Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:barry.n1eu@gmail.com: 1936 ]

Total 1936 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec] RX EQ and TX EQ in 2055 (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:10:42 +0000
As far as I can tell, RX EQ is working fine in 2.055 - the one thing I do notice is that the rx audio response curves are a bit tilted at 0dB EQ now. I run RX EQ at +6dB and SUBEQ at -10dB just to fl
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00085.html (7,612 bytes)

122. Re: [TenTec] Observatons (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:08:51 -0500
Just wanted to comment that I find it interesting, in retrospect, to look back at the mass hysteria that erupted when the Orion II was first announced. Folks were convinced that only the O2 would rec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00336.html (7,839 bytes)

123. Re: [TenTec] V1.373b3 anomaly? (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 23:47:52 +0000
Everyone shouyld ALWAYS do a master reset after flashing the firmware. ALWAYS. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00370.html (7,012 bytes)

124. Re: [TenTec] Version 1.373b3 Now Available (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 09:14:00 -0500
I'm similarly amazed by technology. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00396.html (8,162 bytes)

125. Re: [TenTec] 253 Tuner --- (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 07:08:04 -0500
If Harry didn't respond affirmatively to a specific offer to buy, then I would cut him some slack. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00423.html (10,209 bytes)

126. Re: [TenTec] 253 Tuner --- (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 08:58:55 -0500
Could somebody please spell out exactly what we're talking about here? Is it something beyond posting a for sale message, receiving a few buy offers, and then increasing the price? Is that all it was
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00429.html (8,267 bytes)

127. Re: [TenTec] Orion I V2.055 Spurious Response (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 07:13:45 -0500
The subreceiver is prone toward spurs and overload - virtually any signal s9+20 will generate a spur displaced by a few khz. I regularly hear these on 160M cw. The subreceiver is also very noisy duri
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00453.html (7,696 bytes)

128. Re: [TenTec] 100 Hz DSP CW filter response with Orion I V2.056 (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:03:09 +0000
When I measure the audio response, I find that the width at -6dB is 107hz and at -60dB it's 298hz Spectrum taken shown at http://n1eu.com/100hz_v2056.gif 73, Barry N1EU ______________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00535.html (10,282 bytes)

129. [TenTec] v2.056 TX audio quality (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:25:44 +0000
I've been doing some tx audio quality comparison between v1.373b5 and v2.056. I've been making recordings through both the Orion monitor and on a 2nd receiver with wide bandwidth. The v2 audio just i
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00537.html (7,467 bytes)

130. Re: [TenTec] 100 Hz DSP CW filter response with Orion I V2.056 (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 16:27:47 +0000
Sinisa, do you think the v2 i.f. response is similar to the audio response of v1.373? In other words, in v2 they added the audio filter as post-processing to the v1 filter? 73, Barry N1EU ___________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00538.html (9,055 bytes)

131. Re: [TenTec] Effect of roofing filter selection on Orion II NB (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:47:26 -0500
Right, and to me it doesn't so I don't use it. Whatever floats your boat. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contest
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00692.html (8,367 bytes)

132. Re: [TenTec] Roof filters (N4PY and KC9CDT) (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:03:29 -0500
I'm pretty sure this has been corrected in the latest Orion I v2 firmware. The overall freq response of the main and sub rx has changed in v2 vs v1. Generally speaking, you should adjust your RX EQ a
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00731.html (8,458 bytes)

133. Re: [TenTec] Roof filters (N4PY and KC9CDT) (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:38:12 -0500
Grant, a short while back towards the end of the v2 beta testing on the OI, that problem was discovered and addressed. I believe it's fixed in v2.056Orion I. I know nothing of the OII status. 73, Bar
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00735.html (9,644 bytes)

134. Re: [TenTec] Roof filters (N4PY and KC9CDT) (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:41:40 -0500
Yes, the v1 audio response at 0dB was much flatter than v2. There's also a rolloff at low freq (<150hz) in v2 such that it can't be restored with the EQ control to have the same low end extension as
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00736.html (8,292 bytes)

135. Re: [TenTec] OII Audio testing/optimization (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 03:09:51 +0000
Ron, I can't understand what you're saying here??? 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01075.html (7,774 bytes)

136. Re: [TenTec] OII Audio testing/optimization (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 12:05:51 +0000
I've done a lot of tx audio measurements (e.g. freq response of monitored audio) with spoken voice at normal ALC levels (with and without SP) on my Orion v1 and v2 and have never seen this phenomenon
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01088.html (8,183 bytes)

137. Re: [TenTec] Orion Aux Audio output (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 01:20:54 +0000
On my v2.056 Orion, the aux I/O "line" outputs definitely vary (almost linearly) with the main/sub af controls. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenT
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01227.html (10,975 bytes)

138. Re: [TenTec] Orion Aux Audio output (explained) (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:06:26 +0000
Not so fast. I'm running v2.056 and my aux I/O audio lines aren't always fixed level output. I'm using the K5SF dongle and observing the main (left) and sub (right) audio levels. If I have both AF le
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01241.html (9,676 bytes)

139. Re: [TenTec] The Bug (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 08:32:41 -0400
Not sure about the O2, but bad tx audio definitely can be an issue with the v2.056 O1. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00160.html (7,490 bytes)

140. Re: [TenTec] The Bug (score: 1)
Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 12:50:18 -0400
I can confirm the loss of low end response in the v2.056 O1 - I consistently have observed it in both the tx audio and the main rx audio. I don't see it in the subrx audio response. This is after equ
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-04/msg00179.html (8,535 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu