Mail Archive Search: <+from:Hare>

Results:

References: [ +from:Hare: 599 ]

Total 599 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] FCC Booklet (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Tue Aug 5 13:01:29 2003; All of the new and out-of-print FCC material is among the links available at: http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/rfi-info-fcc.html 73, Ed Hare, W1RFI ARRL Lab 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 Tel: 860-594-0; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00014.html (7,207 bytes)
2. [RFI] Video (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Fri Aug 8 20:47:54 2003; Maybe so, but many an electric utility company whose noise has been well below S9+30 dB has received correspondence from ARRL, then from Riley. See http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/plc/FCC_enforceme; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00036.html (10,583 bytes)
3. [RFI] BPL video FAQs (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Fri Aug 8 21:23:34 2003; Hi, guys and gals, Well, it was me that done it, with the help of 160,000 hams who have helped make sure ARRL has resources to do this sort of thing. Thanks to all who helped make it happen. I couldn; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00037.html (13,702 bytes)
4. [RFI] Video (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Sat Aug 9 09:08:32 2003; So far, from our best info, about 60% of the cases are resolved. A few are poised to go to more rigorous enforcement steps, but that needs to be done absolutely flawlessly, at least for the first few; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00041.html (13,522 bytes)
5. [RFI] Video (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Sat Aug 9 09:10:49 2003; Glad to hear it. You are one of the 60%. Five years ago, had anyone said that anyone could make a 60% dent in the power line noise problem, it would have seemed an impossible dream. Like a chess game; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00042.html (14,575 bytes)
6. [RFI] RE: No More Nice Guy? (was BPL video FAQs) (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Mon Aug 11 16:27:39 2003; The sole claims to the lack of interference problems are that they comply with Part 15 (Part 15 = S9 noise on HF, under typical circumstances) and that they have had no reports of interference. The; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00073.html (10,392 bytes)
7. [RFI] Broadband over Power Line Video Conferance (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Mon Aug 11 16:36:19 2003; I looked into it, and it looks like a mareketing conference. It would have cost ARRL over a grand, with travel and the conference costs. I decided to spend the members' money somewhere else. :-) 73,; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00074.html (13,442 bytes)
8. [RFI] RE: Concerning BPL video (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Mon Aug 11 16:51:29 2003; Then I have to wonder what you may have heard that you thought was BPL, Mike. The signals recorded in test area #1 were recorded while the involved amateur's BPL modem was downloading a streaming vi; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00075.html (14,402 bytes)
9. [RFI] RE: Concerning BPL video (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Mon Aug 11 16:53:41 2003; For the most part, this industry has been very tight lipped about BPL trials and their specific locations. When I told the folks in Potomac that I was going to their system to check its interference; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00076.html (10,200 bytes)
10. [RFI] RE: Concerning BPL video (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Mon Aug 11 16:56:00 2003; Mike is sincere in his beliefs. He has looked at only one system, and is drawing his conclusions from what he has seen. He may be proven incorect, but his post was not a troll; it was intended to be; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00077.html (14,305 bytes)
11. [RFI] RE: Concerning BPL video (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Mon Aug 11 17:02:12 2003; Do I presume you have downloaded the ARRL video? Those "several narrowband inside noise sources" seen in test area #4 are better desrcribed as "several hundred." Those birdies are spaced about every; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00078.html (12,768 bytes)
12. [RFI] RE: Concerning BPL video (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Mon Aug 11 17:23:54 2003; I have thought of a few more points to add. In test area #1, the system is "HomePlug" notched. This system has little energy in the ham bands, except for the new allocation at 5.3 MHz. In that area,; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00079.html (15,907 bytes)
13. [RFI] RE: Concerning BPL video (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Mon Aug 11 17:49:11 2003; What PLC systems operate on amateur spectrum? I know of only one, and it serves as a good case history of what to expect. It, too, complied with the FCC limits, but operated on 3.53 MHz http://www.a; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00080.html (18,252 bytes)
14. [RFI] Re: [TowerTalk] Comment on Radar Engineers Model 240 (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Mon Aug 11 20:08:54 2003; Absolutely; he should buy it! And he should go to RFI Service's training seminar, too. For some customer feedback on both, contact Mike Gruber at ARRL HQ. Please QSP this to Tower Talk as I am not on; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00082.html (9,806 bytes)
15. [RFI] RE: Concerning BPL video (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Tue Aug 12 19:57:07 2003; I converted the video to a .wav file and ran it through an oscilloscope to get a signature. A bit of audio clipping somewhere in the process, but the signature is clearly not sparking. http://www.ar; /archives//html/RFI/2003-08/msg00087.html (12,127 bytes)
16. [RFI] Two meter interference (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Wed Jun 11 17:10:40 2003; ARRL's info on cable TVI may help: http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/catvi/index.html This is a 3-part article that was first published in Communications Technology, the journal of the Society of Cab; /archives//html/RFI/2003-06/msg00031.html (9,708 bytes)
17. [RFI] RE: Another "no interference" conclusion. . . (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Wed Jun 11 17:14:49 2003; To date, DSL has not caused hams any problems, but it stops a 1.1 MHz, though it will soon be going higher. But twisted-pair telephone wiring is a much poorer antenna than overhead power lines, so th; /archives//html/RFI/2003-06/msg00032.html (10,881 bytes)
18. [RFI] RE: A Serious Threat (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Wed Jun 11 17:18:37 2003; There are a number of BLP architectures. Some use fiber to get signals to a neighborhood, then a combination of the medium voltage lines on the poles and the low voltage lines in the house to get to; /archives//html/RFI/2003-06/msg00033.html (9,441 bytes)
19. [RFI] alternative to PLC (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Wed Jun 11 17:22:07 2003; Yeah, but infrastructure is still required. In some cases, the power company has to run fiber to the neighborhood. In others, they use the MV lines, but have to put digital repeaters about every 2000; /archives//html/RFI/2003-06/msg00034.html (11,677 bytes)
20. [RFI] re: BPL (score: 1): Author: w1rfi at arrl.org (Hare,Ed, W1RFI); Date: Wed Jun 11 17:23:18 2003; Technically, the stuff can work. In the trial areas, people are reporting an improvement over dialup, although how that will play when there are dozens of hundreds of users trying to shove data down; /archives//html/RFI/2003-06/msg00035.html (9,924 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]