Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:edk0kl@centurytel.net: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Interface Problems (score: 1)
Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:03:53 -0600
Hi folks, I'm a neophyte when it comes to FSK. Been using AFSK for some time and tried to make the switch to FSK, what a problem. Equipment: FT-1000MP MKV, Dell D400 Laptop Rigblaster plus, not for F
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00098.html (7,653 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Interface Problems (score: 1)
Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:38:45 -0600
Yes, That's the issue, using the FSK input (RTTY). I use the packet input for FSK, so _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00100.html (9,364 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Interface Problems (score: 1)
Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:42:25 -0600
Yes, That's the issue, using the FSK input (RTTY). I use the packet input for AFSK, so I don't have to mess with the mike etc. It's almost as if the tone shifting input is running at high speed, not
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00101.html (9,522 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Interface Problems (score: 1)
Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:25:41 -0600
Thanks for the reply Don, Here is where I am, the radio PTT works when the appropriate lead is shorted to ground, then additional short to ground gives me the shift. The radio is working as is the ca
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00104.html (13,344 bytes)

5. [RTTY] Trouble with MMTTY/EXTFSK (score: 1)
Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:34:39 -0600
FOLKS- When I first turn the computer on, I go through one or 2 PTT events followed by a continuous PTT presence. I am using LPT1 pin 2 for FSK and pin 6 for PTT pin 20 for ground having found pin 25
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00203.html (6,700 bytes)

6. [RTTY] Problem with MMTTY, more (score: 1)
Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:23:58 -0600
I probably should have been more detailed in my description. I use LPT1 with a laptop/ docking station. It makes for a convenient workstation when on the air or contesting. Normally I use the desktop
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00210.html (7,239 bytes)

7. [RTTY] MMTTY/EXTFSK Issue (score: 1)
Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:56:02 -0600
Thanks for the good info, me thinks the switch is the best option, I have the interface in a little construction box anyway. Best for New Year and Merry Christmas to all (and to all a good night) 73!
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00216.html (6,291 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] RigBlaster Pro and FT-1000MP (score: 1)
Author: Ed K0KL <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 03:24:36 -0500
Ron You do not need 2 serial ports to control the rig for FSK. The MMTY site has a dandy interface that uses 3 pins of the 9 pin serial output; ground, PTT, and key FSK. It uses 2 transistors and 2 r
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00201.html (10,369 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] 2012 CQ WW dates (score: 1)
Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 19:54:42 -0500
Actually, according to CQ Magazine it's Sept 24 & 25 0000Z to 0000Z ed K0KL _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-08/msg00013.html (6,938 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] Help with 1000MP (score: 1)
Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:42:11 -0600
I would stick with serial port to Rigblaster, which will do PTT and FSK Keying. Use USB to serial for rig control. By the way the filters should be switchable, you just have to crank the shift knob a
/archives//html/RTTY/2012-02/msg00117.html (8,856 bytes)

11. [RTTY] RM ... (etc) (score: 1)
Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:42:17 -0500
It seems to me the whole problem is the League should first sell these ideas to the membership, THEN do the FCC proposal. Not surprise (sand bag) us first. Especially after previous attempts have bac
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00082.html (6,441 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] 3khz wide signal at about 14.100 (score: 1)
Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:33:17 -0500
you mean 14.107 (?) 73, John N1JM _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty _____________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00245.html (7,351 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Is it just me? (score: 1)
Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:36:55 -0500
Me too ... 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie If I was going to be there I would too. Someone who will actually be in Dayton should probably take charge of this. This company is ham
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00138.html (13,057 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] QRM to W1AW/0 (MO) RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 10:47:53 -0500
How about don't blame the victim ... ! I didn't know even the exalted bulletins were special and above the rules we all live with (?) Ed K0KL The W1AW Bulletin station has been doing that for years.
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00010.html (11,059 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1)
Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 19:41:41 -0500
Gee Dick Missouri (MO) finished at 7pm CDT Tuesday, Log uploaded today (Saturday). Its a shame you had to wait 3 whole days ... How long do you take until you upload DXCC? ed K0KL The current missing
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00077.html (8,102 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1)
Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 13:51:59 -0500
Maybe it's best to be more selective, your comments painted with a big brush ... I can't explain any other state, though a frequent phrase in Washington these days is " ..what difference does it make
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00085.html (10,113 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] QRM to W1AW/0 (MO) RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Ed K0KL <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 18:47:05 -0500
Mike: With all due respect, are you attempting to replace the late Wayne Green as an ARRL critic?? It seems endless.... 73! ED k0kl On 6/4/2014 8:25 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote: I have sent a letter
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00224.html (12,240 bytes)

18. [RTTY] ARRL (score: 1)
Author: Ed Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 22:16:41 -0600
Realistically folks, We gained an 80 meter phone band which is lightly populated ... (3600-3800). The beef with 11708 was putting wideband where other modes (read narrow band low power) were presentl
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-03/msg00007.html (8,190 bytes)

19. [RTTY] 80 meters (score: 1)
Author: Ed Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 21:01:02 -0600
Hey fans ... Look at it this way. In the before time the space between 3600 and 3700 was largely ignored except for the traffic nets. They seem to have partially faded away, we don't do that much any
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00009.html (9,072 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu