Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:steve@karinya.net: 407 ]

Total 407 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [TowerTalk] Baluns for RX antennas (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:40:06 +0100
Tod, That's a nice write-up! I've also used the Spectrum analyser / tracking generator approach - I find the real-time plot instructive for seeing how the SRF swings around with changed lead "dressin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00474.html (8,383 bytes)

242. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:07:08 +0100
Jim, That's a gracious comment, and I genuinely appreciate it - thank you! But I wouldn't want Dean or anyone else thinking that I was that clever :) I was never considering differential dissipation
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00507.html (11,834 bytes)

243. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:52:51 +0100
Ian, Yes, when the choke reactance and the CM path reactance have the same sign there's a bonus. But what I was actually trying to show in that analysis is that the CM path reactance may have an uppe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00523.html (10,706 bytes)

244. Re: [TowerTalk] Balun Recommendation (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:13:54 +0100
Ian, I'll have one last try to get my point across, then I'll admit defeat :) Yes, you have been consistent in saying that "only the choke's resistance is completely DEPENDABLE" for solving RFI probl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00528.html (10,516 bytes)

245. [TowerTalk] CM choke using Fair-Rite 52 mix (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 10:17:21 +0100
I just started making measurements on some CM chokes using Fair-Rite's Here is a typical result: http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/temp/52_mix.png 73, Steve G3TXQ _________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-05/msg00016.html (7,840 bytes)

246. Re: [TowerTalk] CM choke using Fair-Rite 52 mix (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 16:28:17 +0100
Bob, Fair-Rite refer to it as a "new" material in the September 2009 copy of their catalogue. In terms of Initial Permeability it sits between Type K material. It doesn't have sufficient permeability
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-05/msg00018.html (8,539 bytes)

247. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax, conduit and toroids (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:59:10 +0100
Jim's comment should not be misunderstood. A 1:1 choke balun feeding a _perfectly_ balanced load does not have zero common-mode voltage across it; the choke CM voltage will be exactly half the voltag
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-06/msg00254.html (9,108 bytes)

248. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax, conduit and toroids (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:48:42 +0100
Jim, You'll not be surprised that I disagree strongly: 1) It is a BalUn - it's a device that interfaces a BALanced load (the antenna) to an Unbalanced source (radio + coax) 2) If the load is complete
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-06/msg00258.html (11,252 bytes)

249. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax, conduit and toroids (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:03:13 +0100
Roger, I challenge a couple of those comments: 73, Steve G3TXQ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contest
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-06/msg00259.html (10,727 bytes)

250. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax, conduit and toroids (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 21:05:38 +0100
Jim, I'm not going to waste my time in long debate with you again! I'll just leave other readers to check what I have said using NEC. You might believe that NEC can't model the common-mode currents,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-06/msg00261.html (10,329 bytes)

251. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax, conduit and toroids (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 21:34:05 +0100
For anyone without access to a modelling tool, let me try to give you a simple qualitative analysis. Say we have a perfectly symmetrical dipole fed with coax that drops away exactly at right angles f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-06/msg00262.html (11,880 bytes)

252. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax, conduit and toroids (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:14:04 +0100
Roger, Take a look at the 1:1 Guanella current balun - it's identical to one of Jim's CM chokes. It achieves current balance by impeding common-mode currents. They are the same thing! 73, Steve G3TXQ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-06/msg00267.html (12,366 bytes)

253. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax, conduit and toroids (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:14:09 +0100
For those who still have an open mind on whether or not antenna system balance guarantees zero voltage across the CM choke, I've sketched an equivalent circuit showing various currents, voltages and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-06/msg00268.html (11,230 bytes)

254. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax, conduit and toroids (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 22:38:28 +0100
"A radiating coaxial cable can be modeled quite well with a combination of transmission line model and a wire. The transmission line model represents the inside of the coax, and the wire represents t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-06/msg00274.html (10,972 bytes)

255. Re: [TowerTalk] Isolation and SWR (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:46:45 +0100
Not sure what your feedline length and type are, but just 2dB of loss in that line would give you a 4.5:1 SWR at the shack end if it were left completely unterminated at the other end. Steve G3TXQ __
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-09/msg00163.html (6,972 bytes)

256. Re: [TowerTalk] Turned reflector? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 21:39:31 +0100
I just tried it on an EZNEC model of a 5-el Yagi. The Forward Gain dropped by 0.3dB. The rearward pattern was badly affected: all the nulls were "filled in" as Jim suggested, and rearward lobes were
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-09/msg00287.html (8,298 bytes)

257. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Testing (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 15:44:28 +0100
Ham radio magazine May 1979, and the mobile reference antenna was a Hy-Gain TH-2 tribander Yagi not a Quad. Steve G3TXQ On 17/10/2012 15:29, Big Don wrote: Guess we weren't clear on the methodology.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00286.html (8,439 bytes)

258. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: 160 meter elevated vertical (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 18:25:02 +0100
You can just fit 17 turns of RG-58 on a FT240-31 toroid, and that will give you over 8000 Ohms CM impedance on 160m Steve G3TXQ On 20/10/2012 16:56, Jim Lux wrote: On 10/20/12 8:47 AM, Cqtestk4xs@aol
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00341.html (9,126 bytes)

259. Re: [TowerTalk] Topband: 160 meter elevated vertical (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 19:52:54 +0100
Jim, That's correct - you have to plan ahead ;) Steve G3TXQ I'll bet that's not with the connector on the coax<grin> _______________________________________________ __________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00343.html (7,961 bytes)

260. Re: [TowerTalk] Solenoid or Binocular configuration? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 09:36:13 +0100
Roger, Interesting question! I just tried a measurement using four FT240-31 cores - all I had spare in the component draw. I wound 9 turns of RG-400 on a stack of four cores. The CM impedance peaked
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-10/msg00346.html (8,382 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu