Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:atrampler@att.net: 61 ]

Total 61 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Phillystran or Fiberglass (score: 1)
Author: <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 19:51:54 -0500
Hi All, I'm putting up a small (60') guyed tower (Glen Martin 18") and would prefer to guy with fiberglass (due to cost) or phillystran if need be. The top guy, total length (without grips, EHS end,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00692.html (7,234 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Fiberglass Rod Part Deux (score: 1)
Author: "Arthur Trampler" <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:24:14 -0500
I'm interested to see if there are a few of us who would want to purchase new fiberglass rod together to meet the minimum order. One manufacturer requires 5,000 feet; another I found, 2,000 feet. Per
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00741.html (7,283 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] HAZER guying (score: 1)
Author: "Arthur Trampler" <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:30:58 -0500
Marc, First, I am assuming your tower is tall enough to require two (or more) sets of guys. I have a free (to me) Glen Martin, 50' tower, 18" on a side that I will be putting up within the next six m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00323.html (12,525 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] advice sought (score: 1)
Author: <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:24:37 -0500
How long would you want to expect to be in a home to justify the expense of a tower install versus other antennas? I have a small backyard (70' x 100' roughly) with three trees in/around it that are
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00475.html (9,226 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] advice sought (score: 1)
Author: <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:29:33 -0500
Thanks, all. One piece of this just got easier. My dad sent an email tonight that he has an idea to do this, perhaps in a more simple way than I had envisioned, bringing at least his xcvr upstairs. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00482.html (8,772 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] advice sought (score: 1)
Author: <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:35:58 -0500
Thanks all for the advice. The plan has become simplified. I'm selling the AL-1500 and two extra medical pull tubes to raise cash for a tower--or I'll trade for the tower (which is why this is not en
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00527.html (8,538 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower accident, (score: 1)
Author: "Arthur Trampler" <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:03:23 -0500
Check the stats...you will find that professional tower climbing has the highest risk of occupational fatality of all industries, higher than logging, or even those folks in the Bering Sea popularize
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00672.html (9,422 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] safe curing time (score: 1)
Author: <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 05:47:08 -0500
Once upon a time Steve mentioned that in his line he uses 5,000 PSI concrete because it even before fully cured, it is strong enough to use much more quickly and he wants to get in/out to do a job. T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00794.html (8,815 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Safe Curing Time (score: 1)
Author: <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 06:40:24 -0500
OK...got enough responses...I've been patients for months and years, won't blow it now... _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mai
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00796.html (7,745 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] water in coax (score: 1)
Author: <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:28:03 -0600
OK...I did it...I kept saying, "I'll get some coax seal on that joint when..." Well, the ice storm hit before "when" hit. Does Coax dry? If not, is there a good way to figure out how deep the water h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00124.html (6,714 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] water in coax (score: 1)
Author: <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:43:14 -0600
Maybe the gods spared me, and maybe it was just more ice on the vertical. SWR back to normal. The reason I suspected water in the coax was that the roughly 5:1 SWR did not vary with frequency, and a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00188.html (10,418 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Q on guyed rotating towers (score: 1)
Author: "Arthur Trampler" <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:24:39 -0600
OK--I am not in the market for one of these, so this is for learning, only. With a rotating guyed tower, is there some sort of locking mechanism between the bearings and tower, at least in a given "p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00394.html (7,347 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Q on guyed rotating towers (score: 1)
Author: <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:37:19 -0600
Mike, I think what you are saying is the stength of the tower itself is not changed, it is simply that whatever downforce is generated from torsional load on a guyed tower is not present, and that su
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00402.html (10,058 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] Ebay: Servicing a wench (score: 1)
Author: "Arthur Trampler" <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 13:04:56 -0500
Anyone sure how to service a wench looks OK? http://cgi.ebay.com/TRI-EX-CRANK-UP-ANTENNA-TOWER-54_W0QQitemZ250248303631QQihZ015QQcategoryZ4672QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem ___________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00299.html (7,607 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] 25G/House bracket (score: 1)
Author: "Art Trampler" <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:05:53 -0500
Hi All, A friend and I are helping a YL HF operator reactivate after several years QRT. Now a gentleman never shares a woman's age, but let's just say she could have voted for Truman, and maybe for F
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00039.html (8,059 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] bracketed 25G (score: 1)
Author: "Art Trampler" <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 15:44:27 -0500
Hi All, Thanks for the replies...I grabbed the Rohn catalog as recommended and have come to see the error of my good intentions! 73, KØRO _______________________________________________ _____________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-09/msg00046.html (6,620 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] 43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun type, (score: 1)
Author: "Art Trampler" <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:29:57 -0600
OK, so what happens if we modify the N3OX approach. I have a Hy-Gain AV640 as my only antenna, and have it mounted on a 20', foldover "tower." See, there's a tower to this. SEriously, 4" diameter up
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00499.html (10,914 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Was "43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun Type" (score: 1)
Author: <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:01:35 -0600
At that point a rigid vertical dipole, perhaps 80' high, also might make a lot of sense to build. There's a Chinese unit rated at 400w continuous, but that's as much as I've seen in a SMALL weatheriz
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00590.html (10,260 bytes)

19. [TowerTalk] fiberglass masts (score: 1)
Author: "Art Trampler" <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 10:08:14 -0600
This is an antenna support question...so hopefully it is close enough to a tower to allow a little discussion! I have been thinking about constructing an antenna support of military surplus 48" fiber
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00323.html (8,208 bytes)

20. [TowerTalk] thanks all! (score: 1)
Author: "Art Trampler" <atrampler@att.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:53:52 -0600
Got the message...onto Plan B! _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00329.html (6,493 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu