Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:K7GCO@aol.com: 206 ]

Total 206 documents matching your query.

61. [TowerTalk] ratings on wire rope (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 03:06:00 EDT
<< with pull. 1,000# A questions for the physics experts -- Is it true that in order to pull up the 1000# load that the pull will have to be 1000# plus the amount to overcome the loss due to the pull
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00159.html (9,509 bytes)

62. [TowerTalk] Resonance of loaded Parasitic Elements (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 08:51:08 EDT
<< A 5% lower resonant frequency for the reflector is a good place to start. It seems to me that one way to do this is to split and insulate the reflector and then either grid dip the element or meas
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00208.html (9,647 bytes)

63. [TowerTalk] Hy-Gain AV-18HT (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 00:53:52 EDT
<< Any first hand experience with the Hy-Gain AV-18HT ??? 73's Larry WA2SRY Several years with it from day one. What do you want to know? k7gco List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN Wireless handles Rohn
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00264.html (7,071 bytes)

64. [TowerTalk] Low Band Verticals (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 02:30:00 EDT
In a message dated 9/6/01 5:00:11 PM Pacific Daylight Time, rgagos@home.com writes:<< My first posting to the list, and after lurking for several days, I must say I'm impressed with the civility! As
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00266.html (12,917 bytes)

65. [TowerTalk] Wonder how 4El Gem Quad compares to other 4El Quads? (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 02:51:45 EDT
<< I'm just wondering how they compare in performance?????? Jack I presume you are interested in comparisons with current 80/75/40M verticals. The present ones weren't around when I used the HT-18 Hy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00267.html (8,206 bytes)

66. [TowerTalk] 2dB or not 2 be dB (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 12:14:08 EDT
Rx end? My guess is that for moonbounce, 2db would make the difference between being heard or not. However, in my double-blind test of 40m daytime skywave with normal QSB,, no one could see the diffe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00283.html (9,268 bytes)

67. [TowerTalk] Re: your article on the HT-18 Mod (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 12:17:44 EDT
No I don't and all my stuff is packed for my move to SD. Go to the archives and look udner Hy tower. It as discussed in the past and the date was mentioned. Perhaps someone else will remember. k7gco
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00284.html (7,274 bytes)

68. [TowerTalk] guy rod angle (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:41:42 EDT
Let me tell you, my Static's professor (Is that old fossil still alive??) would be proud that I even remember as much of what he taught me as I've already told you. We're really digging into the dark
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00290.html (12,334 bytes)

69. [TowerTalk] Quad Element Tuning (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 13:03:55 EDT
Amen. You can burn a LOT of time twiddling with the tuning. That's why I switched to yagis. Cheers, Steve K7LXC Tower Tech There is a lot of truth to this--howsomever. This is the year 2001 and some
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00311.html (13,656 bytes)

70. [TowerTalk] Quad Element Tuning (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 16:19:39 EDT
sit able Great email ! As I don't have access to 73 mag., is there any chance of being emailed the photo, or seeing it on the web ?? I am thinking of adding a quad section to my website, and this mig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00315.html (14,794 bytes)

71. [TowerTalk] Quad Element Tuning (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 16:43:58 EDT
I don't know what Steve meant, I know that even a 2L multiband quad is a challenge and final F/B fair when some band is close to each other or harmonically related. Modeling and tests proved to me t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00316.html (11,492 bytes)

72. [TowerTalk] Quad Element Tuning (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 19:41:29 EDT
<< Also had problems with adding 12m quad to a 10-15-17-20M 4 element GEM quad. These four bands coexisted very well even with a single feedline. Looked at it in AO and the patterns on all four bands
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00323.html (11,996 bytes)

73. [TowerTalk] Quad Element Tuning (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 20:14:31 EDT
In a message dated 9/8/01 2:33:54 PM Pacific Daylight Time, i4jmy@iol.it writes: << Place a 12m director in front of the 10m driven and see what happens using your modeling software, or roughly check
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00324.html (9,797 bytes)

74. [TowerTalk] Quad Element Tuning (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:09:45 EDT
In a message dated 9/9/01 1:21:29 AM Pacific Daylight Time, i4jmy@iol.it writes: << I like plain and reliable systems, expecially with antennas. If I where to install a single 5 bands antenna coverin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00373.html (19,125 bytes)

75. [TowerTalk] Thrust bearing (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 01:47:06 EDT
In a message dated 9/8/01 5:53:55 PM Pacific Daylight Time, barrie@centric.net writes:<< Hello: My previous question regarding a thrust bearing for a Telex Hy-Gain HG70-HD did not yield much response
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00391.html (8,959 bytes)

76. [TowerTalk] TH6 SWR on 10m (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 17:05:26 EDT
In a message dated 9/15/01 10:41:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time, ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca writes:<< Has anyone ever had the "resonant" dip on their TH6 appear way down on 27.6 Mhz or lower? I have a TH6 @ 42'
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00464.html (14,616 bytes)

77. [TowerTalk] TH6 SWR on 10m (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 19:13:41 EDT
In a message dated 9/15/01 2:53:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time, smlx@earthlink.net writes:<< My TH7 is at 65 feet. Resonance is as per the manual settings. If my tower is lowered, the resonance shifts.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00468.html (7,903 bytes)

78. [TowerTalk] Need ideas for 80M "traps" or "coil" (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:33:54 EDT
<< Hi Frank, This is what I did to make a *USEFUL* "dip" circuit for my MFJ 259-B. Of course it should work with other RF generators too, but the MFJ (or equivalent) is hard to beat for convenience a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00488.html (12,466 bytes)

79. [TowerTalk] What is the advantage to drilling the spreader to attach wires? (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:40:50 EDT
<< If there is any? Ive seen the way Lighting Bolt attaches the wire through small tubes and hose clamps. I have seen where using that way lets the spreaders sometime get out of alignment beacause th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00489.html (8,019 bytes)

80. [TowerTalk] Dipping with 259B and such (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 17:51:32 EDT
<< How about some suggestions for a grid dipper adequate for amateur use. There appears to be limited choices. Howard M. Klein, K2HK DXCC Honor Roll 362 Confirmed Countries A1 Operators' Club The Mil
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00506.html (8,560 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu