Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dennis12amplify@aol.com: 129 ]

Total 129 documents matching your query.

61. [Amps] RE: Amps, Who Did It? English version available??? (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:13:11 EDT
Traian, I enjoyed the pictures, but couldn't translate the text. Is there an English translated site link available? Regards, Dennis O. -- In a message dated 10/27/04 10:02:29 AM Central Daylight Tim
/archives//html/Amps/2004-10/msg00452.html (7,290 bytes)

62. Re: [Amps] SB-220 (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 21:29:50 EST
The mechanism that allows a parasitic oscillation in a pair of 3-500Zs is the 0.3pF of C between the anodes and the cathodes. 0.3pF seems pretty trivial until one discovers that it amounts to a feedb
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00053.html (7,685 bytes)

63. Re: [Amps] SB-220 parasitic suppressors (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 02:41:59 EST
-- Today's trivia question: At its max freq of 1000MHz, what is the -j1326 OHMS Dennis O. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00062.html (7,430 bytes)

64. Re: [Amps] A Meeting Ground (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:14:24 EST
Bill, I have been reading your posts lately and want to commend you for your 'sage' advice. I also enjoy Rich's posts but lately he seems to be a bit cranky. I guess I would too if I kept having to f
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00083.html (8,451 bytes)

65. Re: [Amps] A Meeting Ground (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 17:23:51 EST
Since currents take the closest path to ground, it should go through this wiper lead to the pan instead of the threaded shaft through the face plate. Will, Actually, since both paths would have some
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00102.html (8,209 bytes)

66. Re: [Amps] A Meeting Ground (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 18:52:46 EST
Dennis, Well they probably would somewhat but I would think the currents in the face plate would be reduced a good degree this way. If the negative from the power supply is attached directly to the c
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00106.html (10,058 bytes)

67. Re: [Amps] A Meeting Ground (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 18:56:57 EST
I beg to disagree just a bit: I have never seen Rich disagreeable ( cranky) without a DARN good reason, and I've been a fan of his for quite some time now.!!! Nuff said.!! carl / kz5ca -- To: Carl, R
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00107.html (8,173 bytes)

68. Re: [Amps] Here's a Shocker (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:58:31 EST
Which makes me wonder if it wouldn't be good to have our AC power lines run at about 1000 Hz or so. No more shocks, no more accidental electrocutions. The worst that could happen would be a burn. Som
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00216.html (7,833 bytes)

69. Re: [Amps] Shock hazard? (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:10:10 EST
Since the line cord in the picture was obviously recently replaced anyway; why didn't they just replace it with a 3-wire cord? Dennis O. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing l
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00218.html (7,738 bytes)

70. Re: [Amps] Here's a Shocker (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:56:34 EST
* I didn't know that I was that uneducated in that area. * I taught circuit analysis using Boylestad at Morton College. * I held a 1st class FCC license until I received a 'grandfathered' General. *
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00223.html (10,808 bytes)

71. Re: [Amps] Electrical shock testson humans = 'from drooling,to urination, to... (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:13:13 EST
How did the person who's heart stopped cash in his cheque?? -- *If anyone died in the process, it was not indicated in the data I saw. *There were doctors present. *My guess was that the person was r
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00230.html (7,073 bytes)

72. Re: [Amps] Here's a Shocker (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 00:33:50 EST
** I it looked to me as if I was also quoted in your response; my error I guess... What I responded to was this: Unless you're participating under two seperate accounts... ? **Only a single account.
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00231.html (10,582 bytes)

73. Re: [Amps] Re: Step-start calculation (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:34:30 EST
** I would guess that because of the large inductance associated with the HV secondary winding, (which would be in series with the secondary resistance and diodes when charging the caps), there could
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00349.html (7,896 bytes)

74. Re: [Amps] Re: Step-start calculation (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:54:45 EST
A transformer has inductance when open circuit, but when something's connected to its secondary, that impedance get transferred to the primary by the square of the turns ratio. So, when the transform
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00351.html (9,904 bytes)

75. Re: [Amps] Re: Step-start calculation (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:12:00 EST
Al W5CA **Another excellent point to ponder....... **Dennis O. _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00369.html (8,145 bytes)

76. Re: [Amps] Advice on instruments for ham use (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 03:32:12 EST
In a message dated 11/24/04 7:04:19 PM Central Standard Time, n8de@thepoint.net writes: I have an old RCA scope .. free for the hauling. It goes in the dumpster in two weeks if nobody wants it. Don N
/archives//html/Amps/2004-11/msg00423.html (8,601 bytes)

77. Re: [Amps] antennas that are 1:1 vswr all over the band (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:15:55 EST
Now make R=sqrt(L/C) and find the resonate frequency. f=???? I'll give it a try! F=1/(2pi*sqrt(L*C)) The standard resonance equation still applies.... But..... At resonance XL=R and Xc=R (by your des
/archives//html/Amps/2004-12/msg00299.html (8,939 bytes)

78. Re: [Amps] For any technicians (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:24:29 EST
The reason I'm mentioning this is I wonder just how many other manufacturers have been guilty of this? Will, I believe ALL manufacturers do things like that. It's just that in this case you found one
/archives//html/Amps/2005-01/msg00230.html (6,473 bytes)

79. Re: [Amps] Small Amplifier (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:01:39 EST
I want to build a new small amplifier for those times when I really don't Dave, The 4CX300's, (especially the 300Y's with their actual 400 watt plate dissipation), utilize twist lock shakeproof socke
/archives//html/Amps/2005-01/msg00261.html (8,039 bytes)

80. Re: [Amps] Relay rewinding (score: 1)
Author: Dennis12Amplify@aol.com
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:20:21 EST
Sam, The link provided earlier is correct in winding DC relays. I'll try to explain it in a little simpler terms (theory). A DC relay acts different than an AC relay in the current drawn in the coil
/archives//html/Amps/2005-01/msg00262.html (8,348 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu