Results:
References: [ +from:K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net: 1378 ]
Total 1378 documents matching your query.
- 1. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotatator Lubes (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:09:18 -0500
- I now use white Lithium grease in most of these applications. It's good and it stands up to the elements quite well. I have a rather large array "up there" and went through a pair of HDR-300s in just
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00015.html (8,580 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Open wire lines (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:02:10 -0500
- Hmm... Interesting, I didn't expect to actually end up with a superscript. I used the "up arrow" to indicate superscript and the posting actually turned it into superscript. 73 Roger (K8RI) _________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00535.html (9,838 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Shack to antennas distance (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:58:56 -0500
- Distance from rig to base of tower, 100' Rig to antennas ~228' Feedlines to tower for all bands LMR-600 in underground conduit. 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ _______
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00534.html (7,805 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TowerTalk] Open wire lines (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:41:29 -0500
- Try ZO^2 which is an accepted way of writing exponents when the super script is not available. 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ ________________________________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00528.html (8,940 bytes)
- 5. Re: [TowerTalk] Bumps in coax, choosing coax (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:38:55 -0500
- Yes they are good prices. The two new connectors I had were the L44P 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00504.html (15,015 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TowerTalk] Bumps in coax, choosing coax (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:25:32 -0500
- I just gave away 200 feet of LDF4-50 with two new connectors. Often you can find it used, in good shape "with connectors" for very little. Of course when looking for heliax I look for the 7/8" as at
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00501.html (11,770 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TowerTalk] Bumps in coax (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:26:26 -0500
- I thought splices would show up as a ring or series of closely spaced rings. When he said "bumps" that had me thinking a a round bump, or "pimple" on the jacket and I've never seen a splice look like
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00495.html (8,692 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax type selection (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:47:33 -0500
- Thanks Tom, I'd like to add that although they are much less prone to water ingress, none of the regular cables are immune to moisture and damage with the exception of direct burial cable which has a
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00484.html (8,941 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TowerTalk] Bumps in coax (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:34:30 -0500
- Man, a guy who runs enough power to melt the coax.<:-)) Had any nearby lightning strikes? I take it that you are sure these were not there at the installation time so are not an artifact of productio
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00482.html (9,094 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax type selection (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:36:36 -0500
- I used to say that, but then a lightning strike took off all the tape and coax seal at the top of the tower. 15 minuets later I water running out of the one rig and onto the desk top. Ruined the desk
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00477.html (10,064 bytes)
- 11. Re: [TowerTalk] Water in Coax (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:06:47 -0500
- Did you start at the bottom and work up? If so the problem should be at or just below the point where the shield turns shiny. It gradually turns gray with water and water *usually* works down the coa
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00464.html (7,595 bytes)
- 12. Re: [TowerTalk] Cable Glands (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:33:45 -0500
- The cheap plastic ones are not only fine, but are far superior to the metal ones normally used for inside work as they rust quickly and badly. They also form a better seal between the cabinet and gla
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00460.html (8,325 bytes)
- 13. Re: [TowerTalk] Cable Glands (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:17:11 -0500
- I've been using them for a long time, but my use is only for rotator and control cables. Coax OTOH almost always goes through bulkhead connectors to ground the shield at the enclosure. In theory that
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00458.html (9,317 bytes)
- 14. Re: [TowerTalk] Identifying Aluminum Tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:08:43 -0500
- There are some odd ball "cheap knockoffs" that use 8' sections as well, but few are 22" wide and the Aluminum is soft. 73 Roger (K8RI) _______________________________________________ ________________
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00456.html (9,454 bytes)
- 15. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotating a dipole on a side-arm (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:06:22 -0500
- Emergencies covering wide areas, and/or direct communications with headquarters of participating agencies at a distance. We run all bands up through SHF with maybe the exception of 160 73 Roger (K8RI
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00455.html (11,000 bytes)
- 16. Re: [TowerTalk] 2 Element Parasitic Vertical for 160M (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:03:55 -0500
- Granted and over simplification, but: Gain and F/B are determined by the phase angle and coupling between the elements. IOW the phase between the driven element and the reflector is such that the sig
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00423.html (10,408 bytes)
- 17. Re: [TowerTalk] How Helically Wound Verticals Really Work (was : Vertical dipoles) (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:23:27 -0500
- This post should have shown up yesterday, but instead of converting to plain text it bounced which I didn't receive until this evening. Working a lot with both materials I seriously doubt the above s
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00385.html (12,672 bytes)
- 18. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn catalog not free (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:58:16 -0500
- It used to be... Boy, but I'll bet she has a pile of requests. OTOH isn't it still posted on their site as a PDF? I downloaded the previous copy. My other two were given to me on request. 73 Roger (K
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00373.html (8,225 bytes)
- 19. Re: [TowerTalk] How Helically Wound Verticals Really Work (was : Vertical dipoles) (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:55:44 -0500
- Hardly. I'm comparing a lumped inductance in the center to turning the entire antenna (or most of it) into one long linear loaded antenna. Yes, that's what center loaded does to get the required indu
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00372.html (10,079 bytes)
- 20. Re: [TowerTalk] How Helically Wound Verticals Really Work (was : Vertical dipoles) (score: 1)
- Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:27:14 -0500
- But a center loaded vertical has a high profile, high wind drag, and is more fragile than the helically wound vertical. Some times that is a problem and sometimes it is not. If not, then the decision
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00358.html (10,747 bytes)
Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by
Namazu