Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:daleputnam@hotmail.com: 351 ]

Total 351 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest CQ format? (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:55:22 -0600
See below for comments please.--... ...-- Dale - WC7S in Wy There are many times when a "hot-shot" op doesn't get to log this station, because he/she didn't respond to a call in an appropriate manner
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00367.html (10,887 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Fat Lady Sings at 2359Z (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:59:43 -0600
Very well thought out and spot on, Bill. It is an interesting set of opinions, and that is rather mild understatement, I think. --... ...-- Dale - WC7S in Wy Make note to self, update list to work th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00409.html (8,459 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW zero pointers etc (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 21:12:29 -0600
All the discussion about all the hard, tenuous, extremly unwanted extraneous and otherwise unappreciated contacts, during contests... make a fellow figure that contests are not for making contacts. T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00149.html (8,155 bytes)

64. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 meter contest windows (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:40:26 -0600
And, dear Tom, as you have correctly identified and described it... is pretty much why this station doesn't work 160 nearly as intently as in the past. I'd guess there are a lot of stations that want
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00197.html (7,464 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] Please DO SOMETHING! (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:52:17 -0600
Does the Ferrarri vs Ford have an advantage on a road course? Does the Jaguar vw Chev have a better advantage on a drag strip?Does the Dodge or Hummer have the advantage on in the Baja? To spell it o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00277.html (8,441 bytes)

66. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesters and LOTW (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 19:07:14 -0600
And along the same lines, after making a couple thousand Qs with JA, the cards flooded in, with very nearly 3 thousand total. Funny how that all works.... Multiple cards before I ever got the first o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00117.html (9,209 bytes)

67. Re: [CQ-Contest] A3S or TH3JR or....a QUAD! (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 07:37:13 -0600
Now you're talking... the best 20-10 mtr antenna had here has been a 2 el. Hy-gain 244 quad, have been looking for another for a long time... since the tower came down after a guy line failure, in ne
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00248.html (7,802 bytes)

68. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 Receiving Antennas (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:58:51 -0600
I've had good luck with a simple closed loop, large, 20 - 50 feet up. Large = 300 foot on a side... your size may vary, although as long as it is about a wavelength in circumference, there should be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00297.html (7,488 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 Receiving Antennas (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:02:13 -0600
One of the things that could hurt the vertical effort, may be the local noise level. One may want to have a back up plan.. that could be as simple as simply running a long piece of coax out.... I kno
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00300.html (8,932 bytes)

70. Re: [CQ-Contest] Low band antenna question (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:44:25 -0600
I've had mighty good luck with a 40 foot high NORD with an OMEGA match, and 32 radials, some were actually a 1/4 wave long.I'm currently building a new vertical that, should.... we all hope the best
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00120.html (8,387 bytes)

71. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R in the sprint's (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:58:35 -0600
But what you are referring to Randy, costs them more than what they imagine, by missing one caller, it very well could be the only mult that can/does/will hear them - and now because he didn't get an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00125.html (9,105 bytes)

72. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R in the CW Sprint (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:45:56 -0600
Tree, You problably all already there, if I read in between the lines in your post, is what I've felt for quite a while: put more of the thinking, planning and stratagy back into the efforts, rather
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00144.html (8,698 bytes)

73. Re: [CQ-Contest] What to do? (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:38:00 -0600
And the 7 lander living less than 40 mile from 0 land, takes another wedgie. Wedged betwext and between. Without a good example for any? What is a feller to do? Especially when a 2nd harmonic asks th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00238.html (8,218 bytes)

74. Re: [CQ-Contest] CWSS and daylight savings time (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:07:51 -0600
Man, and that is the hour that I am planning on taking a nap. Otherwise it doesn't seem like a big deal.--... ...--Dale - WC7S in Wy> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:03:09 -0500> From: aa5jg@lcisp.com> To:
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00297.html (9,229 bytes)

75. Re: [CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 12:43:02 -0600
I kinda figure there needs to be a whole lotta improvement in rx... for rtty and others too. Seems there isn't much listeining before cq... for either TQP or RTTy. Just try working the TQP with QRP a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00002.html (7,968 bytes)

76. Re: [CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:39:22 -0600
You're right Steve, andIt seems to me that we have a very high level challange here. Given the afore mentioned and such said that I wouldn't re-describe it here. However, it also seems to me that the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00056.html (10,115 bytes)

77. Re: [CQ-Contest] NIL = Not In Log (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 21:08:48 -0700
I find it even more ludicruous, when I get a "QSO B4" message from a fellow running in the 1200 or more Q range, and I have less than 100. I could do a dupe check faster on paper than he can with a p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00368.html (9,179 bytes)

78. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:32:39 -0700
Seems to me that this discussion, is very tightly linked to the Qso B4 chat. hmmm? And the other side of it, is simple, when the other station, qrp or not, attempts another Q, it may be a wiser decis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00443.html (10,060 bytes)

79. Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:02:08 -0700
I can seeYuri's reason, if everyone used it why not allow it without notice... The real problem is very very simple.... not all of us use it. simple as that. And... before you jump to the conclusion
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00252.html (9,590 bytes)

80. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 05:39:24 -0700
Was hoping to stay clear of this... number of reasons.. First and obvious to most, not a huge player. I just like to be competitive. And that turns out to be very much with myself. There isn't a huge
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00360.html (9,811 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu