Mail Archive Search: <+from:jna@tcpbbs.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:jna@tcpbbs.net: 80 ]

Total 80 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Karlnet] KN-50 SNMP/ Net Management Server (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 03:44:03 -0500; Do you have a sample config file you could pass on for examination? Monitoring these things would be great. Thanks, John _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@W; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00314.html (36,868 bytes)
22. [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 21:43:07 -0500; Hello Group, I am trying to diagnose bad transfer rates in my network and started at square 1. We have an RG1000 SAT shooting a 3MB/S feed to a central relay tower only about 1 mile from the datacent; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00388.html (10,800 bytes)
23. Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:38:14 -0500; That is whith a KN-200! No idea, I was told that the ping fill results show a round trip results. And that what ever I got in the ping fill will only show transfer half of the results in one directio; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00396.html (13,673 bytes)
24. Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:40:23 -0500; The whole idea was to stay a karlnet network and as far as I know 2.4 is the only thing you can use karlnet with? Even so we went cross polarization. So our backhauls are 2.4 on horizontal and our PT; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00397.html (16,308 bytes)
25. Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:41:02 -0500; Ours is all bridge up and untill it hits the router. John at central it. my here? to _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00398.html (17,005 bytes)
26. Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 02:40:59 -0500; I have considered that as an option as well,mikrotik, but if it is possible I wanted to keep it all Karlnet based because of the way we are setup. See we have our data feed coming from a data center; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00406.html (27,359 bytes)
27. Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:15:38 -0500; Yes SOMETHING is wrong and that is what I am trying to figure out. But I did start at the beginning. All towers (will be) connected to the central relay point the KN-200. This gets its feed to the n; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00411.html (10,235 bytes)
28. Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:38:55 -0500; Yes we have a 3MB feed into the switch at the data center, the RG Sat is plugged into that switch and sending it over to the central relay. The test is done from my win98 laptop at the ethernet of t; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00414.html (10,491 bytes)
29. Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:41:40 -0500; I think this might be the key!? But would like to know for sure before I replace all my RG backhauls. John _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00415.html (8,976 bytes)
30. Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:48:28 -0500; No my home link is an RG as well and is not experiencing the problem, its actually doing more than it should if we believe the ping fill. It is the central relay that is not getting the bandwidth bei; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00417.html (12,349 bytes)
31. Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:00:33 -0500; Adjusting that with DrTCP the day I got my laptop, lol. I am using places like bandwidth.com bandwidthplace.com and as a last resort dslreports.com (Not to accurate under heavy load). Thats on my lap; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00421.html (10,048 bytes)
32. [Karlnet] Novell & Karlnet (score: 1): Author: <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:59:36 -0500; Hello, I just did a new install today and came upon a stumbling block. They have a small network setup internally with a novel netware 6 server. Problem I need to overcome is how to get the computers; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00148.html (8,239 bytes)
33. Re: [Karlnet] Hang up of the cell (score: 1): Author: <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:11:41 -0500; Wow and I thought it was just me. This exact same thing randomly happens to me as well. Just happened last night actually usually once per day I will loose ability to pass traffic to the ap1000 all m; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-01/msg00169.html (9,381 bytes)
34. Re: [Karlnet] Giving away KarlNet Ubicoms (score: 1): Author: <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 03:21:45 -0500; One mans trash anothers treasure, will take em for sure. Thanks, John Buwa _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailma; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-03/msg00019.html (7,582 bytes)
35. Re: [Karlnet] KARLNET RESPONSE_ ReductionofKarlnetfeaturesw/outnotification. (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 04:35:03 -0500; I think basically what he meant and I have felt the same as well. That the pricing on the software does not reflect the hardware its being installed on. Why pay the same software costs to run half th; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00140.html (15,085 bytes)
36. [Karlnet] Loosing our bandwidth when we lost the copper! (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 01:50:37 -0500; PROBLEM: We are now only getting 400-800K on a 3MB connection out!? Our main tower AP1000 was being fed from our uplink provider to our tower via a T1 loop from there data center to our tower. Our wi; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00149.html (11,908 bytes)
37. [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 04:58:08 -0500; Hello, Confident my problem was in the routes I decided to play with the routes. I gave the radio interfaces private routes 10.10.10.1 and routed the real network over that via indirect routes. This; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00150.html (9,582 bytes)
38. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:18:15 -0500; I understand that but I failed to assign the radio ports the any ips and now I need to get into it remotely via a wireless link not the ethernet port that is why i was wondering how or if it is poss; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00155.html (10,679 bytes)
39. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:37:49 -0500; The relay kn-200 which is the one in the middle it is in routing & bridging mode. It does have ips assigned to it. It actually has 12.96.250.38 via a direct route to interface 1 and as the prefered; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00157.html (14,298 bytes)
40. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:15:44 -0500; the No, Its not that I do not know HOW to get to the Ethernet port of the KN-200 it is I do not have PHYSICAL access to any of it at this time. Other wise I would have just plugged into it via a cro; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00159.html (10,568 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]