Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:af5cc2@gmail.com: 169 ]

Total 169 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [CQ-Contest] NCJ Article: Sweepstakes Change Suggestions - slow CW (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 13:48:00 -0500
"A slow QSO is better than no QSO." ("The Art of War", Sun Tzu, ca. 544-496 BCE) Wow, I didn't know that had amateur radio and QSOs back in the 500s BC, guess I learned my new fact for the day! 73 Jo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-03/msg00248.html (11,545 bytes)

82. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW SS: Some thoughts (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 14:26:39 -0500
Yes, I was aiming my comments at contest novices, who would probably like to see their call in the results, but also might not be up to speed on log submissions and such. I ended up submitting my log
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-03/msg00264.html (10,059 bytes)

83. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL SS SSB (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 16:35:10 -0500
Remember what we learned from previous Sweepstakes and check discussions on this list. The check is just some 2 digit number you make up, so you can't read much into your data. Some numbers are easie
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-04/msg00071.html (14,320 bytes)

84. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rare American entities (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:26:20 -0500
I remember KH3 seemed to be the easiest one to work of those. I have quite a few /KH3 QSLs from the 80s and 90s. One of my more prize QSLs is from KH7AA, the first KH7 call issued for Kure. That was
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-04/msg00128.html (9,386 bytes)

85. [CQ-Contest] Contesting software question (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:33:17 -0500
73 John AF5CC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-04/msg00134.html (7,191 bytes)

86. Re: [CQ-Contest] Status of List (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:19:32 +0000
Everyone has been too busy working the great 6 meter openings over the last couple of day! 73 John AF5CC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-06/msg00131.html (7,942 bytes)

87. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Callsigns (was: WRTC Stations) (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 14:14:22 +0000
Maybe they will bring back the Y## blocks for callsigns, in a blast from the past, as those prefixes were used by the GDR (East Germany). 73 John AF5CC _______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00009.html (12,417 bytes)

88. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Stations to use old DDR call sign block (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 14:38:56 -0500
And I had given up hope of ever getting any more of the old East German Prefixes! 73 John AF5CC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00130.html (8,724 bytes)

89. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2022 WRTC Thoughts (score: 1)
Author: af5cc2 <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 21:49:07 -0500
There is plenty of salt water by Italy. 73 John AF5CC I think that has been the worst kept secret in ham radio. :) _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-07/msg00153.html (11,122 bytes)

90. [CQ-Contest] Yaesu rotor control question (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 17:16:42 -0500
I am sure many contesters are using Yaesu rotors, and some are probably controlling them with a Yaesu rotor, or even remotely using the Yaesu PCC radio control software, so hopefully someone on the l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-08/msg00065.html (6,854 bytes)

91. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 10:08:38 -0500
SSB is antiquated also, we should all be using digital voice! 73 John AF5CC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-08/msg00102.html (12,854 bytes)

92. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 18:49:48 -0500
Or a boy with his Icom 718 and a dipole, the most unfair of all. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-08/msg00124.html (11,015 bytes)

93. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 12:39:57 -0500
" B) We have contests like SS where the Unassisted categories can be more competitive than the unlimited ones." If you look at the contest results, at least the ones printed in the QST for the ARRL c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-08/msg00133.html (17,717 bytes)

94. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted (score: 1)
Author: af5cc2 <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 17:59:49 -0500
How to the assisted guys do in the NA Sprints? Sent from my U.S. CellularŽ Smartphone-- Original message --From: Radio KŘHB <kzerohb@gmail.com> Date: 8/18/2018 4:37 PM (GMT-06:00) To: John Geiger <af
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-08/msg00137.html (9,007 bytes)

95. [CQ-Contest] Best 100 watt SSB contesting radios (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 18:14:31 -0600
I have been playing around a little in the SSB Sweepstakes this weekend, and was again reminded of how CW contesting is much easier when you have a limited station. I am in the market for another rad
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00077.html (7,292 bytes)

96. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best radio for SSB (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 11:43:23 -0600
That is good to know about the rig equalization. Sounds like I would want a radio with that. I see that some of the newer Yaesus have 3 band parametric equalization, which I would guess is a plus. An
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00092.html (10,309 bytes)

97. Re: [CQ-Contest] WSJT-X and contesting (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 14:09:44 -0600
Why did the ARRL choose to allow PSK31, ASCII, AMTOR and Packet in the RTTY Roundup, but not allow other digital modes like MFSK16 and Hellschreiber? I know that CQ magazine only allows RTTY in their
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00012.html (10,416 bytes)

98. Re: [CQ-Contest] At least four more years of solar minimum? (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2018 14:17:19 -0600
That is kind of what I was thinking also. The last solar minimum was in 2007, which is 11 years ago, so we should be at the next minimum right now, and many days have occurred recently with 0 sunspot
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00100.html (11,351 bytes)

99. Re: [CQ-Contest] Robotic contest operating, why knot? (score: 1)
Author: af5cc2 <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 17:09:23 -0600
A couple of the older Soviet satellites had a CW robot you could work.  You could even get a QSL for it.  How great would it be to work nobody in space!!73 John AF5CCSent from my U.S. CellularŽ Smart
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00205.html (9,822 bytes)

100. Re: [CQ-Contest] One Week until The Stew Perry Top Band DX Challenge! (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 13:25:21 -0600
" Greetings Top Band Insomniacs" To Quote Aerosmith: "We ain't seen the daylight since we started this band!" 73 John AF5CC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00232.html (12,912 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu