Mail Archive Search: <+from:Gilmer>

Results:

References: [ +from:Gilmer: 102 ]

Total 102 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] A caution (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 8 Dec 2001 16:38:59 -0800; No need to wait for the future, the robot currently informs those submitting logs if there was a problem. Recently (this past week), it was a bit too diligent regarding category and was rejecting Cab; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00011.html (7,773 bytes)
2. [ct-user] A caution (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 9 Dec 2001 06:49:31 -0800; I submitted my CW log on Dec 4 and a friend did so with a SSB log a few days earlier (Dec 2 or so). At both times the robot responded with automatic emails. Rumor has it the robot was already active; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00022.html (7,824 bytes)
3. [ct-user] CABRILLO (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 9 Dec 2001 11:36:49 -0800; Actually, the files are not all that similar. The "wrong" one has no summary info at the start. One is the old ARRL format (a somewhat predecessor to Cabrillo). Certainly it is no longer really neede; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00025.html (8,587 bytes)
4. [ct-user] CABRILLO (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 9 Dec 2001 11:48:14 -0800; Cabrillo is perfectly human readable - that's one of its virutes. It just has some header info at the top. Great for documenting just what the log is for. ____________________________________________; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00027.html (10,078 bytes)
5. [ct-user] CABRILLO (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 9 Dec 2001 17:40:14 -0800; The Cabrillo log is certainly suitable for that. Anyone can do a "cut" of the first few lines (summary); Excel even allows any number of initial lines to be left out of any import. Mike N2MG ________; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00036.html (11,359 bytes)
6. [ct-user] CT 969 in ARRL 160 (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 9 Dec 2001 17:46:10 -0800; I just ran 9.68 on ARRL 160. The .txt file was the Cabrillo. Mike N2MG ________________________________________________ PeoplePC: It's for people. And it's just smart. http://www.peoplepc.com; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00037.html (7,671 bytes)
7. [ct-user] Rate Window CQ-# (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 9 Dec 2001 17:53:50 -0800; It does not count the auto-repeat mode CQs. I would think they'd count the same along the lines of "If you aren't CQing, you're losing" (Rus credits K8DX with that, BTW) Mike N2MG ___________________; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00038.html (9,074 bytes)
8. [ct-user] No Score on SS Summary Ver 9.69 (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 14 Dec 2001 19:37:52 -0800; "All those files" ?? Lots of folks like looking at the various breakdowns sheets that CT (and others) dump out. That info is hard to glean from a quick glance at the Cabrillo log. Because the .SUM sh; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00068.html (7,948 bytes)
9. [ct-user] Ten Meter Contest (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 14 Dec 2001 20:41:56 -0800; The usual question asked at this stage is, "Are you running CT in a DOS window, or did you boot to DOS?" Booting to DOS: Good Running CT in DOS window: Bad 'Course this is not relevant to CTWIN. Mike; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00071.html (7,312 bytes)
10. [ct-user] 9.47 (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 18 Dec 2001 08:12:50 -0800; I'm don't recall what, if anything, was wrong with 9.47's Cabrillo output. If you aren't familiar with what a Cabrillo log look like, you may have actually sent the wrong file. Did you look it over -; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00088.html (7,385 bytes)
11. [ct-user] Cabrillo Output (have I missed something ?) (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 30 Dec 2001 21:02:17 -0800; Try this when in doubt (at DOS prompt) dir /o-d This will list the files in order (/o), by date (d), newest first(-). Obviously the newest files are the program's output. 73 Mike N2MG _______________; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-12/msg00136.html (8,080 bytes)
12. [ct-user] Let's talk about CT networking (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 8 Nov 2001 10:19:50 -0800; Ciprian, Welcome to the list. Absolutely the first thing you need to do is to NOT start CT in a window. Boot directly to DOS and then proceed with running CT. 73 Mike N2MG ___________________________; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00031.html (9,607 bytes)
13. [ct-user] Let's talk about CT networking (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 8 Nov 2001 16:56:41 -0800; I don't understand. Was your question hypothetical, or did you experience an actual problem? If you run CT from a DOS window, you are virtually assured to eventually have problems ESPECIALLY when dea; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00035.html (8,719 bytes)
14. [ct-user] Let's talk about CT networking (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 8 Nov 2001 17:07:27 -0800; BTW, there's no database to restore; if there are network outages during the contest then after the contest you'll need to run MERGE to create the final log from the logs stored on each node. ** This; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00036.html (8,143 bytes)
15. [ct-user] Let's talk about CT networking (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 8 Nov 2001 17:40:25 -0800; I should have mentioned that you can do this DURING the 'test as well. It's just more of a "panic" then as the PCs go offline to do the merge. If you write some simple batch files, you can speed up t; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00037.html (8,627 bytes)
16. [ct-user] half my QSOs need the time shifted 12 hours (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 12 Nov 2001 08:21:08 -0800; Sounds to me like you need to generate two text files - one with no shift, and one with 12-hour shift. Then merge them in a text editor, replacing the incorrect entries with a single block cut-and-pa; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00065.html (8,634 bytes)
17. [ct-user] Re: Super Check Partial Window (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 17 Nov 2001 05:19:34 -0800; I'm virtually certain that one MUST use a mouse to position the windows AND that the positions are stored in the .bin file. It's been recommended on this reflector (N5NJ for one) that a good way to r; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00090.html (8,519 bytes)
18. [ct-user] CT9.68 Score reporting (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 26 Nov 2001 10:16:43 -0800; 1) My summary sheet showed no score when generated at home. I took the .bin file to work and re-ran it and indeed the score appeared. 2) My Cabrillo file had the contest listed as SSB. Here's part of; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00153.html (9,125 bytes)
19. [ct-user] Re: CT Default Bin File (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 26 Nov 2001 11:35:51 -0800; I haven't found the need to have separate bin files. Perhaps if there are significant differences you want to maintain (like window locations), but I always use the same one. If you actually populate; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00154.html (11,382 bytes)
20. [ct-user] Couple of CT Questions (score: 1): Author: n2mg@contesting.com (Mike Gilmer - N2MG); Date: 26 Nov 2001 11:48:06 -0800; The TR website allows one to download the manual (it's a ~1Meg PDF). Go to: http://www.qth.com/tr/ and click on "MANUAL" Buried near the end (page 165 or so) is a diagram. I believe it's the same for; /archives//html/CT-User/2001-11/msg00155.html (9,588 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]