Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dbmcalpine@earthlink.net: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] N6ZZ SK (score: 1)
Author: Dennis McAlpine <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:05:16 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
I met Phil, N6ZZ, many years ago while visiting at N6AA's QTH in CA. We worked many times in contests after that and there was always a quick exchange of "Hellos" before we rushed back to the effort
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00539.html (8,182 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Site Contesting Rules (score: 1)
Author: Dennis McAlpine <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:40:57 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
The question of remote contesting or, to go a step further, distributed contesting,is becoming much more of a possibility as new equipment is being offered with that capability, e.g. the TS480, the O
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00211.html (13,788 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: Dennis McAlpine <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 10:10:15 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Since remote stations are not competitive with SO2R big contester stations, than let's do what we do so often - make another category just for remotely operated stations. We cud call it "SO1R", i.e "
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00579.html (16,705 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Bananas (score: 1)
Author: Dennis McAlpine <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:31:35 -0400 (EDT)
Jim, Maybe you shud be happy that u bought the bananas. The rats were already in the house and were not going away so they were just looking for some grub. If there had not been a banana around, who
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00232.html (11,270 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R in the sprint's (score: 1)
Author: Dennis McAlpine <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:12:45 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Good point, Randy. I heard (and called) a number of guys calling CQ with no response other than a repeat CQ. I even heard loud stations call them with no response. Obviously, they were on the other r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00118.html (11,553 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R In the Sprints (score: 1)
Author: Dennis McAlpine <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:20:19 -0400 (EDT)
I agree that when done right, SO2R is vy useful and, in the hands of a skilled practitioner, (which I am not) is a joy to behold. My objection is to those who do not use it correctly and just tie up
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00135.html (9,043 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Dennis McAlpine <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:38:34 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Agreed. The RTTY signals just about wiped out 40 much of the time for TX stns, particularly the weaker mobiles. It was about the same as trying to dodge the Shortwave Broadcast stations up on the SSB
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00006.html (9,038 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Paddle Opinions? (score: 1)
Author: Dennis McAlpine <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:31:25 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
I, too, have been using a Brown Bros paddle for many years and it has been a joy to use. But it is suffering from too many Field Days, CQ WWs, etc. and is now in need of replacement. At a recent FOC
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00245.html (10,703 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] A Contester's Dilemma,or when is it necessary to take the fall for someone else? (score: 1)
Author: Dennis McAlpine <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:31:34 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Since moving to SC I have noticed that it is generally considered a pretty rare multiplier where states or sections are used as mults, e.g. SS, ARRL DX, etc. That then raises the dilemma of when to s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00421.html (9,457 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] How To Deal with Cheaters.... (score: 1)
Author: Dennis McAlpine <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:26:03 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Bravo, Jeff. My complaint is not about your actions, which I agree with, but with trying to figure out what would constitute "hard" evidence. I would think that correlating the times and frequencies
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00228.html (13,457 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] 10 Questions (score: 1)
Author: Dennis McAlpine <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:19:37 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
--Original Message-- You better find out before you put a packet of sun in your iced tea. Sun spots work in 28 day cycles, I'm told. On the other hand, packet spots never die; they are always out the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00397.html (9,548 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL cards (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis McAlpine" <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:52:28 -0500
For submissions to ARRL DXCC, I put a post-it note on the QSL stating "Use only 80m QSO only" or "Use 7 MHz QSO only" and I have not been charged for the other QSOs on the same QSL. Of course, using
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00223.html (12,520 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis McAlpine" <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:44:06 -0400
If one reads the definition from the CQ WW rules that you so kindly provided, I see nothing that disqualifies a remotely operated station. Just because one has a control wire that is outside the 500
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00413.html (13,368 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] State QSO parties and CW (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis McAlpine" <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:55:18 -0400
I recently completed a fairly extensive analysis of the rules and results for state QSO Parties and was interested to see that, overall, about half of the top score QSOs were on cw and half on SSB. B
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00558.html (10,961 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] FW: Why have different classes at all? (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis McAlpine" <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:40:52 -0400
A quick look at the results for any major contest will show that the highest scores are from the unassisted ops and the assisted ops are generally lagging. True, the assisted ops usually have more mu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00367.html (9,968 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] VE4 and ND at the same time (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis McAlpine" <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:41:16 -0500
Does this mean that every time you switch calls from a US call to a VE4 call you need to go through Customs? I was not aware that the software ignored the portion of the call after a "/". How do you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00236.html (9,864 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ban all contest spotting? (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis McAlpine" <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:40:02 -0500
But, what if one is an S&Per and changes frequency a lot? Then an update every 30 min is not enough. If you are looking for that rare SC mult in SS and you see me spotted 28 minutes ago, the chances
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00029.html (13,486 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] MMSN - can anyone explain? (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis McAlpine" <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 16:16:23 -0500
At the risk of sounding a negative note, I would think that this discussion on this reflector is using up a lot of spectrum uselessly. I imagine 99% of those subscribing to this reflector agree that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00127.html (9,432 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] CQ Lisbon (score: 1)
Author: Dennis McAlpine <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:56:44 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
W2LK and I will have a six hour lay-over in Lisbon on Tuesday Nov. 23rd on our way to CR3L. We arrive at 8:10 am on Tuesday and leave for Madeira at 2:40 pm that afternoon. Anyone else passing throug
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00369.html (6,903 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] 100 Watt power limit for Sprints-Discuss (score: 1)
Author: "Dennis McAlpine" <dbmcalpine@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:50:19 -0400
I agree with Jeff. Living in a gated community, it is impossible for me to put up a tower or beams and with the tallest trees in my yard being only 40' high, I will never have a signal big enough to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00164.html (9,356 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu