Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ve2tzt@arrl.net: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] forest and trees RF absorbtion (score: 1)
Author: Gilles RENUCCI <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 22:12:25 +0000
Hi, Does anybody has serious data about trees and forest absorption on top band ? 73's , Gilles / VE2TZT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00148.html (6,775 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Serial numbers vs. power (score: 1)
Author: Gilles RENUCCI <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 20:46:57 +0000
During ARRL DX, On 160m, I got a 5991n6n, 3 times repeated, I think the guy sent his licence year ! About 50 VE/W had answered to my CQ's . I think ARRL should communicate more on the basic rules of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00254.html (7,265 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB below 1.843 (score: 1)
Author: Gilles RENUCCI <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 17:58:22 +0000
After every major contest, this question is raised by some purists or some non-contesrers upset by having been unable to use his/her usual frequency in his/her usual mode. It is a wrong interpretatio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00457.html (9,073 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] cut # (score: 1)
Author: Gilles RENUCCI <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 20:45:18 +0000
1) I have started the contest just having programmed my logging software to have T for 0 as cut number. When I came over #1000, I became obliged to give up and go back to original 0 because I got a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-05/msg00373.html (8,374 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero Beating (score: 1)
Author: Gilles RENUCCI <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 04:14:41 +0000
Same thing for me. I use a 250 Hz filter and sometimes I need to switch on the 500 Hz one to listen the station calling me, listening by the way the adjacent running station. The funniest is went a s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00003.html (9,337 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Mini-Spiral Flourescent Lights and Amateur Radio (score: 1)
Author: Gilles RENUCCI <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:02:59 +0000
Here, I use fluorescent lights as often as possible (when warn-up delay or color is not a concern) and their are far to be a rfi problem today. In the future, if incandescent are banned, I am afraid
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00468.html (8,480 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet (score: 1)
Author: Gilles RENUCCI <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:23:13 +0000
I am very impressed by the huge quantity of postings about this topic. For 2 or 3 years that I have been a subscriber to this reflector, It seems to be the most important subject for years. And what
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00326.html (11,994 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category (score: 1)
Author: Gilles RENUCCI <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:29:03 +0000
I am absolutely OK with what you are saying about antennas. My purpose was not to tell that ''SO2R'' should be a separate category, but just that the ''assisted'' one, for the same reasons as ''SO2R'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00533.html (9,186 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet (score: 1)
Author: Gilles RENUCCI <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 03:09:22 +0000
Sorry to get some bandpass on this endless topic but the judicious example of Joe, W4TV : had helped me to understand the ''opposite" points of view. And from where the difference is coming. If we su
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00589.html (10,643 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of di-di-dah-dah-di-dit in CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 14:53:31 -0400
As a regular, lowly attractive callsign CQing guy, after a CQ, it, sometimes, happens to have several simultaneous answers. In this case, I can suppose that all the answerers know my callsign. Then,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00172.html (10,222 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fills and repeats (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:38:51 -0400
Rowland, Very nice description of our usual QRN/QSB nightmare. I think that 3?9 is a good way to say what piece of information is missing. Sometimes the guy is able to send several times only the mis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00149.html (10,443 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:38:55 -0400
What you do not anticipate Tim is that soon, everybody will have access to a free remote RX close to his QTH and nobody will be longer able to know what kind of contact he is making. Gilles VE2TZT _
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00204.html (9,641 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Xtreme category, catch 22 (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:16:57 -0400
-- Original Message -- In Amateur Radio you have the word "radio" You are confusing radio-communications and communications. Your assertion should be right if you had wrotten "development of new radi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00221.html (10,041 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] WAEDC CW: only for Extra class USA (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:31:20 -0400
An other way to show one's disapprobation without giving the victory to the ''no-code digital mode dunderheads'' is to run the contest without respecting this rule, having the fun of the contest, se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00290.html (9,589 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - a contrarian opinion (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 14:35:13 -0400
Yes but now add to that on the second radio a SDR/panadapter or a Flex 3000 display, you will just have to click on the peaks of the spectrum display to tune and have the callsign decoded by your ''
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00259.html (9,793 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] spotting assistance during CQWW VHF (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:20:28 -0400
Hi everybody, I am not very familiar with the CQWW VHF Contest. As I did not find any mention about spotting assistance in the rules, I presume that it is authorised for single op. But with all the p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00278.html (7,155 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:42:57 -0400
That's one of the reasons why I keep audio records of all of my contests. In such a situation, including when I receive a QSL card ''not in my log'' I listen to what happened. Then I can take a clear
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-08/msg00044.html (10,097 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 - Area Activity (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 19:23:07 -0400
Since the beginning, I was believing that the WRTC was comparable to a sort of Olympics. In that spirit, every nation can send only a limited number of players.Then even if there are many very good o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00184.html (10,187 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why SuperCheckPartial makes you assisted (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:22:59 -0500
Always the same topic coming back periodically from ''old good times'' addicts. Very symptomatic : ''because SCP uses information ... compiled by others'' That looks pretty like the definition of a .
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00340.html (11,423 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why SuperCheckPartial makes you assisted (score: 1)
Author: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 18:02:32 -0500
For those who did not understand, ''generating your own electricity'' was ironic to say that if you open that door with SCP versus assistance, you will always find someone more purist than you to pus
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-11/msg00352.html (16,628 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu