Mail Archive Search: <+from:tomc7@earthlink.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:tomc7@earthlink.net: 75 ]

Total 75 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF/UHF committee recomendations (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:06:02 -0700; I too, am a loss as to why this has not been implemented. Some of us old timers may even remember that way back in the paper log days, one could claim DXCC credit for a contact during the ARRL DX con; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00096.html (8,880 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] VHF/UHF committee recomendations (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:58:35 -0700; Here is a link to the committee recommendation: http://www.arrl.org/contests/rate-sheet/?issue=2004-03-02 73, Tom K6EU aka K6EU/R _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00050.html (7,095 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 56, Issue 9 (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:22:43 -0700; As I remember it, we didn't like the results. We being a significant number of people on this list. Myself included. 73, Tom K6EU aka K6EU/R _______________________________________________ VHFcontest; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00047.html (7,726 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] No 432 mHz op (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:55:50 -0700; I've never understood the logic behind not allowing 4M in this contest. After all it is a WW VHF contest. Maybe 4M is treated somewhat like the WARC bands, IE no contesting. 73, Tom K6EU aka K6EU/R _; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00176.html (8,220 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] June 06 VHF QSO Party LCRs now available (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 08:34:46 -0800; Just speculation on my part, but I suspect the /R is stripped prior to log checking. IE if I (K6EU/R) work a station that log me as K6EU, it would be considered a valid QSO for both of us. I know I f; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-12/msg00058.html (9,355 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] LoTW for Rovers (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:01:12 -0700; Received a note from Paul, AA4ZZ indicating that LOTW should match up a /r QSO record with a non /r one. I checked and he is correct, my bad. So if you upload from a /r certificate LOTW will match QS; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00112.html (8,564 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] LoTW for Rovers (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:05:33 -0700; No you don't need a separate certificate for each location. You do need to set up a separate location (QTH) for each place you operate. You also need a certificate for a rover call (AA1AA/R). After e; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00105.html (9,405 bytes)
8. Re: [VHFcontesting] coax for 50 and 144 questions (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:20:31 -0700; Has anyone tried DavisRF's buryflex? On paper it looks like a cost effective alternative to LM-400 ultraflex. The Davis RF site quotes attenuation for buryflex as 2.98 db at 450Mhz. Ultraflex is stat; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00060.html (7,788 bytes)
9. Re: [VHFcontesting] contest logging software: current fave? (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 10:03:13 -0700; Yes, the VHF program does the same thing, IE it will not allow you to log a dupe. If you are using the logging program in post contest mode, the dupes occurred days prior to you entering the QSOs. Si; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00024.html (10,176 bytes)
10. Re: [VHFcontesting] contest logging software: current fave? (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 23:00:51 -0700; I use and recommend: N3FJP's VHF contest program. I especially like the "post contest" mode that allows me to enter a paper log easily after the contest. Dislike, limited rig support and inability to; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00013.html (8,012 bytes)
11. Re: [VHFcontesting] FM in VHF Contesting (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 18:43:00 -0700; OK for what it's worth, I attempt to make contact on FM during ever contest. In addition to setting up a second radio to monitor 146.55 and 147.54, I also call CQ ever once and a while. At best I get; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00243.html (8,647 bytes)
12. Re: [VHFcontesting] Qsl Forwarding Service ? (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:22:53 -0700; Not that I'm aware of. You might consider just up loading your QSOs to ARRL's LOTW. Seems like it's only a matter of time until it supports VUCC awards. 73, Tom K6EU _________________________________; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00238.html (7,699 bytes)
13. Re: [VHFcontesting] 2m yagi on 432 (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 14:30:21 -0700; Thanks for the rover ant suggestion. I may give it a try. As for John's 10 el 2M ant, I've used one on 432. As you say the max gain is at 45 deg off of center. I did some testing with a local and he; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00152.html (8,551 bytes)
14. Re: [VHFcontesting] K7RAT Two Meter Spring Sprint (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 13:32:33 -0700; Now, that's a great idea. The congestion on .200 can be a real pain. 73, Tom K6EU aka K6EU/r _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com ht; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00049.html (7,541 bytes)
15. Re: [VHFcontesting] Tonight (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 16:12:08 -0700; So that explains why there wasn't anyone on last night. Why did I think the Sprint was on Monday night???? Bob, I would start on 144.200 USB. Then move off the calling frequency if there is sufficien; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00020.html (7,006 bytes)
16. Re: [VHFcontesting] group roving (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:01:57 -0800; Boy, I'm really surprised to hear your comments regarding Mt. Diablo and problems on 6,2 and 432. I've operated from there multiple times with very few problems. Did you try in the lower (overflow) p; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-02/msg00004.html (8,334 bytes)
17. [VHFcontesting] N3FJP's logging program (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:00:33 -0800; I've used N3FJP's program for several years and have been pleased with it also. I operate as rover, logging by hand during the contest. I then use "post-contest" mode to enter the Q. Other than it n; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-01/msg00132.html (9,957 bytes)
18. Re: [VHFcontesting] Downsizing my Rover station (score: 1): Author: Tom Carney <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:11:23 -0800; I went through the same analysis several years ago before settling on an FT-100D. Here's what I remember about the comparison. First, I'm sure you realize that neither rig has a transmitter for 222.; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-12/msg00021.html (9,835 bytes)
19. Re: [VHFcontesting] CA QSO Party - VHF Plaque (score: 1): Author: "Tom Carney" <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:50:18 -0700; Thanks for the plug. The contest committee is hoping to increase VHF activity during the California QSO party. California hams are being encouraged to join in during designated VHF activity periods.; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-09/msg00138.html (8,703 bytes)
20. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rule Change Discussion (score: 1): Author: "Tom Carney" <tomc7@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:20:05 -0700; Ditto NE0P's comments. Most rovers out here are relatively low power, small antenna stations. Other than the first 30 minutes of a contest, I virtually never work a rover that is in a grid square I n; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00454.html (8,825 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]