Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:W4NZ@comcast.net: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [TowerTalk] Archeological find in my Anchor hole (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 13:27:26 -0400
Uh-oh, I see where this is headed...next thing, someone will ask about T-- N--!!! continents shoot _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00190.html (9,776 bytes)

2. Re:[TowerTalk] MARC Software (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:09:03 -0400
And if you need further verification, or different units, check out: http://www.pitt.edu/~rsup/touqueconv.html _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00768.html (8,274 bytes)

3. RE: [TowerTalk] spider balls.. they work (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:03:19 -0400
Well, since we seem to have squeezed out about all the technical aspects of this and transitioned to a lighter vein, let me offer one more consideration why the "spider balls" may be misunderstood. H
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00991.html (7,971 bytes)

4. RE: [TowerTalk] Wilson 5 element 20 meter monobander (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 15:28:03 -0400
Tim and Jim are correct. A 40-ft boom on 20M is a little short for five elements. However, someone once said that sometimes you just gotta use what you got. So, if you have a fairly recent copy of th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00155.html (9,137 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Email Test - Pls Disregard (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:06:22 -0400
Test de W4NZ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg01059.html (6,656 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Attn all comcast subscribers (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 19:43:40 -0400
We weren't the only group experiencing problems with Comcast... http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/15393026.htm 73, Ted W4NZ excessive bounces. The last bounce was received on 28-Aug-2006. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00104.html (8,647 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Where does the element go? (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:17:17 -0500
If I remember my Statics & Dynamics correctly, the gravitational forces on a horizontal element(and the resulting torque on the boom) are the same whether it's mounted above or below the boom. For a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00634.html (8,642 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Pucker Power (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:23:54 -0500
Ed said: "...Jeff looks to me like a talented and smart tower climber to not be overcome with fear but with respect for it..." - indeed. This antenna installation has an inherently large natural "puc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00283.html (9,304 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] New Tower Rohn 45 (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 20:07:20 -0400
"...Which would you put on the top of the Mast ? ..." The one least likely to require maintenance. 73, Ted W4NZ I putting up about 100 foot Rohn 45, Two antennas One is a 2 Ele 40 meter beam and a 3
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00418.html (7,680 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Re: 90 ft. rohn 25 stupidity!!! - clarification (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 17:24:24 -0400
Yes, David Fridley KG4FZR, was a professional tower climber who owned a commercial tower company headquartered in Athens,Tn. It is believed that David died of a heart attack while descending the acce
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00253.html (9,189 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] 40-2CD (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:05:10 -0500
Lloyd, I had to replace the original screws that connect the loading coil to the tubing in each loading coil assembly (LCA) on my Cushcraft 402CD. I split the original heat shrink and trimmed it back
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00058.html (8,538 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Is there a point of diminishing returns on gain forstacking HF beams? (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 07:33:38 -0400
This might be of interest to you: http://www.yccc.org/Articles/N6BV/Stacks%20Milford%20CT%202003.pdf 73, Ted W4NZ --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00380.html (8,520 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Wrench, got it - tnx (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <W4NZ@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:40:18 -0500
Ratcheting box-end wrench. I own a set and they are VERY handy. here's an example: http://www.mytoolstore.com/sk/sk03156.html 73, Ted W4NZ Howdy -- I guess I should've done a google search first. It'
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00426.html (7,500 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <W4NZ@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 12:52:12 -0500
"...I'm not sure what it's called, but it was some sort of "inverted sloper" or "reverse ground plane" ..." See "Simple, Effective Elevated Ground-Plane Antennas" by Tom Russell, June 1994 QST, page
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-01/msg00047.html (9,628 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] upper/lower/both box (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <W4NZ@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:27:25 -0400
National Contest Journal: 2004 November/December issue,p.8, Improved Stack Switching with Invisible Stubs by N4TZ 1980 November/December issue,p.12, Upper-Lower-BIP-BOP Switch by K1GQ 1980 September/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-06/msg00206.html (9,312 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] securing loose element ends (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <W4NZ@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:30:57 -0400
Yes, this is by far the easiest and a very effective method. I find it is easier to cut the slots opposing each other (180 degrees) and at a depth just slightly larger than the width of the SS hose c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00610.html (14,586 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] Why is a reflector preferred over director for2 element designs? (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <W4NZ@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:40:08 -0400
all this and more is well explained here: http://www.cebik.com/content/a10/yagi/beam.html You may need to register (free) first. 73, Ted W4NZ --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00337.html (10,147 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Help with TH2MK3 BETA MATCH dimensions (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:45:07 -0400
You can download the TH2MK3 manual here: <http://www.hy-gain.com/support.php> 73, Ted W4NZ --Original Message-- From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bruce Jungwirth
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-07/msg00135.html (8,404 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] Takeoff angle (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 17:42:13 -0400
Jeff, <http://wwrof.org/webinar-archive/what-ive-learned-in-two-decades-of-terrain -assessment/> 73, Ted W4NZ I've been playing around with HFTA trying to figure out the best height/ configuration fo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-07/msg00274.html (8,213 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] Calculating Forces for Tilting tower (score: 1)
Author: "Ted Bryant W4NZ" <w4nz@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 21:24:30 -0400
It has been a long time since I've had to solve a Statics and Dynamics problem. But I believe there are some missing elements in the analysis. For example. with the lifting point at 10 feet from the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2019-05/msg00170.html (13,582 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu