Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dave@nk7z.net: 912 ]

Total 912 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [RFI] Shielded vs unshielded loops - difference (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:48:26 -0700
Tom, Why #43, would not #31 be better? If I understand what you are doing, you are removing Common Mode to help the pattern be sharper, is that correct? -- Support better RFI practices, please sign t
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00273.html (9,902 bytes)

122. Re: [RFI] Shielded vs unshielded loops - difference (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 22:50:28 -0700
Darn! I was looking for a shortcut! Thanks for your help here... -- Support better RFI practices, please sign this petition: at Whitehouse.gov http://wh.gov/lpz5Y ____________________________________
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00274.html (8,648 bytes)

123. Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 134, Issue 39 (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 11:52:27 -0700
Tom, Thank you for sharing your process. It helps... I am working with an older gentlemen, and will offer the option of contacting the landlord as a way of second contact. He was worried about retrib
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00285.html (9,386 bytes)

124. Re: [RFI] Grow-light.. (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:38:45 -0700
Hi Mike, It is not like that... Lets say you tag a grow operation 1 mile from you, and you don't know it is a grow operation, but you suspect it is. It and you live in a decent part of town... You di
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00292.html (11,355 bytes)

125. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:46:14 -0700
I really like your idea of making the maker replace the equipment at their cost! That places the problem and cost with the creator of the issue int eh first place! Great idea! Consider this as an opt
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00293.html (11,425 bytes)

126. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:53:33 -0700
Mike, Respectfully no one is trying to flush out an entire process down to a budget level here-- but you, and then only to shoot down an idea... I think that the spot check idea is a fine idea... I a
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00295.html (12,536 bytes)

127. Re: [RFI] Grow-lights -->Here<-- (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 06:11:02 -0700
Hi Dave, THANK YOU for the idea of including the track data and maps in our contact letters!!! I will start doing that. -- Support better RFI practices, please sign this petition: at Whitehouse.gov h
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00300.html (13,383 bytes)

128. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 06:16:18 -0700
Dale, I see after the ARRL filed the report to the FCC, that Sears and the Vendor in CA removed the product from the web sites in very short order! I have not checked to see if they have put them bac
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00301.html (15,418 bytes)

129. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 19:56:38 -0700
Hi Ed (K0IL), Leaving out any references to the "current administration", (and thus avoiding the trap of a political argument ensuing), the sniff test for the FCC's activity would be to look at the a
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00010.html (17,092 bytes)

130. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC.. (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 22:13:20 -0700
Hi Ward, Nicely put! Interestingly though that does not jive with what is happening... We are seeing enforcement take place, which confuses me after reading your take on the 2012 meeting with involve
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00015.html (10,009 bytes)

131. [RFI] ARRL to FCC II (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 22:17:31 -0700
Someone responded to me privately, with a link to the ARRL web site, covering exactly the subject of visibility of enforcement. I have no idea who at the ARRL caused this: http://www.arrl.org/news/ar
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00016.html (7,101 bytes)

132. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC.. (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 06:47:24 -0700
HI, Thanks for the help in understanding this one! -- Support better RFI practices, please sign this petition: at Whitehouse.gov http://wh.gov/lpz5Y _______________________________________________ RF
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00023.html (13,099 bytes)

133. Re: [RFI] Link-coupled loop - more. (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 19:20:19 -0700
I use this one: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Portable-Military-Army-Geology-Compass-Outdoor-Hiking-With-Light-Multifunctional-/350864477173?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item51b1270bf5 -- Support better RFI
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00038.html (10,329 bytes)

134. Re: [RFI] Listen to a Sample of what Plasma TV RFI Sounds Like (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 07:10:34 -0700
It sounds like the RX was not tuned to me... -- Support better RFI practices, please sign this petition: at Whitehouse.gov http://wh.gov/lpz5Y _______________________________________________ RFI mail
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00055.html (10,009 bytes)

135. Re: [RFI] Update for RFI/Grow Light Problem (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 17:46:38 -0700
I had the exact same result with the FCC... I had a major issue, the person was being resistive to any changes, he got a letter, and boom, the problem stopped... I can only thank the FCC for this! I
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00070.html (9,678 bytes)

136. Re: [RFI] Fwd: Re: broadcasting interference (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:07:47 -0700
If you have a tower, listen to the BC station on 80 Meters, and gently shake a guy wire... What are the results? -- Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups and reviews see: www.nk7z.net f
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00107.html (13,261 bytes)

137. Re: [RFI] No RFI/EMI Filtering on triac ... (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:09:04 -0700
It is even stated as being RFI noisy... I wonder if it is Part 15 compliant? -- Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups and reviews see: www.nk7z.net for MixW support see; http://groups.y
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00108.html (7,470 bytes)

138. [RFI] Can you say 'RFI'? Can you say BIG 'Fine'? (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:35:50 -0700
Hi all, Mr. Rogers can now say both... Just ran across this, looks like the FCC is becoming much more involved RFI take-down activities than in the past. I am very glad to hear this... Let your ARRL
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00178.html (8,577 bytes)

139. Re: [RFI] Can you say 'RFI'? Can you say BIG 'Fine'? (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:32:02 -0700
Gordon, I'm happy he is ignoring them, it will only result in larger and larger fines... I am sure he has a home, or car, all can be converted to cash when the time comes... I have ZERO problems with
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00180.html (9,581 bytes)

140. Re: [RFI] Can you say 'RFI'? Can you say BIG 'Fine'? (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 23:07:16 -0700
Depends on how long you plan on living... :) Given we are going to take a negative view of this, finding nothing positive at all in the fact the FCC actually did something, and imply nothing else wil
/archives//html/RFI/2014-04/msg00190.html (9,964 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu