Remember what we learned from previous Sweepstakes and check discussions on
this list. The check is just some 2 digit number you make up, so you can't
read much into your data. Some numbers are easier to transmit than others.
73 John AF5CC
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 8:50 AM, rjairam@gmail.com <rjairam@gmail.com> wrote:
> My general feeling is that ham radio peaked in several periods and the
> interest was retained among those who were there during the peaks. Others
> just fell off.
>
> So your survey of checks reflects that.
>
> 73
> Ria
> N2RJ
>
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 9:17 AM Joe <nss@mwt.net> wrote:
>
> > Kind of looking at the log from last november antuicipating the results
> > any day now. But something I noticed was interesting on the CK Numbers
> > we worked. And how many,, Check this out.
> >
> > Sweepstakes Checks
> > Check QSOs Pct
> > ----------------------
> > 00 9 1.6
> > 01 2 0.4
> > 02 6 1.1
> > 03 4 0.7
> > 04 3 0.5
> > 05 2 0.4
> > 06 2 0.4
> > 07 3 0.5
> > 08 4 0.7
> > 09 3 0.5
> > 10 2 0.4
> > 11 3 0.5
> > 12 4 0.7
> > 13 7 1.2
> > 14 5 0.9
> > 15 8 1.4
> > 16 9 1.6
> > 17 6 1.1
> > 18 0 0.0
> > 19 0 0.0
> > 20 0 0.0
> > 21 0 0.0
> > 22 0 0.0
> > 23 0 0.0
> > 24 1 0.2
> > 25 0 0.0
> > 26 0 0.0
> > 27 0 0.0
> > 28 0 0.0
> > 29 0 0.0
> > 30 1 0.2
> > 31 2 0.4
> > 32 1 0.2
> > 33 1 0.2
> > 34 0 0.0
> > 35 0 0.0
> > 36 0 0.0
> > 37 0 0.0
> > 38 0 0.0
> > 39 0 0.0
> > 40 1 0.2
> > 41 0 0.0
> > 42 0 0.0
> > 43 0 0.0
> > 44 0 0.0
> > 45 0 0.0
> > 46 0 0.0
> > 47 2 0.4
> > 48 3 0.5
> > 49 1 0.2
> > 50 0 0.0
> > 51 1 0.2
> > 52 6 1.1
> > 53 4 0.7
> > 54 7 1.2
> > 55 7 1.2
> > 56 6 1.1
> > 57 9 1.6
> > 58 8 1.4
> > 59 20 3.5
> > 60 16 2.8
> > 61 19 3.4
> > 62 20 3.5
> > 63 19 3.4
> > 64 12 2.1
> > 65 13 2.3
> > 66 12 2.1
> > 67 16 2.8
> > 68 12 2.1
> > 69 17 3.0
> > 70 13 2.3
> > 71 11 1.9
> > 72 10 1.8
> > 73 13 2.3
> > 74 9 1.6
> > 75 11 1.9
> > 76 24 4.2
> > 77 16 2.8
> > 78 9 1.6
> > 79 11 1.9
> > 80 4 0.7
> > 81 5 0.9
> > 82 3 0.5
> > 83 8 1.4
> > 84 4 0.7
> > 85 4 0.7
> > 86 6 1.1
> > 87 7 1.2
> > 88 2 0.4
> > 89 11 1.9
> > 90 7 1.2
> > 91 15 2.7
> > 92 7 1.2
> > 93 6 1.1
> > 94 4 0.7
> > 95 5 0.9
> > 96 8 1.4
> > 97 4 0.7
> > 98 5 0.9
> > 99 5 0.9
> >
> > Everything is in the single digits till 1958/59 What happened then? WOW!
> > and then in 1980 it fell apart again.
> >
> > what changed on those dates?
> >
> > Joe WB9SBD
> > --
> > Sig
> > The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> > Idle Tyme
> > Idle-Tyme.com
> > http://www.idle-tyme.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|