CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL SS SSB

To: Bob Poortinga <ng9m@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL SS SSB
From: "Alan M. Eshleman" <doctore@well.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2018 13:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Correct! Those were the kids who, if teenagers today, would be computer nerds.  
Check 56 for me...

73, Alan/K6SRZ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Poortinga" <ng9m@arrl.net>
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
Sent: Saturday, April 7, 2018 7:29:50 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL SS SSB

This distribution appears to me to be evidence of The Baby Boomer
generation in the US. (Persons born between 1945 and 1965.)

73 de Bob NG9M


On Sat, Apr 7, 2018, 9:27 AM Joe <nss@mwt.net> wrote:

> Kind of looking at the log from last november antuicipating the results
> any day now. But something I noticed was interesting on the CK Numbers
> we worked. And how many,, Check this out.
>
> Sweepstakes Checks
> Check  QSOs    Pct
> ----------------------
>    00     9     1.6
>    01     2     0.4
>    02     6     1.1
>    03     4     0.7
>    04     3     0.5
>    05     2     0.4
>    06     2     0.4
>    07     3     0.5
>    08     4     0.7
>    09     3     0.5
>    10     2     0.4
>    11     3     0.5
>    12     4     0.7
>    13     7     1.2
>    14     5     0.9
>    15     8     1.4
>    16     9     1.6
>    17     6     1.1
>    18     0     0.0
>    19     0     0.0
>    20     0     0.0
>    21     0     0.0
>    22     0     0.0
>    23     0     0.0
>    24     1     0.2
>    25     0     0.0
>    26     0     0.0
>    27     0     0.0
>    28     0     0.0
>    29     0     0.0
>    30     1     0.2
>    31     2     0.4
>    32     1     0.2
>    33     1     0.2
>    34     0     0.0
>    35     0     0.0
>    36     0     0.0
>    37     0     0.0
>    38     0     0.0
>    39     0     0.0
>    40     1     0.2
>    41     0     0.0
>    42     0     0.0
>    43     0     0.0
>    44     0     0.0
>    45     0     0.0
>    46     0     0.0
>    47     2     0.4
>    48     3     0.5
>    49     1     0.2
>    50     0     0.0
>    51     1     0.2
>    52     6     1.1
>    53     4     0.7
>    54     7     1.2
>    55     7     1.2
>    56     6     1.1
>    57     9     1.6
>    58     8     1.4
>    59    20     3.5
>    60    16     2.8
>    61    19     3.4
>    62    20     3.5
>    63    19     3.4
>    64    12     2.1
>    65    13     2.3
>    66    12     2.1
>    67    16     2.8
>    68    12     2.1
>    69    17     3.0
>    70    13     2.3
>    71    11     1.9
>    72    10     1.8
>    73    13     2.3
>    74     9     1.6
>    75    11     1.9
>    76    24     4.2
>    77    16     2.8
>    78     9     1.6
>    79    11     1.9
>    80     4     0.7
>    81     5     0.9
>    82     3     0.5
>    83     8     1.4
>    84     4     0.7
>    85     4     0.7
>    86     6     1.1
>    87     7     1.2
>    88     2     0.4
>    89    11     1.9
>    90     7     1.2
>    91    15     2.7
>    92     7     1.2
>    93     6     1.1
>    94     4     0.7
>    95     5     0.9
>    96     8     1.4
>    97     4     0.7
>    98     5     0.9
>    99     5     0.9
>
> Everything is in the single digits till 1958/59 What happened then? WOW!
> and then in 1980 it fell apart again.
>
> what changed on those dates?
>
> Joe WB9SBD
> --
> Sig
> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> Idle Tyme
> Idle-Tyme.com
> http://www.idle-tyme.com
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>