Mail Archive Search: <+from:lsica@visi.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:lsica@visi.com: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Expandability of Universal B26 towers (score: 1): Author: lsica@visi.com (lsica@visi.com); Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 10:22:55 -0500 (CDT); I'm looking to purchase a Universal 16-50 tower, that has the following 10 foot sections: 26St-26Tr-22Tr-18Tr-14Tp (for various reasons I won't get into here, I'm limited to a 26" base) Is it practic; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00002.html (7,286 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Tennadyne (score: 1): Author: lsica@visi.com (Louis Sica, Jr.); Date: Sun, 3 Oct 1999 15:31:08 -0500; Or maybe it just implies that the other antenna has a lot less gain than the other manufacturer claims it does (loss due to traps, etc). Also if (as stated here previously) a yagi is "more particular; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00049.html (9,128 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Questions Please? (score: 1): Author: lsica@visi.com (Louis Sica, Jr.); Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 06:47:39 -0500; We may be into another "Apples Vs Oranges" debate here If we're into similar boom length comparisons, it should be C3S Vs. T6, and C3 Vs. T8. The T10 has a 24 foot boom Since Force 12's in CA, and Te; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00109.html (8,330 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] C3 vs tennadyne (score: 1): Author: lsica@visi.com (lsica@visi.com); Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 11:38:40 -0500 (CDT); Am I the only ham out there on a budget, who has to spend SOME of his income on a mortgage and little things like that? Or maybe even spends some of his DISCRETIONARY income on things the rest of th; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00118.html (9,222 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Re: c3 vs tennadyne (score: 1): Author: lsica@visi.com (Louis Sica); Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 14:36:34 -0500; Is this the 20 meter monobander at W6EEN that Lew McCoy talks about in his book "Lew McCoy Talks About Antennas"? I always thought the comparison between an LPDA and a 20 meter monobander was unfair; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00133.html (7,760 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] LPDA gain figures (score: 1): Author: lsica@visi.com (Louis Sica); Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 14:49:21 -0500; On the topic that seems to be so much fun recently on this reflector... I've been reading some older LPDA articles by Peter Rhodes, K4EWG, running from 1973 to 1992, in various QST articles and artic; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00135.html (8,152 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] C3 vs tennadyne (score: 1): Author: lsica@visi.com (Louis Sica); Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 14:53:01 -0500; Oh, don't ever forget the value of dumb luck. I've got a 3Y/B, a VU4, and a 7O card in my possesion (all good) that I worked with 100 watts and a Butternut Butterfly at 30 feet. Maybe I *am* a better; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00136.html (8,403 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Re: c3 vs tennadyne (score: 1): Author: lsica@visi.com (Louis Sica, Jr.); Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 06:08:59 -0500; Hello Mike (and crew) with No, no, no, I'm sorry Mike, I was saying that the comparrison in the book was ridiculous (being so unfair). not your particular comments. But I suspect my characterization; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00155.html (8,756 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] LPDA gain figures (score: 1): Author: lsica@visi.com (Louis Sica, Jr.); Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 06:23:26 -0500; And if the issue were just if Maxwell's occasions were correct, I'd be at the same table with you, betting with you on the same numbers. But the issue is more than that. It's in how the formulas are; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00156.html (8,984 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] hdbx or hbx? Or neither? (long, sorry) (score: 1): Author: lsica@visi.com (Louis Sica, Jr.); Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 16:22:19 -0600; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0004_01BE4A11.363B2DA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm in the EARLY planni; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00493.html (12,591 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]