Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n7mal@citlink.net: 343 ]

Total 343 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [CQ-Contest] Ca QSO ?Sad :( (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:34:37 -0000
Ken said: "There is no reason to change the rules," Well the rules were changed, when I lived in CA, and participated in CQP, California stations were not required to copy the names of the counties,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00308.html (7,951 bytes)

142. [CQ-Contest] Pet Peeve (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 18:09:42 -0000
Contest season is starting off again and as usual at least 50% of those participating have no idea how call CQ. I'm tuning across 20m CW and there are at least 20 stations outside CA calling CQP. Her
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00003.html (6,959 bytes)

143. Re: [CQ-Contest] Competing in the Daylight (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 22:59:28 -0000
Can or could you add the technology of simultaneously displaying the Packet-Cluster spots so it would be easy to determine who was claiming single op but obviously stealing spots..??.. It is easy to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00169.html (9,425 bytes)

144. Re: [CQ-Contest] Competing in the Daylight (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:07:36 -0000
I don't know an algorithm from a pizza pie but here is a starting place: The participant's real-time logs and DX Packet-Cluster spots are fed into some computer with some special software. The softwa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00182.html (13,585 bytes)

145. Re: [CQ-Contest] Competing in the Daylight (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:02:33 -0000
I received 17, yes 17, private emails asking me to name names. Well for obvious reasons I am not going to do that but I wanted to respond publicly to at least this one, because I found it interesting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00222.html (10,173 bytes)

146. Re: [CQ-Contest] Domestic Contest Spots/Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 07:10:18 -0000
What an interesting posting Ken. In a single posting you validated what I said about my participation in the contest and the fact that I had been spotted several times on the cluster. You then procee
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00265.html (11,411 bytes)

147. Re: [CQ-Contest] Domestic Contest Spots/Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 05:33:02 -0000
Here is the maximum you are going to get from me. STOP asking for more because it's not going to happen under any circumstances. This is an excerpt from my log converted to an easy to read format(min
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00291.html (17,367 bytes)

148. [CQ-Contest] Fw: BPL and home linking (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 05:40:02 -0000
I received this from a friend, Bill, K7WT. Apparently these BPL guys are not giving up any time soon. I ran across this article and thought I would pass it along. http://www.edn.com/blog/400000040/po
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00292.html (7,374 bytes)

149. Re: [CQ-Contest] Domestic Contest Spots/Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:38:04 -0000
David said: """Its no secret that mal doesn't like packet or anything to do with it""" David that remark is so far from the truth it would be laughable if it weren't so, blatantly, patently, wrong. F
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00308.html (19,468 bytes)

150. Re: [CQ-Contest] Domestic Contest Spots/Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 23:47:42 -0000
I think the only thing I would add is if anyone wants to go through this exercise I recommend using the SS for your model. First you can only work a station once during the contest. If you see a patt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00315.html (13,286 bytes)

151. Re: [CQ-Contest] MFJ434 voice keyer woes (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 01:33:29 -0000
Jim you have the luxury at ZD8 & D4 of being in a place where everyone comes to you and you can, sort-of, 'cherry-pick' the loudest signal. Those of us on this side need the narrowest possible filter
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00353.html (10,379 bytes)

152. Re: [CQ-Contest] MFJ434 voice keyer woes (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 04:40:49 -0000
Whooooops... I meant to reply to N6TJ's posting about CW filters. Sorry if I caused confusion.... MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm http://geocities.com/n7mal/ Don't wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00355.html (11,562 bytes)

153. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contest Country Files - 23 October 2005 (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:55:29 -0000
I guess the obvious question Paul is how doest CT keep track. It's a nice comment many of you are making about logging what you hear but it doesn't matter if CT calculates from its own databases rega
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00486.html (9,746 bytes)

154. Re: [CQ-Contest] An Observation (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:22:17 -0000
Whoa: let's back this train up. Who decides what the """correct""" phonetics are? The phonetics you cited are the commonly accepted military phonetics, which is what we should expect from someone who
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00699.html (10,214 bytes)

155. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 23:21:48 -0000
And therein is the problem. You, and others, said: ""Outlawing packet tomorrow would not have the impact that many might hope. We have large numbers of stations that are not entering the contest but
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00088.html (13,228 bytes)

156. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 01:23:27 -0000
Nat thank you for posting that link. I was particularly interested with this sentence by N6TJ: "" Strive to feel comfortable in what you're doing."" Last week during the phonetics thread N7MAL(me) sa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00092.html (10,938 bytes)

157. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB - the corruptive influence of packet (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 14:16:50 -0000
That is precisely the attitude that will lead to the eventual end of contesting. MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm http://geocities.com/n7mal/ Don't worry about the wor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00128.html (16,448 bytes)

158. [CQ-Contest] Packet New Low (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 04:31:19 -0000
Contesting has new achieved a new low. The NCCC contest 'PRACTICE' now needs DXCluster for spots in a contest 'PRACTICE'. The NCCC is so inept at contesting they have to spot each other, so they can
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00166.html (7,688 bytes)

159. Re: [CQ-Contest] QRPers --- Please QRQ (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:25:49 -0000
I am even more impressed at the quality of some of the QRP signals. Several were over S-9 and one in Colorado was even 20 over 9. Those QRP guys have been doing a lot of antenna work and have really
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00286.html (10,779 bytes)

160. Re: [CQ-Contest] Exchanges (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:58:41 -0000
How about going from the sublime to the ridiculous..??.. I'm suggesting K1EA redo CT so that it sends random numbers instead of sequential. It won't effect the sender because the sender uses the F2 k
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00657.html (8,566 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu