Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W4EF@dellroy.com: 686 ]

Total 686 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [TowerTalk] KT34XA Torque Balance (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:08:31 -0800
One caution, Red - John W0UN sent me an email letting me know that the portion of Leeson's book that describes the need to torque balance elements with dummy elements is incorrect. It seems that Dick
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00214.html (9,839 bytes)

322. Re: [TowerTalk] Torque balancing made easy,was kt34xa torque balancing (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 17:53:18 -0800
a Well in my case, I think we may be pushing the limits of the rotor and tower. Its a long story as to why, but the two KLM antennas in our stack (40M4 and KT34XA) have the 3" OD x 1/4 wall "ICE" boo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00240.html (10,887 bytes)

323. [TowerTalk] Source for RG6 Coax (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:47:25 -0800
I am looking for a good source for RG-6 for an upcoming RX antenna project. I need quick turnaround (stocking supplier) and a good price (I need 1000 feet). My preference would be single shield (95%
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00292.html (7,467 bytes)

324. Re: [TowerTalk] Source for RG6 Coax (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:20:50 -0800
Thanks to all who replied to my query about RG-6. I was able to find a suitable supplier and get an order placed. Next time I will start my search sooner so that I have time to chase the free stuff f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00321.html (8,728 bytes)

325. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Downloading terrain data for use with HFTA (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:15:55 -0800
suspect off elevation A couple of comments. With regard to locating your towers, I suggest you checkout the program Radio Mobile: http://www.cplus.org/rmw/english1.html It allows you to overall 1 met
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00458.html (11,306 bytes)

326. Re: [TowerTalk] Station Ground (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:32:19 -0800
I got a long piece of 1" copper water pipe and put wooden dowel rod inside. Then I drilled holes all the way through the pipe every few inches for pipe from deforming too much when I tighten the scre
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00516.html (10,554 bytes)

327. Re: [TowerTalk] Station Ground (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:33:01 -0800
Gary, That might be true if each piece of equipment in the shack was totally isolated from every other piece of equipment. In reality there are all kinds of incidental chassis connection between gea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00548.html (10,846 bytes)

328. Re: [TowerTalk] Station Ground (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 08:38:41 -0800
Okay, I'll bite, Tom. Why is it stupid to run the negative lead from my rig directly to the battery? I did this in my truck. Is the main concern failure of the main chassis to battery negative connec
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00574.html (11,033 bytes)

329. Re: [TowerTalk] Station Ground (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 07:45:17 -0800
How are most factory installed radio's and other accessories wired up? Do they use a dedicated return wire to the battery or are they all chassis returned. If anyone would have the insight and experi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00598.html (11,228 bytes)

330. Re: [TowerTalk] Station Ground (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 09:39:23 -0800
I just remembered that there are these excerpts from factory 2-way radio installations guidlines for Ford, GM, and Crysler in the ARRL RFI Handbook. Here is a summary of what they recommend: FORD: "T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00605.html (12,982 bytes)

331. Re: [TowerTalk] There's 'ground', and then there's 'ground' (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 08:35:23 -0800
You'll also see braid used in ESD sensitive environments for ground along workbenches and such. Its flexible and easy to connect to with an alligator clip if you need to ground something or someone.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00679.html (9,931 bytes)

332. Re: [TowerTalk] Need advice on effects of trees (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:44:52 -0800
in the 70 to 80 foot high range. They include ponderosa and sugar pine, white pine and Douglas firs. Am considering a tower for a yagi or quad and as a support for wire antennas and am wondering how
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01039.html (9,275 bytes)

333. Re: [TowerTalk] Trees, Mountains, 15 degrees... (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:36:00 -0800
Pete are you sure that is correct? I thought HFTA would do 149 terrain points at whatever spacing provided, the tradeoff being fine structure detail versus distance covered. Mike, W4EF..............
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01072.html (8,942 bytes)

334. Re: [TowerTalk] Trees, Mountains, 15 degrees... (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:55:51 -0800
Jim, et al: I wonder if HFTA would have any problems with unevenly spaced points. If you have a mountain that is 15 miles away with a flat plain in between, you really want to conserve those 149 poin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01078.html (10,082 bytes)

335. Re: [TowerTalk] quick waterproofing for PL-259 connectors? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 09:07:34 -0800
How about coming up into mating connector from the bottom and then installing a rain hat over the mating connector so that the rain can't get to the connector interface (imagine the top end of a 2 li
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00194.html (10,637 bytes)

336. Re: [TowerTalk] quick waterproofing for PL-259 connectors? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:58:39 -0800
use. the It just occurred to me that those orange traffic cones would work really well if you capped the tops of the cones so the water woudn't run through. They are weighted so they won't fall over
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00237.html (12,097 bytes)

337. Re: multishields in CATV was Re: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] RG-11 Source? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 21:41:39 -0800
from corresponds Generally I think the carrier levels on analog coaxial trunks are set at something like +33dBmV/carrier (~-15dBm). You can't run the carriers much higher on the trunks or the cumulat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00302.html (14,732 bytes)

338. Re: [TowerTalk] 1020 DOM MAST (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:16:06 -0800
Hi Jose, Looks like 1020 DOM has a yield strength of around 60,000 ksi. That is going to be somewhere between 1/3 and 1/2 the strength of a good chrome moly alloy mast with the same cross section. Le
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00328.html (9,613 bytes)

339. Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole Longer or higher? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:35:32 -0800
I would expect the shorter antenna to have a higher current maximum due to a lower radiation resistance. The longer antenna should have a lower current maximum, but the current will be distributed ov
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00376.html (10,627 bytes)

340. Re: [TowerTalk] World Class Station Conundrum - help! (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 08:33:30 -0800
If you want to be competitive on the low bands, Scott, the most important thing to consider is your ability to hear weak stations. Given the choice for example between a 300 ft tower in your current
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00387.html (11,038 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu