Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:stevek@jmr.com: 601 ]

Total 601 documents matching your query.

261. [TowerTalk] Guy Wire distance (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 14:01:32 -0800
_______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any ques
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00137.html (8,779 bytes)

262. RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] Vertical Dipole for UHF (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 07:59:19 -0800
The commercial 4-pole and 8-pole arrays (not including Cushcraft's product, which is amateur and quite different) use folded dipoles of heliarc welded aluminum construction, so there's no "hardware"
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00230.html (10,519 bytes)

263. RE: [BULK] - RE: [TowerTalk] electric fence qrn (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:54:39 -0800
"Dip It" tarnish remover, available in most supermarkets, does a pretty good job, too. If you have room to "wipe" the copper, "Twinkle" copper cleaner, applied with a damp sponge, works very well wit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00241.html (8,916 bytes)

264. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] electric fence qrn (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:57:48 -0800
I didn't realize when I posted before that you were talking about wire... I simply use liquid flux for this. Dip the end of the wire in the liquid flux, remove, and solder. Simple as that. Takes all
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00242.html (10,411 bytes)

265. RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] F12 customer service (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:43:42 -0800
Even here in CA, F12 does have the reputation of "some of the best antennas you can almost get." -WB2WIK/6 _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Sup
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00294.html (10,143 bytes)

266. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Bulkhead Source & Ground Rod. (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:47:05 -0800
8' copperclad steel 5/8" rods are $9.95/each at the local electrical supply outlets here....with ground clamp and a rubber cover at the hammering end to keep from flaring the rod. -WB2WIK/6 "Success
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00494.html (8,572 bytes)

267. RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] Re: JEFA Tech Cable - Direct from the company (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 07:55:24 -0800
As an aside, I've used Remee Products coaxial cables for many years and have had no more nor no less trouble with them than anything from Belden, Times, et al. Remee either acquired or merged with (I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00673.html (11,799 bytes)

268. RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] Insurance (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 08:56:03 -0800
I'll toss in that I agree, a good Homeowner's policy is sufficient in most cases. I had EMP damage to quite a lot of electronic gear, including ham gear, from a nearby lightning strike several years
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00708.html (9,453 bytes)

269. RE: [BULK] - RE: [TowerTalk] Re: Hardware Question (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 08:10:17 -0800
The difference between the SP80 and SP120 is how fast they get hot. The SP120 heats to soldering temp in about three minutes, the SP80 takes a bit longer. You're right, it's the thermal mass that cou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00797.html (15,442 bytes)

270. [TowerTalk] ROOF MOUNT TOWERS (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 07:38:12 -0800
_______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any ques
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00369.html (8,488 bytes)

271. [TowerTalk] Tower Placement (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 08:17:41 -0800
_______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any ques
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00133.html (8,944 bytes)

272. [TowerTalk] Certification to climb towers? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:41:00 -0800
_______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any ques
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00147.html (8,706 bytes)

273. RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] CC&Rs (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:01:55 -0800
Of course they did, and FCC's response was they were not going to deal with this at all, at this time (as of two years ago). The recommendation was to approach Congress via your elected Senators and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00548.html (9,876 bytes)

274. RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] CC&Rs (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:39:59 -0800
Slightly off-topic, but in your case with such short and old covenants, I'd recommend three things that possibly the lawyer didn't suggest, or do: 1. Determine if the CC&Rs have an expiration date, o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00553.html (12,057 bytes)

275. RE: [BULK] - Re: RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] CC&Rs (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 11:10:39 -0800
Maybe someone has tried that and succeeded, but I haven't heard or read about it. However, locally several individuals pressed the OTARD rule as hard as they could and the general results were worded
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00561.html (8,218 bytes)

276. RE: [BULK] - Re: RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] CC&Rs (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:31:33 -0800
Jim, that is exactly the kind of case I was looking for! Can you provide details on this? Thanks, Steve WB2WIK/6 "Success is the ability to go from failure to failure with no loss of enthusiasm." -Wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00565.html (8,268 bytes)

277. RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] W4AN Silent Key (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 07:41:30 -0700
What terrible news for the worldwide amateur radio community. Bill was a great operator and a tireless contributor to our hobby in more ways than I can count. Tom, if you get a chance, maybe you can
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00055.html (10,492 bytes)

278. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] Using Belden 9913 on a crankup? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:00:07 -0700
Bill, I've used Bury-Flex and also 9913F7, as well as other clones like IEWC 9096-IIA and Cable XPerts CXP1318FX. These are all quite similar. I can't tell a lot of difference between them; however t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00521.html (13,048 bytes)

279. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] 9913; Rotor loops (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:31:27 -0700
_______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any ques
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00562.html (8,327 bytes)

280. RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] Alternate method, PL-259 on RG-8-type co ax (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:56:09 -0700
The approach detailed probably works pretty well at HF, and not as well at VHF-UHF because the impedance discontinuity introduced by the PL259 is now made even longer by the method prescribed. Also,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00638.html (13,763 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu