Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:paul@n1bug.com: 90 ]

Total 90 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Has anyone every put up a V-beam? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 06:24:47 -0400
I had two inverted V beams (a 3 element on NA and 4 element on EU) on 20m before I had rotatable antennas. They worked quite well. I don't know what the gain was but much better than a dipole. Signal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-09/msg00237.html (8,937 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] LPFM STL (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 06:49:06 -0400
I haven't been following this thread closely, but are we only talking about going 100 feet? That is nothing for wireless. I have a very stable 5.6 mile wireless network link that supports 30 Mbps 24x
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-10/msg00171.html (7,477 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] LPFM STL (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:38:34 -0400
Another list member sent me this useful path design utility for the AirMax product but appears useful for other systems. https://airlink.ubnt.com/#/ Very interesting and it agrees within 1 dB of what
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-10/msg00180.html (8,896 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Solder For Connectors (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 20:58:22 -0500
Getting off topic, but back in the 70s/80s, amateur publications were claiming that if you were building something that you wanted to silver plate after fabrication (eg. a VHF/UHF amplifier tank circ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-11/msg00051.html (8,016 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Erecting tower sections solo (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:52:44 -0500
I am another solo installer. Please be careful! Erecting towers and antennas solo can be very hazardous. I don't recommend it. That said... I have erected 100 foot 25G towers by hanging a weight almo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-12/msg00028.html (8,937 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Erecting tower sections solo (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 17:32:29 -0500
Herb's method is certainly much faster than mine. I did three sections that way before deciding it wasn't the right approach for me personally. That's when I switched to the counterweight. Paul N1BUG
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-12/msg00033.html (9,559 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Erecting tower sections solo (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 08:49:17 -0500
I knew it was inevitable this would turn into a safety and "don't do that" discussion and almost didn't respond to the original question for that reason. But I also realized there are some who, for w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-12/msg00097.html (11,736 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Installing guy wires ??? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 13:14:27 -0500
This is the method I use. With 3/16" and 1/4" EHS on my +/- 100 foot towers I have never found it necessary to use a screwdriver or wrench to tighten the rope. Even when using turnbuckles as short at
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-12/msg00200.html (9,390 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Canīt add egg insulator... (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:17:55 -0500
On 12/14/2015 07:59 AM, Stan Stockton wrote: At risk of purists saying absolutely not, if I were going to put up just 30 feet of 25G tower and didn't have all the proper materials to insulate the guy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-12/msg00225.html (9,508 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Can?t add egg insulator... (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 11:12:15 -0500
On 12/14/2015 09:49 AM, Herbert Schoenbohm wrote: I thought that you could safely put 30 feet of Rohn 25 un guy above a good house or side building bracket. That is what I use here for an 10/12/ and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-12/msg00232.html (8,273 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 Guying (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 14:41:31 -0500
We did the same with a 50 foot and later 100 foot repeater tower, except our trees were a little smaller and anchors just above ground level. I never like it but it was our only option at the time. H
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-12/msg00357.html (9,477 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Mini UHF (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 06:43:07 -0500
Different animal, Dick. Keep looking, there is such a thing as the adapter you seek. I have recently seen them on eBay so you're looking in the right place. Paul On 12/31/2015 11:51 PM, Dick NY1E wro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-01/msg00000.html (6,636 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] 40-30m dipole design (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:29:47 -0400
While trying to figure out how to move up a notch from my inverted V antennas on 40 and 30 meters I came up with a crazy idea. I was looking at building a rotatable dipole for 40 meters, either full
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00296.html (7,526 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] 40-30m dipole design (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 07:30:32 -0400
Thanks John. I was not aware of that trap. I like the idea of requiring no band switching. The overall mechanical arrangement of the antenna would also be simpler. It appears the traps would need som
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00325.html (8,524 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 159, Issue 64- 30/40M dipole (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 07:59:11 -0400
Hank, thanks for the input. I didn't like my relay idea but when I wrote that post I hadn't yet seen a workable alternative aside from full size parallel tubing dipoles for each band. I could do that
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00327.html (10,199 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] 40-30m dipole design - GOALS (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:49:20 -0400
Both. I should have specified my goals. I am a DXer first, contester second. Currently I have a 40 meter inverted V, apex at 70 feet and 30 meter inverted V, apex at 80 feet. Here is what I would lik
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00331.html (13,162 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] 40-30m dipole design (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:03:49 -0400
NEC plots at http://jim-lux.blogspot.com/ Jim, Thanks for doing that analysis. 73, Paul N1BUG _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00389.html (9,045 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] 40-30m dipole design - GOALS (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:09:21 -0400
Agreed, Mike. Looking at the picture, it will need drain holes and some sealing of the slits where the clamp is at what is intended to be the bottom end. It looks manageable, though. 73, Paul N1BUG _
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00390.html (9,980 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] 40-30m dipole design - Thanks (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:15:03 -0400
I want to thank everyone who provided input on my recent question. It was an interesting discussion and revealed more than one method I had not considered or was not aware of. I got what I needed fro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00391.html (9,594 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] 2 inch Chrome Moly mast needed (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 19:31:21 -0400
any wall thickness, and any yield strength . Then insert the yagis at any point above the top of the tower, windload on each..and it spits out the survival speed in mph. I have seen reference to thi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00104.html (9,396 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu