Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jmlowman@sbcglobal.net: 297 ]

Total 297 documents matching your query.

81. [TenTec] ADMIN: "Contrarian" threads (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 20:26:40 -0700
Gentlemen, Keep the discussion civil, or I will end it. Further: policing the list in any way is a violation of the rules. If you're tired of the discussion, don't read the messages! If a discussion
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00101.html (8,683 bytes)

82. Re: [TenTec] Being tired of "On being a contrarian" (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 21:36:17 -0700
Point of clarification: This is the Ten-Tec list. The Orion and O II are Ten-Tec products. Therefore, discussion of these radios is on topic for the list. 73 de Jim - AD6CW __________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00159.html (7,714 bytes)

83. Re: [TenTec] My dream Ten Tec rigs (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:15:18 -0700
Caity and all, any idea at what point (s/n?) the receiver sensitivity improved? I have a 6N2 and wouldn't part with it. There are so few out there that they are now a sought-after item. I like your s
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00202.html (9,080 bytes)

84. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:44:28 -0700
The requirement to have general-coverage on receive has always puzzled me. Back in the day when I got into ham radio, the best radios were optimized to work on the amateur bands. Yes, I know that not
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00208.html (8,295 bytes)

85. Re: [TenTec] Yep -- Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 20:33:45 -0700
Hi Caity, Grant and all, First, let me say that I was not putting down general-coverage reception. Like many potential hams in the 50s/60s and earlier, I began as a SWL. My first receiver was a Halli
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00248.html (12,586 bytes)

86. [TenTec] ADMIN: Re: Orion II - Tech Topics (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:35:47 -0700
I think Bill has a good point here. Arguing ad infinitum and ad nauseam on the list about actual or perceived shortcomings of the Orions isn't getting us very far. While there are other lists dedicat
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00320.html (9,112 bytes)

87. Re: [TenTec] "End of an Era" (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:31:09 -0700
Isn't this the reason that the Jupiter essentially replaced the Pegasus? And perhaps why the Kachina is no longer in production? Jerry makes a good point. As sort of a tangential example, a few years
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00548.html (8,435 bytes)

88. Re: [TenTec] Being a Contrarian...." (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:38:20 -0700
Sherman, this message caused further messages from you to be held for moderator approval. Policing the list in any way is against the rules of the list. 73 de Jim - AD6CW ____________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-09/msg00255.html (8,182 bytes)

89. Re: [TenTec] RF Gain mod for ARGO V (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 19:41:00 -0700
Jim, no problem at all. That's the reason that the list is here. Did you contact someone at Ten-Tec, or did you post the question to the list? A couple of folks from T-T are members of the list, and
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-10/msg00118.html (7,805 bytes)

90. Re: [TenTec] Different list for CW comments (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:18:43 -0800 (PST)
In time this, too, shall pass. In fact, I'm surprised that it isn't over by now. However, I would gently remind everyone that policing the list is against the rules; also that you have a delete key.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00439.html (7,498 bytes)

91. [TenTec] [Fwd: Orion II Spot Control] (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:11:58 -0800
-- Original Message -- Subject: Orion II Spot Control Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:49:33 -0600 From: Gary Strong <gjstrong@comcast.net> To: <tentec-owner@contesting.com> I am new to this list and as of
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00841.html (7,899 bytes)

92. [TenTec] ADMIN: Re: Orion I and II on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:14:43 -0800
Brett, there's no need to leave the list. Too bad that I didn't catch you before you unsubscribed. You did the right thing by apologizing quickly and were a man about it, which I respect. The others
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00599.html (8,965 bytes)

93. Re: [TenTec] Unofficial TT site (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:43:07 -0800
It's there now, guys. There had been a problem at QTH.net and QSL.net for the past couple of days. As far as the status of the site being maintained, I'm not sure. 73 de Jim - AD6CW _________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00938.html (7,350 bytes)

94. Re: [TenTec] Unofficial TenTec Pages (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:51:54 -0800
There is also the W8KC Virtual Ten-Tec Museum at: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/w8kc/tentec.html However, I don't know how long that site will continue, since we lost Paul unexpectedly last year. It
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00939.html (8,052 bytes)

95. [TenTec] ADMIN: Re: WTB: TT282 OR INRAD 751 FILTER (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:58:22 -0700
Gang, I do NOT like to see this sort of message posted to the list. Remember that there are two sides to every story. I've seen this happen many times and most often, it was a matter of a misundersta
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00414.html (8,745 bytes)

96. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec OMNI VI + looking for a home (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:48:18 -0700
Not me. If I opt for an Omni VII or Orion down the road, the Omni VI stays. 73 de Jim - AD6CW _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.co
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-06/msg00447.html (7,816 bytes)

97. Re: [TenTec] David Barlow (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:28:42 -0700
I have removed Dave's two addresses from the list, and have expressed condolences privately to Betty. Thanks to all for the heads-up. 73 de Jim - AD6CW _______________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00381.html (6,912 bytes)

98. Re: [TenTec] Linix (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
Hi John, I was a Red Hat enthusiast for a while, because that's the distro that we used when I was getting my UNIX/Linux systems administration certification. After some problems with the last two ve
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-08/msg00032.html (7,817 bytes)

99. Re: [TenTec] Fragile Radios (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:41:42 -0700
At the office, we get new high-end computers every three years. The last batch of Dell GX-270s, several of us had to have the motherboards replaced due to bulging electrolytic capacitors. Fortunately
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-09/msg00285.html (9,613 bytes)

100. Re: [TenTec] Production dates for Omni VI + (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
Alan, we lost Paul, W8KC, suddenly and unexpectedly last year, so that would explain the lack of updates. 73 de Jim - AD6CW _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-09/msg00321.html (7,638 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu