Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:djl@andlev.com: 78 ]

Total 78 documents matching your query.

41. [TowerTalk] Inexpensive Baluns? (score: 1)
Author: djl@andlev.com (Dan Levin)
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 21:10:43 -0700
If you've got an opinion on the best inexpensive current balun, I'd love to hear it. I need a couple of baluns for use with the set of vertical dipoles that I plan to use for my second radio - and I'
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00353.html (7,365 bytes)

42. [TowerTalk] Second radio tri-band antenna options? (score: 1)
Author: djl@andlev.com (Dan Levin)
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 23:18:16 -0700
Ok - so the goal here is to increase my competiveness for medium duty contest use. Primarily in domestic contests like Sweepstakes and the CQP. I am near S.F. in 6-land. My "main" antenna system will
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00136.html (8,800 bytes)

43. [TowerTalk] Re: Do I need a rebar cage? (score: 1)
Author: djl@andlev.com (Dan Levin)
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1998 10:35:29 -0800
Many folks have answered the "how far from the dirt" and "how do I get the rebar off the ground" questions - but no one seems to have tackled the "do I really need a rebar cage" question. Coincidenta
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00183.html (8,997 bytes)

44. [TowerTalk] 40/75 M antenna on Crank-up? (score: 1)
Author: djl@andlev.com (Dan Levin)
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 21:29:35 -0800
In olden times, we had a fixed mast that supported the tri-bander and the 40/80M inverted V. All was well. Then the bright young son (yours truly) installed a 70' crank-up tower. Much better for the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00447.html (7,759 bytes)

45. [TowerTalk] Mast ID and Strength (score: 1)
Author: djl@andlev.com (Dan Levin)
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 1998 15:26:00 -0700
I appeal to the collective wisdom and those better equiped with reference material than I to verify what I have been told about my new (used) mast. The mast is identified as 2" o.d., 1/4" wall, E1020
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00048.html (6,943 bytes)

46. [TowerTalk] Mast Insertion Depth (score: 1)
Author: djl@andlev.com (Dan Levin)
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1998 20:11:04 -0700
Is there a rule of thumb about what percentage of the mast should extend down into the tower to the rotor, vs. what percentage should extend out to the top of the tower to hold the antennas? Thanks,
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00096.html (6,981 bytes)

47. [TowerTalk] HyGain HG70HD (score: 1)
Author: djl@andlev.com (Dan Levin)
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1998 09:10:45 -0700
I am about to pick one of these up used. I plan to use it for a single tower single-op station, probably with a tri-bander and a 2 element 40M beam plus wires. If anyone has any experiences to report
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00159.html (7,004 bytes)

48. [TowerTalk] Tower Base - Design Change Question (score: 1)
Author: djl@andlev.com (Dan Levin)
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 10:57:12 -0700
Learned friends, I am about to install a used Hygain HG70HD 70 foot heavy duty (relatively just above the top of the tower, and some kind of ~5 sq. foot 2 element 40 meter yagi about 10 feet above th
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00430.html (9,256 bytes)

49. [TowerTalk] Several questions :-) (score: 1)
Author: djl@andlev.com (Dan Levin)
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 19:19:08 -0700
Just hoping that the assembled brain-trust can clarify a couple of things. All of the below pertains to my planned installation of 10, 15, 20 and 40 meter coverage on a heavy duty 70 foot crank up wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00693.html (10,642 bytes)

50. [TowerTalk] 205BA -> 46' boom OWA Yagi (score: 1)
Author: Dan Levin <djl@andlev.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 20:20:29 -0400 (EST)
I would rebuild it into a 6 element OWA yagi. I did this with a 105CA with excellent results. The 46' boom is a bit shorter than the designed for 48' boom, but I'm sure you could tweek the design w/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00761.html (7,550 bytes)

51. [TowerTalk] Re: Different Feedline Velocity Factors (score: 1)
Author: Dan Levin <djl@andlev.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 13:24:35 -0400 (EST)
Nope. Should work just fine. The only critical piece is the electrical length of the feedlines from the "switching network" to the antennas. Those lines must all be the same length - electrically. Y
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00947.html (7,717 bytes)

52. [TowerTalk] Re: Receive Antennas for 10-40 (score: 1)
Author: Dan Levin <djl@andlev.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 12:17:11 -0400 (EST)
I have had great luck with a set of vertical dipoles for 10-20. I use them as back-up second radio transmit antennas, but they work wonderfully as receive antennas too. I would build vertical dipoles
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00098.html (7,998 bytes)

53. [TowerTalk] Re: TH7 Traps (score: 1)
Author: Dan Levin <djl@andlev.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 14:39:30 -0400 (EST)
Flame Suit On You could just get rid of the TH7 and get an antenna with no traps - like a C-31XR... Said with tongue firmly planted in cheek. Best 73, **dan, K6IF See you all in the California QSO P
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00257.html (6,953 bytes)

54. Re: [TowerTalk] Question on 80M 4-square amongst trees (score: 1)
Author: Dan Levin <djl@andlev.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 12:56:26 -0400 (EST)
Remember, it is the effective diameter of the element that matters, not (in this case) the material, or the fact that it is tubing vs wire. You can easily increase the effective diameter of a wire an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00477.html (7,524 bytes)

55. [TowerTalk] T2X Control Box Creating RFI (score: 1)
Author: Dan Levin <djl@andlev.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:30:25 -0400 (EST)
I vaguely recall a thread on this in the past, so my apologies if this is a repeat. I can't find the old thread in the archives... I have recently isolated my rotor controller box as the source of a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00482.html (7,761 bytes)

56. [TowerTalk] Re: Feedlines (score: 1)
Author: Dan Levin <djl@andlev.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 01:14:16 -0400 (EST)
I consider BuryFlex (tm) to be the best 'low loss' cable in the RG-8 class. It is ~$.59/ft. the last time I looked. That said, nothing can beat 75 ohm CATV hardline. It is extremely low loss, and fre
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00605.html (6,832 bytes)

57. [TowerTalk] Re: 80 meter 4 square elements (score: 1)
Author: Dan Levin <djl@andlev.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:41:36 -0400 (EST)
Well, I'll try an answer to the "how do I build the elements" part of the multi-part question :-) I would at least try the obvious approach. Take one element down. Build a stinger using 1 1/8" down t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00667.html (7,595 bytes)

58. [TowerTalk] Raising TV Mast... (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Levin" <djl@andlev.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 20:14:37 -0800
I'm thinking about using standard "heavy duty" 16 guage 1.25" steel TV mast as a temporary support for the middle of my trap dipole. This is not "telescoping" push-up mast, but rather the standard st
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00610.html (7,337 bytes)

59. [TowerTalk] Re: Isotruss Towers (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Levin" <djl@andlev.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:29:28 -0800
I was pretty impressed until I got to the following sentence in the instruction manual: Warning: Isotruss towers are not meant to be scaled or climbed. Do not climb this tower for any reason!! Oh wel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00264.html (6,745 bytes)

60. [TowerTalk] Re: Elevated Guy Anchors (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Levin" <djl@andlev.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 23:05:01 -0800
At the risk of being annoying, this topic has been debated at length in the past. Please read the archive, conveniently provided by our own KA9FOX at http://www.qth.com/ka9fox/elev-guy.txt . Everythi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00054.html (6,823 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu