Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k2xx@swva.net: 72 ]

Total 72 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [Orion] Sub-Receiver Muting (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:50:11 -0500
Jim, the N4PY software allows you to mute the RX. So there must be a software (firmware?) command that accomplishes that task. Those familiar with the Orion commands should be able to provide a solut
/archives//html/Orion/2006-02/msg00010.html (7,970 bytes)

42. [Orion] Version 2.054 Beta Installation Question (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:33:38 -0500
I just downloaded and installed the version 2 firmware and did a master reset (but not on the memories or the filter settings). Although the installation program reported a successful upgrade, the ra
/archives//html/Orion/2006-02/msg00011.html (7,692 bytes)

43. Re: [Orion] S meter and sweep adjustment for Orion version 2 andother comments on firmware 2.054 (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:14:33 -0500
Carl, here's an update on my latest experiences with 2.054/1.19f (I've copied the Orion and N4PY lists also.): 1. V1.119f has almost completely solved the excessive sensitivity problem in the sweep d
/archives//html/Orion/2006-02/msg00035.html (8,873 bytes)

44. Re: [Orion] O2 issues (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:20:02 -0500
Grant, your comments on the Orion I's NR behavior were quite illuminating. I have complained about the increased noise issue on several occasions. I have to admit that the problem was erratic, and I
/archives//html/Orion/2006-02/msg00038.html (9,487 bytes)

45. [Orion] Orion display issue (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:31:45 -0500
I am using firmware version 2.05 and it has been a major improvement over v. 1.372. However, I recently turned off my gear and when I turned it back on again, the display was much dimmer and I was no
/archives//html/Orion/2006-03/msg00022.html (7,672 bytes)

46. Re: [Orion] Orion display issue (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:10:46 -0500
Duane, thanks for your prompt reply. Well, after I sent my message, I upgraded from 2.055 to 2.056. The problem still exists, but it appears to be related to the Main tuning knob; it works fine when
/archives//html/Orion/2006-03/msg00025.html (9,694 bytes)

47. Re: [Orion] Orion display issue (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 15:53:29 -0500
John, thanks for your input. Well, the low contrast setting still persists (You should pardon the expression.), but it looks like the weird behavior of the selection (Main) knob must arise from a fau
/archives//html/Orion/2006-04/msg00002.html (9,098 bytes)

48. [Orion] [Fwd: Re: Orion display issue] (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 10:14:15 -0400
Here's the answer from TT Service: Dear Joe: The internal contrast needs to be set. This control is accessible through a small hole on the bottom right of the front panel (looking from the front) wit
/archives//html/Orion/2006-04/msg00003.html (10,170 bytes)

49. Re: [Orion] Orion display issue (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 12:47:43 -0400
John, I spoke too soon. The highlighted line in every menu is now totally immobile whether using the front panel Main knob or the knob on the remote pod. Since I use the N4PY software, I don't need t
/archives//html/Orion/2006-04/msg00005.html (8,606 bytes)

50. Re: [Orion] Orion display issue (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 11:59:56 -0400
That sure makes sense! _______________________________________________ Orion mailing list Orion@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/orion
/archives//html/Orion/2006-04/msg00008.html (11,173 bytes)

51. [Orion] Transverter Problem w/Orion I (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:43:55 -0400
I am using a DEM transverter with my Orion. It has worked satisfactorily in the past, but now I am having a problem with both the control of output power and mike gain. The Orion works fine on HF, bu
/archives//html/Orion/2006-07/msg00007.html (7,128 bytes)

52. Re: [Orion] Reluctant to post but here (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:36:38 -0400
Digest mode is a good idea. I'm glad you guys brought it up. 73, Joe _______________________________________________ Orion mailing list Orion@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin
/archives//html/Orion/2006-08/msg00007.html (7,687 bytes)

53. [TenTec] Headphone Audio Levels (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 09:08:33 -0400
I've just been using 2.059d since this weekend, and there's no doubt that the main audio output level is down substantially. I've also observed that when using NR, the RF gain is reduced and has to b
/archives//html/Orion/2006-09/msg00008.html (28,374 bytes)

54. Re: [TenTec] [Orion] low audio (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:33:20 -0400
Yes, I have just started using this new feature, but it doesn't seem to affect the reduced audio problem. K7HP seems to have made some reliable measurements confirming substantially reduced audio out
/archives//html/Orion/2006-09/msg00018.html (8,676 bytes)

55. Re: [Orion] More ramblings about 2.059d firmware (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:34:29 -0400
Gary, I have to agree with you. I originally posted that the NR was working better than ever, but with more experience now, I see that it is clipping weak signals badly, especially in high QRN condit
/archives//html/Orion/2006-09/msg00027.html (8,361 bytes)

56. Re: [Orion] More ramblings about 2.059d firmware (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 11:31:40 -0400
It's interesting to hear the our different impressions regarding the NR on the 1.372 and 2.056 firmware. On my Orion they always seemed to markedly increase the noise rather than reduce it. They beha
/archives//html/Orion/2006-09/msg00032.html (12,130 bytes)

57. Re: [Orion] V2.059d Vs. v1.373b5 Noise Reduction Code (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:47:39 -0400
Merle, thank you for that detailed description of the NR operation. I have never seen that on the reflector before (although I was off the TT reflector for more than a year and only on the Orion list
/archives//html/Orion/2006-09/msg00036.html (11,571 bytes)

58. Re: [Orion] V2.059d Vs. v1.373b5 Noise Reduction Code + Myexperiences with 1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:31:52 -0400
Sinisa, I admit to not having referred to the manual in quite some time, but I just went to p. 46 in both the 2003 and 2005 manuals and could not find the phrase you quoted. I looked over that page a
/archives//html/Orion/2006-09/msg00038.html (11,173 bytes)

59. Re: [Orion] V2.059d Vs. v1.373b5 Noise Reduction Code + Myexperiences with 1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:12:38 -0400
OK, Martin, I am not going to argue. My first encounter with the term was when my Elmer, W2OKE and an EE, referred to it when I was 16 years old. At first, I thought he was joking, and the vision of
/archives//html/Orion/2006-09/msg00043.html (10,645 bytes)

60. Re: [Orion] V2.059d Vs. v1.373b5 Noise Reduction Code + Myexperiences with 1.373b5 (score: 1)
Author: Joe Giacobello <k2xx@swva.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:44:26 -0400
Bill, thanks. I remember Sinisa's paper, but I never had much luck with it. Nevertheless, I'll reinstall 1.373b5 and try exactly what you suggest. There is no doubt that there was too much RF gain. H
/archives//html/Orion/2006-09/msg00044.html (9,886 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu