Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n8vz@qth.com: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:19:51 -0400
Does anyone know the status the new display board that is coming out for the OMNI VII and ORION II? I saw a prototype at Dayton and was assured that it was ready for production. This board will allow
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00273.html (7,592 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:40:06 -0400
Thanks, Mike. If this is not an old, not-updated post, I was lied to at Dayton. I was shown a prototype board and was told it was ready for production. In fact, I was told that the week after Dayton
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00275.html (10,234 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:42:58 -0400
Make that "live sighting . . ." :-( _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00276.html (10,996 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 21:44:55 -0400
Well, Mike, this is most distressing. My friend is going to be furious. I'm a little upset myself, because I was told by the engineer responsible for the board that the one he had at Dayton was final
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00283.html (13,736 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:29:23 -0400
Stuart, September would be consistent with what I was told at Dayton, but the statement referred to earlier in this thread was worded as though the announcement was not anytime soon. Where is the ann
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00305.html (10,489 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:37:34 -0400
Duane, The engineer I talked with was not there on Friday but came in on Saturday. He was the guy who actually worked on the board, so he was on top of the issue, at least from an engineering standpo
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00306.html (18,861 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Regarding conversations with TT engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:45:00 -0400
Silencing TT engineers with a "gag order" is not really the answer to the problem. The answer to the problem is greater efficiency at TT. My friend was told (by a salesman, not an engineer) that the
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00313.html (9,880 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:08:51 -0400
Well, I'm not a Marine but an old Navy guy, but I can appreciate the national security issues and the priority that they take. Perhaps, this is not the right venue to talk about my experience trainin
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00315.html (12,546 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Conversations with Ten Tec Engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:27:38 -0400
Hmm . . . I don't think expecting a board that was due out "in a few months" to actually be available three years later is really whining. My friend, as I said, has an engineering background, and he
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00356.html (8,431 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Conversations with Ten Tec Engineer(s) (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:11:40 -0400
You really mean to put politicians and ham radio companies in the same category? :-) _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-08/msg00362.html (9,319 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] New Ten Tec OMNI VII for sale (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 02:01:12 -0400
This dude gives a whole new meaning to the word "bargain"! :-) _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/t
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00165.html (8,381 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Delay in Orion and Orion II Firmware? (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:14:13 -0400
What about the Orion and Omni7 real-time sweep board? 73, Carl N8VZ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-10/msg00209.html (9,410 bytes)

13. [TenTec] [Fwd: Re: Status of New Display Board for OMNI VII] (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:44:11 -0500
Since it's now almost December and there's no indication that this board is going be produced by the time Dayton rolls around in 2009, I thought I'd bring this old message back up to the top again. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-11/msg00147.html (10,012 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Recommendation for Orion II Interface? (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:01:46 -0500
Both MicroKeyer II and US Interfaces work in Vista with my OMNI VII. -- 73, de N8VZ (Carl) _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.conte
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-12/msg00065.html (11,599 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Orion II firmware release "this fall"....I hope (score: 1)
Author: "Carl J. Denbow" <n8vz@qth.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:31:40 -0500
Kind of funny, but it sort of reminds of gallows humor. Only, I think it's TT that's on the gallows. The question is whether Sir Lancelot will come and rescue TT at the last moment and get some of th
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-12/msg00190.html (10,778 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu