Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jvaldesr@cantv.net: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed Rule Change - CQWW PHONE (score: 1)
Author: "Jose Valdes" <jvaldesr@cantv.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 14:14:39 -0000
Hello Steve and every one in the list, I have been following your proposal with interest and would like to see some more elaborated reasoning. For instance, why are you proposing these rules? Why lim
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00253.html (10,611 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed Rule Change - CQWW PHONE (score: 1)
Author: "Jose Valdes" <jvaldesr@cantv.net>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 21:20:58 -0000
Again this are complains, not answer that has been elaborated. No one has yet enumerated the alleged problems that operating below 7040 during a 48 hours weekend is creating, one year is composed of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00257.html (13,347 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed Rule Change - CQWW PHONE (score: 1)
Author: "Jose Valdes" <jvaldesr@cantv.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:28:50 -0000
Hello John, Nice to hear form you again, and by the way, we had a 40 meters SSB QSO during the 1989 CQWW SSB Contest, thanks for that QSO. It is correct, the limitation is imposed by the FCC and is n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00266.html (12,520 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] What to expect from 10 meters??? (score: 1)
Author: "Jose Valdes" <jvaldesr@cantv.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 15:08:36 -0000
Hello, All the comments are absolutely right. A good frequency to monitor for openings on 10 meters is 28.200, there we have 18 beacons distributed around the word in all continents and in both hemis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00199.html (14,828 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] FW: What Software to use ???? (score: 1)
Author: "Jose Valdes" <jvaldesr@cantv.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:35:16 -0000
Hello all, After 19 years using CT I was forced to look for another application, new high-end notebook doesn't have PARALLEL ports and many, and mine are not exception, doesn't have SERIAL ports, eve
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00300.html (8,973 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx ssb spotting report over modulation (score: 1)
Author: "Jose Valdes" <jvaldesr@cantv.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 12:43:02 -0000
Hello Doug, Unfortunately this over modulation problem is not unique to SA stations, as you know, and you are in my log, I was on 80 meters and some times I had problem understanding some of the US s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00102.html (9,617 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to KA1LMR's Posting About Spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Jose Valdes" <jvaldesr@cantv.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:59:08 -0000
Hello all, It was written "I notice alot of stations ask the statsions they work to spot them...." I like to make clear that in the above scenario the station asking to be spotted should be immediate
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00125.html (9,548 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Response to KA1LMR's Posting About Spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Jose Valdes" <jvaldesr@cantv.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:11:47 -0000
"3.14. In contests where spotting nets are permissible, spotting your own station or requesting another station to spot you is not permitted." As I read this rules I can clearly see that this rule ap
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00131.html (12,416 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Spotting and YN4FD (score: 1)
Author: "Jose Valdes" <jvaldesr@cantv.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:37:02 -0000
Bob, As a DX station I operate from Venezuela, therefore I don't work none W/VE stations in the ARRL contest, but along with ON4UN and PJ2T, my station was one of the most active/spotted stations on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-03/msg00221.html (9,544 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu