Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:lists@subich.com: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] I just have to ask (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 12:32:54 -0500
Since the beacon network is CW, why isn't it moved to 14.000.0, 21.000.0, etc.? Moving them to the bottom of the band, they provide a nice band edge marker and the multi-KW, multi-multi stations can
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00110.html (10,398 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Now Official: The Netherlands Antilles Will Be Dissolved on 10-10-10 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:52:37 -0400
Don't jump the gun. None of the former Netherlands Antilles automatically gain "new country" status. To become a "Political Entity" the territory must: be a member of the UN General Assembly, have a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-09/msg00061.html (9,139 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Now Official: The Netherlands Antilles Will Be Dissolved on 10-10-10 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:44:49 -0400
Ron, It would not be consolidating the two existing Netherlands Antilles entries into one ... it would be deleting the two current entities and replacing them with three new ones (Curacao, St. Maarte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-09/msg00067.html (15,125 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Now Official: The Netherlands Antilles Will Be Dissolved on ... (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 22:21:04 -0400
Jeff is absolutely and provably wrong. Using the following locations on Saba and Bonaire, the separation distance *DOES NOT* exceed 800 km as required for separation in an "island group" Bonaire: 12
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-09/msg00078.html (14,416 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Meaning of Assisted (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 09:44:18 -0400
No, there is not "general agreement" that the use of skimmer (when located within one's own station) should put the operator in the unlimited category any more than there is general agreement that t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-09/msg00135.html (10,847 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Meaning of Assisted (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:34:29 -0400
Paul, Regardless of what you say, it is *not true* that there is *general agreement*. ARRL and the CQWW Contest Committee may have codified *their view* into the rules for their contests. That's fine
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-09/msg00146.html (13,281 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Meaning of Assisted (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:22:08 -0400
Jorge, But no other *person* is finding them for you. Your argument could be used to prevent the use of history files and SCP ... you are not copying the exchange for yourself ... they are being furn
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-09/msg00150.html (16,964 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Meaning of Assisted (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:26:42 -0400
As one who remembers contesting before computers and before bandmaps, *ALL* of the things done by computer were game changers. How anyone can not consider computer logging, bandmaps, SCP, etc. anyth
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-09/msg00151.html (10,058 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Meaning of Assisted (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:34:37 -0400
No, there are several contest sponsors who do not take a punitive view of Skimmer and have no restriction against its use by any single operator. You took "determining which technologies are appropr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-09/msg00158.html (14,731 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Meaning of Assisted (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 11:26:28 -0400
Amateur radio (radiosport) is not "any competitive activity." Amateur radio competitions have, since their inception, been based as much on technology as operator skill. Even the first DX contests -
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-09/msg00175.html (14,332 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Meaning of Assisted (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 11:45:14 -0400
Why bother working just another KH6 or 9Y or 9A or G or W if one is not going to be competitive due to the lack of antennas and punitive rules against other technology? As a Contest Hall of Fame mem
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-09/msg00177.html (11,940 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Meaning of Assisted (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 19:59:39 -0400
All of this means absolutely squat ... I can easily come up with a similar litany of all the things that technology has made possible in the last 30 years - including the ability of those who don't k
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-09/msg00189.html (13,464 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] [N1MM] CW Timing Issues? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:09:41 -0400
It seems that good programmers like Don Agro (MacLogger DX) and Thomas Linder (RUMLog/RUMped) don't have any trouble with good quality CPU generated CW ("bit pounding") although they cam also use Win
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-04/msg00039.html (11,541 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] LoTW confirmation rates (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:01:44 -0500
Someone needs to point out that the emperor [still] has no clothes. Rick, Bob and Dave have done a marvelous job rebooting Trusted QSL and expensive new hardware has restored the original rapid proce
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00132.html (10,525 bytes)

15. [RTTY] Fwd: RE: MINUTES OF ARRL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 23:44:41 -0400
It's not just the RTTY contest community that has a stake here - any RTTY operator, digital DXer, PSK31 operator, JT65/JT9 operator PSK31/63 operator and CW operator/contester will be directly impact
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-04/msg00172.html (12,425 bytes)

16. Re: Topband: Crimea DXCC status? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 23:40:01 -0400
Amen! I can't believe that K1ZZ can so blatantly ignore the DXCC Rules! Section 1, Rule 7: As far as international norms of civilized nations - including the US, all of the EU, UN and particularly th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-05/msg00158.html (11,386 bytes)

17. Re: Topband: Crimea DXCC status? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 01:04:07 -0400
These are not "political statements" - they are in indictment of K1ZZ for blatantly ignoring the DXCC rules. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2014-05-22 11:54 PM, Dave Novoa W4DN wrote: Please, keep the politica
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-05/msg00160.html (7,650 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu