Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:notawc@juno.com: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Building a WARC Tribander (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 12:49:51 -0400
Has anyone had success with converting a standard tribander to WARC only? A used TH-6 would seem to be a decent , read cheap, choice based upon boom length and available tubing. Any suggestions for c
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00024.html (7,507 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] A Different Take On Guy Wires? (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 12:38:27 -0400
I suspect a bit of over reacting here, Ken's response appeared to be more tounge in cheek. Notice he said "almost". Yes, its always better to err on the side of caution. On a related thread would not
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00025.html (10,852 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] A Different Take On Guy Wires? (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 18:13:43 -0400
On Sun, 2 May 1999 13:06:10 -0400 "Joe Subich, W8IK/4" <W8IK@ibm.net> writes: Why not? I dont even consider the above as real antennas. Rotary dummy loads maybe. Such an installation That does not ag
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00032.html (11,172 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] A Different Take On Guy Wires? (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 17:55:44 -0400
I do ( starting about 30 yrs ago) but it seems many of the commenters are clueless. Some of the replies are totally ludicrous, uninformed and maybe dangerous. However I get real nervous above about 4
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00033.html (11,328 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Re: Rohn 45 Self Supporting Tower (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 18:04:09 -0400
But you said absolutely nothing about the guy specs. What do you use? It sounds as if the tower was not the issue. Poor masting will aways bend when least expected like during a contest. ____________
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00034.html (9,022 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Building a WARC Tribander (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 12:02:10 -0400
On Sun, 02 May 1999 17:44:35 -0500 Jim Rhodes <rhodes@willinet.net> writes: Is there a program that will model this? I tried several years ago with a early version of YO and got nowhere. ____________
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00089.html (9,682 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] A Different Take On Guy Wires? (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 12:04:43 -0400
Good point and I agree. I need to get a new program still trying to learn with early K6STI MN and YO releases, computers are not my best area of comfort. So, getting back to the original 60' of 45G w
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00090.html (11,343 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Mounting in the tower (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 10:38:42 -0400
On Fri, 7 May 1999 06:46:43 -0500 (CDT) Shane Dugas <shane@eatel.net> writes: I have been on many towers that have the 2nd thrust bearing mounted on a redrilled AS25G and installed in the normal shel
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00136.html (11,572 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Defective Rohn tower (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 11:01:24 -0400
It was my understanding that Rohn sued an/or bought out a lot of the competition over the past 30 years or so. Another source, particularly one that would mate with 25/45 would be nice. Maybe made in
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00192.html (9,825 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Hy-Gain, responsibility shifted (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 16:46:23 -0400
I disagree if I may. The original Ameritron amps when owned by Prime Instruments had a great name, top QC and no compromise on parts. Take an AL1200 for instance made by both regimes and compare the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00274.html (10,024 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Rohn 50G (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 16:08:22 -0400
Rohn did some custom designs that never made it into the catalog. Others were via competitors that Rohn bought and immediately suppresed all info. Any OT's remember KTV as just one example? My local
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00275.html (8,805 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] MFj/hygain thread (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 17:11:29 -0400
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Art is an ace, no doubt. But he got royally screwed by Crashcraft so what guarantees that the same wont happen in MS? I can say that no one I would trust ( reflector po
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00276.html (10,201 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Hy-Gain, responsibility shifted (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 16:20:10 -0400
On Tue, 11 May 1999 22:34:03 -0700 "Mike Nash, ND6A" <no6x@inreach.com> writes: Martin F. Jue will not rest until he controls the amateur radio market. The increasing lack of competition will result
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00277.html (10,325 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] Re: X9 vs C32XR, etc (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 16:57:32 -0400
SNIPPED I am no Cushcraft fan but I notice that many DX stations with fat signals are using the old A3 and A4 tribanders. Not all can be explained off by the competition as due only to location. The
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00339.html (9,336 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] EHS Question (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 13:22:58 -0400
On Sun, 25 Apr 1999 01:05:43 -0700 "Mike Nash, ND6A" <no6x@inreach.com> writes: The power company trucks around here use a lot of 1/4" and 5/16 HS but the CATV company uses 1/4" EHS as their strand s
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00600.html (9,728 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] EHS cutting, and surplus (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 12:04:12 -0400
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999 11:04:13 -0400 "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> writes: Nor I. Worked as CATV line man for 20+ years and bolt cutters always did the job. Just use a quality tool with replacable
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00625.html (8,626 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] EHS Question (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 11:21:15 -0400
Not correct or maybe there is a confusion with terminology. Cable cutters as by your description are not used on guy wire to my knowledge in CATV. They are used by electricians and others for softer
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00649.html (10,965 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] EHS Question (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 21:00:56 -0400
They may be a later attempt to overcome the Porter patent. However if they do the job why worry ??? Strawberry ice cream was developed since not everyone could agree between Chocolate and Vanilla. __
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00662.html (10,781 bytes)

19. [TowerTalk] A Different Take On Guy Wires? (score: 1)
Author: notawc@juno.com (notawc@juno.com)
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 15:39:49 -0400
All of this discussion over 60' of 45G? Suspect Bill had the right idea yesterday about traffic on the reflector. Norm On Thu, 29 Apr 1999 21:15:28 -0700 Michael Tope <W4EF@pacbell.net> writes: _____
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-04/msg00706.html (15,280 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu