matching. Bingo...the excuse that it can happen with paper QSLs or even LoTW, if collusion is at play, is a red herring. My grid square is 'locked' in eQSL, and I have moved twice already. in a futu
I'm not a computer programmer, just an end user. DXkeeper uploads a QSO at a time as you hit 'log', if configured to do so. It 'calls' TQSL and 'creates' a pk?? file. It appears, by your description,
Hi Jim, model. No idea if that's the reason, but as stand alone subscriptions, specially for those outside of the US, they're way overpriced. I may consider re-joining after this, provided QEX and NC
Hi Scott, it is in a digital format. But then they become very user unfriendly. PDF is best, but my guess is that the League is worried about 'piracy'. I understand that, but there must be a better o
The reason/justification for the change is 'interesting': "RAC said its Prince Edward Island members have been working for some time to create a separate Section for RAC ARES activities there. The pr
Very well stated, Paul. I'm on the record as a QRP aficionado, but also as the guy that pours some cold water on QRPers to remind them the other station does most of the 'heavy lifting'. Improving on
this one. Precisely, give it some time. I'm not 'hooked' on FT-X contesting, but it can only improve with time. Whether the improvements will be enough to make it sustainable in the long run is what
Hi Peter, That's a valid concern, and the excerpt from the committee message you quoted should 'buy' all critics some time: "For the FT mode it is not yet clear where the fault is..." Read the preced
This is certainly a big part of the problem, and as implied, not caused by the contest. Some may still be using old versions of the software that won't pick up the sequence from the RR73. Others are
I stand corrected on the software part. Thanks, Ria. The only explanation possible then is 'bad attitude'. :^) An even greater hobby! Vince, VA3VF The problem with software versions has been largely
Very well stated, Stan. Thank you! Will it change minds? Not likely. To the WW-Digi Committee: Please continue with your good work. It needs more time to bear fruit. If it does not work out in the en
As is CW. I think I get your point, and if so, I agree. Another case of nomenclature becoming the issue. Easy to fix though. FTx(so called digital) QSOs? Most contests' so called QSOs are actually c
Not by today's practical standards. Otherwise, why are FT-x 'communication' not considered a QSO by the 'experts'? I guess we'll get into the computer to computer stuff again. I'll pass. Let it be kn
Hi Jim, Back to the discussion, after a virtual glass of Ki-Suco, the Kool-Aid PY equivalent of my youth. LOL "I strongly disagree with setup instructions in the WSJT-X operator's guide. The audio le