Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:bhrbek@jagwireless.com: 236 ]

Total 236 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [Karlnet] Real signal strength readings on PRISM 2.5 radios (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 11:45:25 -0500
proper upgraded
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-05/msg00133.html (9,455 bytes)

62. Re: [Karlnet] Real signal strength readings on PRISM 2.5 radios (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 13:38:53 -0500
Again....YUP, same here. I think the noise values appear every now and then but they are normally reported at -95. I really doubt that is the noise level. I have my cards flashed with 1.56 or somethi
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-05/msg00136.html (11,807 bytes)

63. Re: [Karlnet] Real signal strength readings on PRISM 2.5 radios (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 10:10:00 -0500
especially if you are shooting through a tree or some obstruction. downloaded situation:
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-05/msg00138.html (12,501 bytes)

64. Re: [Karlnet] Karlbridge radio lockups / Licensing Question (begentle!) (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 19:53:54 -0500
How is your SNR when you do a link test? Seems like anything under 20+ and you'll certainly see these issues. -bob -- Original Message -- From: <bradlists@mnns.com> To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com> Sent:
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-05/msg00143.html (11,181 bytes)

65. Re: [Karlnet] Ethernet Port failures (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 22:43:10 -0500
protectnet? prevented
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-05/msg00161.html (9,482 bytes)

66. Re: [Karlnet] wet 11 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 07:25:53 -0500
Cost? that not their a
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-05/msg00166.html (16,095 bytes)

67. Re: KARLNET --- RE: [Karlnet] wet 11 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 09:40:41 -0500
at least it's entertaining. The characters keep changing though.....Now Charles is working on a leading role in the drama.
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-05/msg00169.html (18,249 bytes)

68. Re: [Karlnet] RE: customer vpn's behind wireless cpe (Charles ChiaShengWu) (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 00:01:30 -0600
bridging and NAT? I thought it was one or the other but not both! -bob -- Original Message -- From: "Zac Baala" <zack@goldenit.com.au> To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 11:1
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00011.html (16,649 bytes)

69. Re: [Karlnet] Thanks to Zcomax (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 17:39:49 -0500
I've used the RG and RF-linx amp together with a 15V 1.1a ps. I tried an 18v 1.5a for about 2 weeks, it worked fine until one day...it just stopped working. I power-cycled the setup...but it wouldn't
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00032.html (22,532 bytes)

70. Re: [Karlnet] Turbocell Signal (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:50:59 -0500
I've seen on links that have weak signals or have good signals but are greater than 5 miles. If I go to the IP of the RG, it works....just not from the AP.
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00042.html (9,330 bytes)

71. Re: [Karlnet] Turbocell Signal (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 14:57:50 -0500
That describes my scenario well. 42 customers on one interface. have more than 40 customers connecting on a single wireless interface. I hardly ever see this happen when there are less than 20 custom
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00044.html (10,441 bytes)

72. Re: [Karlnet] limiting bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 17:04:19 -0500
I've played with the bandwidth limiting in both 3.88 and 4.x. It doesn't seem to work very well. If it set a user to 256K, they were getting like 80K. If I set them to 290K, they got about 220K. If I
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00053.html (15,476 bytes)

73. Re: [Karlnet] limiting bandwidth (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 19:17:17 -0500
You know...to a large extent, it just doesn't seem to matter. Even with 40+ clients on a single AP, (all 256k/256K) I just don't have problems. Latency stays low on the local network. The Mikrotik ro
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00057.html (19,801 bytes)

74. Re: [Karlnet] Turbocell Signal (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 07:17:52 -0500
I've not tried a ping flood....I would imagine that most networks would experience packet loss during ping floods. I can do 64byte pings to these guys for hours without loosing a packet. (or maybe 1
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00059.html (13,053 bytes)

75. Re: [Karlnet] Turbocell Signal (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 15:03:23 -0500
I just did a 500 count ping flood to each host on this network and none dropped a single packet.
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00065.html (16,092 bytes)

76. Re: [Karlnet] Turbocell Signal (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 08:20:36 -0500
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00073.html (19,652 bytes)

77. Re: [Karlnet] COR & ROR Compatibility?? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 23:42:51 -0500
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00123.html (7,765 bytes)

78. [Karlnet] RG-1000's that CONSTANTLY lockup (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:12:00 -0500
Alright, I'm about ready to replace all the stupid RG-1000's I have with WET11's. This is getting rediculous. Everytime a wind storm rolls through, many of my customers have to power cycle their radi
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00129.html (8,021 bytes)

79. [Karlnet] test (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:53:43 -0500
ping
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00130.html (6,961 bytes)

80. Re: [Karlnet] RG-1000's that CONSTANTLY lockup (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 01:20:30 -0500
That's the thing... the SNR varies from 16dbm to 40dbm It just doesn't seem to matter. It does seem like the lower the SNR (or signal) the more often it happens. Although...I have two customers that
/archives//html/Karlnet/2003-04/msg00133.html (10,273 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu