Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ersmar@comcast.net: 445 ]

Total 445 documents matching your query.

261. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M DIPOLE USIGN COAX (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 17:40:15 +0000
Hasan: My tower has a moderate ground field underneath it as I also use the tower with a shunt-feed gamma wire on 160M. I have about 135 feet of #2 copper wire and a dozen copper ground rods in the e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00345.html (15,666 bytes)

262. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Site...... (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 05:52:35 +0000
Can you say SteppIR? 73 de Gene Smar AD3F _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Cal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00371.html (7,617 bytes)

263. Re: [TowerTalk] Yanking out ground rods] (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 23:59:03 +0000
Tom (the one asking the question, not the one answering it): Ratchet bumper jacks as decribed by Tom (the one answering your question) also worked for me when I had to remove a ground rod. Took all o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00412.html (9,761 bytes)

264. Re: [TowerTalk] 160-m Inverted L or Sloper? (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:22:07 +0000
Rich/K9OM: I've had all three antenna designs mentioned in this thread: Inverted L and shunt-fed tower on 160M and an 80M sloper wire off my 64-foot tower. In my case they all worked in that they pre
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00461.html (14,530 bytes)

265. Re: [TowerTalk] Shunt Feeding, Can this be? (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 21:13:02 +0000
Pat: I just checked the SWR on my 160M shunt-fed tower from the shack and it's 2:1 or lower from 1.8 - 1.9+ MHz. I don't ask questions. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F __________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00505.html (9,113 bytes)

266. Re: [TowerTalk] measuring coax loss with an MFJ-259B (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 22:48:08 +0000
Pete: You are probably correct: Using your 75 Ohm coax hunk at other than 28.000 and 28.875 (representing 32 and 33 half-wavelengths, respectively, of your fundamental freq of 1.750 MHz) is putting y
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00513.html (10,581 bytes)

267. Re: [TowerTalk] Shunt Feeding, Can this be? (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 22:57:36 +0000
Gary: Sorry - but shunt feeding doesn't work in your part of Texas. I'm just kidding. But if your 45G means Rohn 45G tower, I'm assuming then that your tower is properly guyed. If so, then I believe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00518.html (10,958 bytes)

268. Re: [TowerTalk] mast (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 06:16:39 +0000
Jess: Special Metals, Inc. 6406 South Eastern Oklahoma City, OK 73149 Sales: Joe Varva 800-727-7177 73 de Gene Smar AD3F _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00588.html (8,013 bytes)

269. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:27:25 +0000
Dino: Thanks for the very interesting photo, which raises a few questions: 1. What are the pairs of loops at the base? Torroidal transformers for the feedlines? 2. Is that a pier-pin base at the narr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00606.html (9,161 bytes)

270. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:25:26 +0000
Dino: the In other words, they supply Austin power? Thanks for my learning experience for the day. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F I'm sorry. I'll stop now. _______________________________________________ See:
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00610.html (7,881 bytes)

271. Re: [TowerTalk] Radials (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:06:00 +0000
Dudley: Belts-and-suspenders. That's what I did, FWIW. On my tower I installed about 135 feet of #2 solid tinned copper ground wire buried about eighteen inches. I welded this wire to twelve 8-foot l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00628.html (10,170 bytes)

272. [TowerTalk] Climbing belt FS on that www thing (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 17:11:05 +0000
TT: FYI. I found the following for sale: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7564506549&ssPageName=MERC_VI_RSCC_Pr4_PcY_BID_Stores_IT . 73 de Gene Smar AD3F ___________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00669.html (7,317 bytes)

273. Re: [TowerTalk] Used belts (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 18:20:48 +0000
TT: I've heard many arguments for using an integral safety harness/positioning belt. But for my money, I'd like to keep the two systems separate. If my integral harness fails, will BOTH primary and b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00675.html (11,567 bytes)

274. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m Antenna Tuner Recommendation? (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:08:17 +0000
Scott, Mike et al: Here's the URL for the Members' Only ARRL page that will get you a pdf of the Feb 2003 QST article on QRO tuners: http://www.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/pr0302.pdf . There al
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00690.html (8,819 bytes)

275. Re: [TowerTalk] BEST MEDIUM SIZED TRIBANDER BEAM FOR CONTESTING? (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 04:19:16 +0000
Mike: My favorite (and only) tribander is a Bencher Skyhawk. Specs say 8.5 sqft, but don't say how this number is computed. Caveat Amateur. Other than that one question, I have no problems with the S
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00711.html (8,943 bytes)

276. Re: [TowerTalk] BEST MEDIUM SIZED TRIBANDER BEAM FOR CONTESTING? (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:32:15 +0000
TT: Also looks like a Bencher Skyhawk with element hose clamps instead of rivets, but without the torque balancing nonsense in the front. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F ________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00797.html (10,138 bytes)

277. Re: [TowerTalk] BEST MEDIUM SIZED TRIBANDER BEAM FOR CONTESTING? (score: 1)
Author: <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:39:39 -0500
Jim: Your English is infinitely better than my Swedish, or Finnish for that matter. I understood the intent of the word Cartoon. 73 es Merry Christmas de Gene Smar AD3F ______________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00801.html (10,121 bytes)

278. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna wars (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 01:40:49 +0000
TT: Likewise for me and the Yagi test report - well worth the money. Let's try to get Steve and Ward to add more antennas in 2006, like Tennadyne models and the SteppIRs. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F _______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00814.html (10,487 bytes)

279. Re: [TowerTalk] Positoners Calibration to True North (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 01:53:29 +0000
Sean: Here's a page from the US's NOAA that allow you to calculate magnetic declination for any location on the planet during the near future (it's a slowly varying value due the the daily wandering
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00020.html (11,248 bytes)

280. Re: [TowerTalk] INVERTED L and TOWER SWITCH (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 05:50:07 +0000
Jose': Congratulations and welcome to Topband. I'd run the coax up the tower to the switch. I can't imagine why you would NOT do this. Loss at Topband is minimal for the extra coax length to run up t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00041.html (8,929 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu