Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Rick@DJ0IP.de: 3271 ]

Total 3271 documents matching your query.

161. RE: [TenTec] Occupied Bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 06:00:24 +0100
Thanks Eric but I don't get QST over here. --Original Message-- From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Eric F. Richards Sent: Saturday, February 14, 20
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00434.html (11,038 bytes)

162. [TenTec] Problems with latest firmware download (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:34:44 +0100
When I try to run the downloaded update, I get the following error message: "Can't find C:MYDOWN~1.ORIONU~1.cfg" This is my first attempt at upgrading my ORION's firmware. Am I doing something wrong?
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00452.html (7,672 bytes)

163. RE: [TenTec] Omni V , aux relay (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:58:11 +0100
Lowell, You can turn the relay "On" or "Off" in the software menu. It is probably turned off and only needs to be turned on. I don't have an Omni V anymore so you'll have to check in the handbook for
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00457.html (8,314 bytes)

164. RE: [TenTec] Amplifier Decision??? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:53:09 +0100
Only need two tubes (572B) for the 600w. Why not pick up a used Centaur? Basically the same amp as an 811H but with Ten-Tec quality, built-in QSK, and set up to work with all Ten-Tec rigs. You can pi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00469.html (9,430 bytes)

165. RE: [TenTec] Problems with latest firmware download (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 07:12:22 +0100
J, Gud thinking thru the problem. I had already placed the file in a dedicated folder and tried. I shortened the file's name to 8 characters and tried to run it. I get the exact same error message. A
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00480.html (10,602 bytes)

166. RE: [TenTec] Problems with latest firmware download (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:11:39 +0100
Thanks to all who attempted to assist me today. My email has been down all day and just now came back up. The status is still the same: the upgrade has not yet completed successfully. I've checked bo
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00496.html (8,424 bytes)

167. [TenTec] UPDATE SUCCESSFUL: TNX ERIC ! (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:23:13 +0100
And of course TNX to all of the others who helped. The reason my update did not run from the laptop is because I had (in setup) the box ticked for "stop if error". I unticked that box and the update
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00517.html (8,036 bytes)

168. [TenTec] ORION Serial Cable (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:22:06 +0100
Hey guys, I just packed my ORION back into its box and sent it to one of our MULTI-SINGLE contest sites for the upcoming CQ160m SSB contest. SURPRISE: I found a Serial cable inside the box. I feel ki
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00553.html (8,054 bytes)

169. RE: [TenTec] Ten Tec Omni D, Why so quiet ? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 23:17:23 +0100
Richard, Reverse the order, then I agree. The preselector really did make a big difference. Ten-Tec didn't invent it. All radios used to have them. Others just quit too soon. Next, at the risk of bei
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00573.html (12,889 bytes)

170. RE: [TenTec] Ten Tec Omni D, Why so quiet ? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 23:35:51 +0100
Chuck, you've got it! Full 10 pts. It's really a shame the vendors stopped doing that. In the meantime, preselectors are coming back "in" again: - one of the latest FT-1000's - Icom 703 Let's hope ot
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00575.html (8,849 bytes)

171. [TenTec] BIG ORION Weakness: (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 23:39:25 +0100
Without a doubt, this is one very WEAK point that Ten-Tec forgot about in their planning of the ORION. As I said in an earlier post, I have loaned out my Orion to a contest team for an upcoming conte
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00576.html (7,604 bytes)

172. RE: [TenTec] Corsair II to Collins 30L-1 amp -- any issues? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:31:12 +0100
Hi Adam, Ken's answer was an outstanding explanation of what all you might expect, in general, but you didn't get any specific answers to your questions (from anybody). Perhaps nobody here runs that
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00625.html (12,370 bytes)

173. RE: [TenTec] Orion Band Data connection (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:12:56 +0100
Yes, you are missing something ;-) Besides switching bands on amplifiers, there are numerous accessories which need to be band switched (e.g., remote antenna switches and external bandpass filters).
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00629.html (8,463 bytes)

174. RE: [TenTec] Lock the 2.4 KHz Roofing Filter? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:03:32 +0100
Bernard, You have had several recommendations now. There are good arguments for both sides of the story. For contests and really serious work, I would lock it in at 2.4 kHz. However, for day-to-day o
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00647.html (9,550 bytes)

175. RE: [TenTec] Old Vs. New Technology (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 08:08:30 +0100
One small point, [almost] ALL older rigs, Ten-Tec or otherwise had a minor blemish when trying to work split with a large difference in TX and RX frequency. Since they had a built-in preselector, you
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00663.html (7,870 bytes)

176. [TenTec] ARGOSY Dial Cord Problems (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:29:46 +0100
My ARGOSY (Analog) dial cord and 100 kHz indicator have finally died. Apparently I have to remove the front panel to fix it. I'm pretty sure I'm going to need parts so I have decided I'll order whate
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00669.html (8,061 bytes)

177. RE: [TenTec] FS - Omni C, PS, VFO, D104 (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:48:15 +0100
Jeff, Sorry, I forgot to say, I don't need the D-104 either, although I fine that mic lovely! Rick _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00684.html (7,473 bytes)

178. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 14:28:04 +0100
John, The advantage of the Jupiter is the ability to control it by software (e.g., N4PY), and its flexible DSP filters. The advantage of the Omni VI is its ultimate ability to pull in weak signals un
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00734.html (8,932 bytes)

179. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter vs 746 PRO (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:59:58 +0100
" after perusing the reviews on eHam I find that many 746 Pro owners like the radio and its features" opinions of people who do (or have) owned both. Lots of people write lots of unqualified things a
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00742.html (10,519 bytes)

180. RE: [TenTec] Orion tuner Question (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Westerman" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 05:46:06 +0100
Yes, I noticed that too. After tuning my linear (using the Tune button and no built-in AT), when I keyed under normal power, it took a couple of dits or dahs until the power came up to snuff. But rea
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00756.html (8,000 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu