Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:km1h@jeremy.mv.com: 288 ]

Total 288 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower ACCIDENT (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:27:09 -0400
Following that logic you then cant reuse tower sections if the galvy has been nicked. Obviously that is not real world reality. And as I have mentioned earlier there are now several speciality coatin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00825.html (18,386 bytes)

62. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower ACCIDENT (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:07:43 -0400
A very basic reason; a local supplier has a stock of 3/4" J bolts and nothing for 5/8". Flange strength is inmaterial at this point if the bolts shear. Very true and by using the TVRO bracket with a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00841.html (12,484 bytes)

63. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Accident (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:11:26 -0400
So the Sasquach tales are true after all? Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com htt
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00844.html (10,681 bytes)

64. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower ACCIDENT (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:36:42 -0400
WOW, Ive removed and reused many base plates including a few that were within 100-200 yards of the ocean and never saw one that bad even after 20-25 years. Id suspect a concrete that has a higher con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00846.html (11,445 bytes)

65. Re: [TowerTalk] rohn qusestion (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:24:40 -0400
5' feet and 6'8" Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00855.html (7,871 bytes)

66. Re: [TowerTalk] rohn qusestion (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:54:00 -0400
No and you DO NOT want them sealed; the tower legs must be able to drain. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00857.html (7,940 bytes)

67. Re: [TowerTalk] rohn qusestion (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:51:40 -0400
No difference in construction. Cost decision is yours to make depending depending on which half section you want to throw away when you move. Id personally never buy a new half section. Carl KM1H ___
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00863.html (10,466 bytes)

68. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower design question (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:50:09 -0400
Just ask K1AR about that some time! He had to get Rohn to build him a shortie "reversal section" . Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ __________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00893.html (9,094 bytes)

69. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 45 Tower (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 12:15:44 -0400
If you have the room for a back guy why do you need a I beam? The beam should be the height that is calculated the guy wire would be at in a full length run. For a 100' of 45G and not insanely overlo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00904.html (8,224 bytes)

70. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:02:06 -0400
Something is VERY wrong with those gain figures Dick. Are you adding ground gain? And if the F/B is real Im not at all impressed with either. I could demonstrate at least 20dB F/B and 30-35 dB over 2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00910.html (15,066 bytes)

71. Re: [TowerTalk] can we please stop (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:10:14 -0400
I thought this IS the antenna reflector by default. Last month I looked thru 6 months of archives and damn near fell asleep from boredom. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ ___
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00929.html (10,453 bytes)

72. Re: [TowerTalk] Polarized Electrolytic in Rotator Box? (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 18:15:26 -0400
Use 2 in parallel and reversed David. Are you going to be in GA before hurricane season? BTW, Id almost be interested in that Solar BA Carl _______________________________________________ ___________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00936.html (8,752 bytes)

73. Re: [TowerTalk] Polarized Electrolytic in Rotator Box? (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:44:07 -0400
Correction, wire in series positive sides out. Ive used regular 80mF 450V in the past on HAM series rotators. _______________________________________________ _________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00943.html (10,369 bytes)

74. Re: [TowerTalk] Shunt loading a tower as a single sideband(SSB) radio (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:07:17 -0400
He probably had a 10-4 Good Buddy to help him. Carl KM1H -- Original Message -- From: <n8de@thepoint.net> To: "Doug Rehman" <doug@k4ddr.com> Cc: <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00949.html (10,672 bytes)

75. Re: [TowerTalk] What is a good price for 3" or 4" irrigation pipe? (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:10:40 -0400
About $1 a foot for used but excellent around here. Carl KM1H _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00967.html (8,198 bytes)

76. Re: [TowerTalk] Its summer and antennas are on my mind (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 12:17:54 -0400
I had no problems working WAZ and over 200 countries on the 3 WARC bands during the mostly slow parts of the last cycle with a 160M inverted V with 80/75M inv Vees hung from the same feed which was a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00968.html (10,059 bytes)

77. Re: [TowerTalk] What is a good price for 3" or 4" irrigation pipe? (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:37:09 -0400
Ive seen it at farms that have either sold to developers or have planted different crops. Drive around rural areas and watch for farms that are irrigating; you usually cant miss the spray towers/head
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00989.html (11,286 bytes)

78. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Problem (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 17:46:30 -0400
There are 2 or 3 different size tube top sections. Most hams I know use the flat top section and mount a thrust bearing on it. Big arrays use a second bearing down in the tower about 4-5' and the rot
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00991.html (7,938 bytes)

79. Re: [TowerTalk] [Fwd: [Antennas] leds for rotor control boxes] (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 17:03:19 -0400
Therin WHAT? Who has those LED's? CArl KM1H -- _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00027.html (7,956 bytes)

80. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:18:55 -0400
Adding ground gain was a trick some manufacturers used to inflate the specs in their ads. That led to QST banning any gain claims for decades. I prefer the very basic dBi, then you can toss in the ex
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00028.html (20,541 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu