Mail Archive Search: <+from:chestert@pressroom.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:chestert@pressroom.com: 73 ]

Total 73 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Larry/VA3LK (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 12:19:32 -0400; It's certainly unfortunate that you guys get your feelings so hurt when ever someone tell's the truth about TenTec gear! Product loyalty is one thing, but ignorance is another. Larry is a long-time e; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-07/msg00191.html (7,980 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Larry/VA3LK (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 19:33:49 -0400; Not that rag chewing has anything to do with some of the dribble you read on email reflectors, I agree with you, but it is a heck of a lot more fun using the rigs you buy rather than defending them.; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-07/msg00206.html (8,909 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Pegasus, a sad day...... (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 19:38:03 -0400; I am an ex-TenTec user and I say 'ex' because I got 8 years of great service out of my Omni 6 and my Titan amplifier and was/am very happy with it. However it would never run CW fast enough for me, b; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-07/msg00235.html (11,266 bytes)
4. Fw: [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 23:15:27 -0400; was DX Titan it it would I one over speeds or how amateur of of but a matter justify -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests:; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00061.html (14,443 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Re: Ten Tec antenna tuners (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2000 22:53:57 -0400; No wonder we never heard you! Tom/W4BQF -- Original Message -- From: "Al Scanandoah" <wa2vez@rochester.rr.com> To: "David McClafferty" <at060@chebucto.ns.ca> Cc: "Steve Ellington" <N4LQ@iglou.com>; "; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-04/msg00034.html (9,096 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Titan Problem (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 19:36:56 -0400; Hi Sid..I think EVERYONE who has a Titan has had that problem. In the 8 yrs I've had mine, I've probably replaced the relay at least six or seven times; but then I run it at 70+wpm full QSK also. The; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-04/msg00050.html (8,690 bytes)
7. [TenTec] SWR Bridge Null Adjustment (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 21:51:08 -0500; I have a Titan amplifier that has numerous hundreds of operating hours on it. I am beginning to see that the reflected power is reading high, even when loaded into a good 50 ohm load. I say 'good 50; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-03/msg00415.html (7,623 bytes)
8. [TenTec] OMNI VI TROUBLE (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Sun, 01 Nov 1998 21:13:31 -0500; --==_28964262==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" John...I think it's just the gremelins after us? Saturday, I had the very same thing happen to me. I had some QSO's early in the morn; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00008.html (13,065 bytes)
9. [TenTec] OMNI VI birdies and hash nearly solved (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1998 07:43:11 -0500; Hi Clark....I wouldn't make the assumption that because you got the upgrade that you also got a complete realignment of the rig. I can give you (but I know youve arleady read it!) my on the air compa; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00090.html (7,873 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Titan info (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1998 19:53:52 -0500; --==_1887153==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi Bob and congrats on getting your hands on a darned good amp. I've had mine for seven years and other than having to replace vacuum; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00131.html (13,150 bytes)
11. [TenTec] You "no clickers" (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 20:13:50 -0500; --==_43280833==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hmmm...guess I don't understand your question: "is a non-player anyway?" ? I run my seven year old Omni 6 up to it's max speed of 68; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00278.html (12,573 bytes)
12. [TenTec] You "no clickers" (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 20:08:48 -0500; --==_43280793==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Nope, but I operate cw over 30wpm with the QSK set to slow and adjust the QSK speed with the DLY button setting. Have never heard any; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00279.html (10,696 bytes)
13. [TenTec] INRAD or TT Filters for Paragon I? (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 12:49:01 -0400; Eric, The differences may be noticed depending on how you use your rig. All of the INRAD filters are 8-pole crystal lattice filters (you really don't want the Collins mechanical filters). They do hav; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-10/msg00120.html (9,074 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Front End Protection (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 09:40:27 -0400; I sure agree with Steve! Now that everyone has successfully proved they spend more time sending reflector email than they do operating on the ham bands, and they can copy equations from books to post; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-10/msg00143.html (8,993 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Filters For Sale (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 19:37:30 -0400; --==_1984335==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Please excuse me for using the reflector for placing sale items on the reflector, but it's all good TenTec items. Ten Tec Filters For; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-10/msg00153.html (10,231 bytes)
16. [TenTec] OMNI VI with INRAD filters (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 04:07:24 -0400; --==_1642432==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I too, have purchased the INRAD filters and installed them in my Omni 6+. And like Clark, my ears sure can detect a difference, even t; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-10/msg00177.html (11,107 bytes)
17. [TenTec] 250 Hz Filter Comments (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1998 11:11:00 -0400; At 08:38 AM 9/1/98 -0500, you wrote: Rick....Fortunately the front end of the Omni 6 is so solid that you normally do not need the 250Hz filter during contesting. I set both IF filters to 500Hz durin; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00008.html (8,610 bytes)
18. [TenTec] Corsair II sidetone (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1998 13:32:33 -0400; No Bob. A Corsair UJT monitor generator puts out a square wave. A square wave sounds like a 'buzz saw'! If you can't hear it, someone has either modified your Corsair before you got it, or you can't; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00031.html (7,673 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Need HF Rig Recommendation (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Sat, 05 Sep 1998 06:24:17 -0400; --==_834743==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi Rich...I would suggest hanging on a little longer and getting a Corsair 2 as it has a few more refinements than the Corsair 1. While; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00062.html (12,680 bytes)
20. [TenTec] Contesting (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Sat, 05 Sep 1998 16:07:38 -0400; --==_18403960==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" contesters.." (Un)fortunately that is quite true. When I operated the 80m position at W3LPL's contest station I, of course, took my O; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-09/msg00072.html (10,742 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]