e.g., non-business) systems are running Windows 2000 Professional? My observation had been that W2K Pro was pretty much deployed in a business environ but not that ma
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-06/msg00267.html (10,486 bytes)

50. RE: [WriteLog] Open Letter to Wayne - Networking (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McCormick W1QA" <writelog@W1QA.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 06:55:10 -0400
(snip) <AOL>Me Too</AOL> Except for #7 ... I think its reasonable to expect at some point features require a minimum configuration (h/w and/or s/w) that has certain necessary requirements: minimum C
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-07/msg00057.html (8,857 bytes)

51. RE: [WriteLog] Hard Drive Failure, THANKS (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McCormick W1QA" <writelog@W1QA.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 21:13:19 -0400
Likewise, sorry to hear it - and the impact. And though OT for this group - I'll share a couple of thoughts on the topic. PCI based IDE RAID adapters are quite cheap: a nice Promise card can be had
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-07/msg00096.html (10,088 bytes)

52. RE: [WriteLog] Hard Drive Failure, THANKS (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McCormick W1QA" <writelog@W1QA.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 08:13:51 -0400
Yes. Most right hand tab (at least on Windows XP Professional) is the Scheduled tab - uses built-in Windows scheduler to run backup scripts you setup at the times/dates desired. I guess that's becau
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-07/msg00102.html (10,165 bytes)

53. RE: [WriteLog] K3NA's WRITELOG SHORTCUTS (10.40J) on the web (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McCormick W1QA" <writelog@W1QA.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:38:44 -0400
Looks like it was created from a Word document using an old version of Acrobat (3.0?). I see some font mapping issues as well, with Adobe Reader 6 as well as an older version. Maybe you could get th
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-08/msg00017.html (8,192 bytes)

54. RE: [WriteLog] Revised Shortcuts PDF (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McCormick W1QA" <writelog@W1QA.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 22:54:09 -0400
http://www.tapr.org/~n5eg/index_files/WL_keyboard_shortcuts_K3NA_3-20-03.pdf Tom/Eric ... Thanks - its perfect now! _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@con
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-08/msg00036.html (6,853 bytes)

55. RE: [WriteLog] Re: Trouble installing 10.48 upgrade (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McCormick W1QA" <writelog@W1QA.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 11:57:48 -0400
I have to echo Jim AD1C's comments: I too have been running Windows XP with SP2, including pre-release (test) versions for quite some time and have done so without any issues, etc. It runs just fine
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00028.html (11,037 bytes)

56. RE: [WriteLog] Problem with XP service pack2? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McCormick W1QA" <writelog@W1QA.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 09:39:38 -0500
YMMV ... Windows XP SP2 probably has more bad press than its actual reputation warrants. In my shop we are deploying it without problem or fanfare; only a couple of non-critical applications have bee
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00021.html (9,480 bytes)

57. RE: [WriteLog] Soundcard worse after upgrade to XP (score: 1)
Author: "Bob McCormick W1QA" <writelog@W1QA.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 11:26:59 -0500
(sorry for the long quote) I've seen this kind of problem before ... and with Creative stuff as well. Often a manufacturer will have different versions of the same product ... silk screen on the boa
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-11/msg00027.html (9,534 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu