Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:sm2ekm@telia.com: 230 ]

Total 230 documents matching your query.

21. [Towertalk] Re: IS Boom length the HOLY GRAIL ? (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 06:05:39 +0100
And just imagine those guys runing 10 kW output, man that will be a hot antenna!!
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00405.html (7,364 bytes)

22. [Towertalk] Re: Re: IS Boom length the HOLY GRAIL ? (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 16:47:32 +0100
Ok, what issue of CQ mag and how did you do to measure the 50% efficiency of the Yagi antenna? 73 Jim --
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00408.html (9,512 bytes)

23. [Towertalk] Re: Ham IV Brake Slips? (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 05:47:53 +0100
This solution from KK9A is not correct. The HamIV has a mechanical break, a wedge that goes in to a slot in the housing, it is very common that the wedge breaks. Hopefully (usually) it´s only t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00804.html (9,788 bytes)

24. [Towertalk] For K7LXC (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 16:59:36 +0200
Steve, It is impossible to mail you at the aol account, neither upthetower or K7LXC works 73 Jim SM2EKM
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00175.html (6,164 bytes)

25. [Towertalk] Re: RE: 40M 4 Sq vs. 2 el Yagi at 70 ft (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 20:47:27 +0200
If you get the Yagi at 1/2 wl or more it will beat the heck out of the 4SQ, even a dipole at 1/2 wl will beat the 4SQ with about 2 dB. I have a 4SQ (about 160 radials) and a 3 el Yagi at 90 ft , yagi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00436.html (8,898 bytes)

26. [Towertalk] Re: Soldering at the top of the tower (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 16:50:02 +0200
Yes crimp connectors!!! 73 Jim SM2EKM -- -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00633.html (10,073 bytes)

27. [Towertalk] Re: Tailtwister won't turn. (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 19:01:22 +0200
Works just find, did it the first time more then 30 years ago, it can work for years. 73 Jim SM2EKM --
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00091.html (8,958 bytes)

28. [Towertalk] Re: remote antenna switch (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 09:49:31 +0200
Don´t forget the German HOSCHA switch. I have a Hoscha 2000 switch that measures: 30 MHz 42 dB return loss, isolation 54 dB 145 MHz 35 dB return loss, isolation 41 dB 435 MHz 35 dB return loss,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00312.html (10,946 bytes)

29. [Towertalk] Re: Phasing Lines For Stacks (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:03:11 +0200
eeee hmmm, guys dont kill me now but to be in phase, and I guess that´s what you want, the feedlines has to be EXACTLY the same lenght. They "don´t need to" be mults of electrical wl, the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00637.html (10,675 bytes)

30. [Towertalk] Re: Re: Phasing Lines For Stacks (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 20:20:08 +0200
Yes Bill I see it now, thank´s for the explanation. I sure was wrong on this one, life is tough! 73 Jim SM2EKM --
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00655.html (9,209 bytes)

31. [Towertalk] 4-square vs 40-2CD (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 18:32:57 +0200
This is correct but the dipole has to be at least half a lambda up in the air. Forexample, 4SQ gives approx 5.5 dBi and with losses in near field lets say 4.5 dBi, a dipole at 1/2 wl gives approx 7 d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00226.html (9,371 bytes)

32. [Towertalk] OWA Yagis (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 18:15:33 +0200
As far as I remember OWA=optimized wideband array, that would explain it all! Why in the first place use a OWA design on 50 MHz? Not needed with so narrow band. 73 Jim SM2EKM --
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00372.html (8,256 bytes)

33. [Towertalk] Re: OWA Yagis (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 19:36:40 +0200
Gee, SORRY, well, not even EKM is perfect!!! 73, Jim PS: yes 15 needs a bit of OWA design, I made a decent thing 6 el on 43 ft boom, works great. --
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00377.html (7,837 bytes)

34. [Towertalk] Re: I Have Prob w/Virus Msgs (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 16:23:57 +0200
So everybody that gets a P5 card are going to report it on the towertalk reflector, gee what a bummer!!!!! Jim SM2EKM --
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00184.html (7,823 bytes)

35. [Towertalk] Re: 15M on C31XR (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 08:52:18 +0200
Do I get this right, the C31XR doesn´t work out of the box? From the below it seems to me that the C31XR needs to be rebult to work properly. It´s been stated on this reflector over and o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00227.html (10,678 bytes)

36. [Towertalk] Re: Re: 15M on C31XR (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:43:53 +0200
Don´t think you understod me either. As far as I remember I never talked about hights for antennas, how to tune them, MFJ analyzers, crank up towers etc etc. What I stated was that my feeling w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00278.html (9,104 bytes)

37. [Towertalk] EZNEC 3.0 question (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 08:31:43 +0200
Problem with YO is that the calculating engine is far too simple, you really have to be carefull with what you are doing. In any case, I would not trust YO alone, I would confirm my design on a progr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00500.html (10,074 bytes)

38. [Towertalk] Re: EZNEC 3.0 question (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 09:11:00 +0200
Another comment: Below I mean NEC 2, or 3 or 4 calc engine. And even NEC2 has a problem with close spaced wires so for designs like that I never ever would use anything else but NEC2-4 stuff. 73 Jim
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00502.html (8,783 bytes)

39. [Towertalk] Re: Stacking (again) (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 21:52:47 +0200
I would try to get the 10 and 15 as far separated as possible, maybe the 20 in betwen. 73 Jim SM2EKM --
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00537.html (7,637 bytes)

40. [Towertalk] Re: Re: Stacking (again) (score: 1)
Author: sm2ekm@telia.com (Jan Erik Holm)
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 16:39:49 +0200
Agree Tom. I´ve done a lot of modeling with NEC2 and it looks like 20 ft is very safe, I know that 10 is pritty bad and 15 is "pritty" good, your real life experience seems to say the same. 73
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00573.html (9,563 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu